Cargando…

A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity

Development of an accurate protein–DNA recognition code that can predict DNA specificity from protein sequence is a central problem in biology. C(2)H(2) zinc fingers constitute by far the largest family of DNA binding domains and their binding specificity has been studied intensively. However, despi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garton, Michael, Najafabadi, Hamed S., Schmitges, Frank W., Radovani, Ernest, Hughes, Timothy R., Kim, Philip M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26384429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv919
_version_ 1782398219448221696
author Garton, Michael
Najafabadi, Hamed S.
Schmitges, Frank W.
Radovani, Ernest
Hughes, Timothy R.
Kim, Philip M.
author_facet Garton, Michael
Najafabadi, Hamed S.
Schmitges, Frank W.
Radovani, Ernest
Hughes, Timothy R.
Kim, Philip M.
author_sort Garton, Michael
collection PubMed
description Development of an accurate protein–DNA recognition code that can predict DNA specificity from protein sequence is a central problem in biology. C(2)H(2) zinc fingers constitute by far the largest family of DNA binding domains and their binding specificity has been studied intensively. However, despite decades of research, accurate prediction of DNA specificity remains elusive. A major obstacle is thought to be the inability of current methods to account for the influence of neighbouring domains. Here we show that this problem can be addressed using a structural approach: we build structural models for all C(2)H(2)-ZF–DNA complexes with known binding motifs and find six distinct binding modes. Each mode changes the orientation of specificity residues with respect to the DNA, thereby modulating base preference. Most importantly, the structural analysis shows that residues at the domain interface strongly and predictably influence the binding mode, and hence specificity. Accounting for predicted binding mode significantly improves prediction accuracy of predicted motifs. This new insight into the fundamental behaviour of C(2)H(2)-ZFs has implications for both improving the prediction of natural zinc finger-binding sites, and for prioritizing further experiments to complete the code. It also provides a new design feature for zinc finger engineering.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4627083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46270832015-11-13 A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity Garton, Michael Najafabadi, Hamed S. Schmitges, Frank W. Radovani, Ernest Hughes, Timothy R. Kim, Philip M. Nucleic Acids Res Computational Biology Development of an accurate protein–DNA recognition code that can predict DNA specificity from protein sequence is a central problem in biology. C(2)H(2) zinc fingers constitute by far the largest family of DNA binding domains and their binding specificity has been studied intensively. However, despite decades of research, accurate prediction of DNA specificity remains elusive. A major obstacle is thought to be the inability of current methods to account for the influence of neighbouring domains. Here we show that this problem can be addressed using a structural approach: we build structural models for all C(2)H(2)-ZF–DNA complexes with known binding motifs and find six distinct binding modes. Each mode changes the orientation of specificity residues with respect to the DNA, thereby modulating base preference. Most importantly, the structural analysis shows that residues at the domain interface strongly and predictably influence the binding mode, and hence specificity. Accounting for predicted binding mode significantly improves prediction accuracy of predicted motifs. This new insight into the fundamental behaviour of C(2)H(2)-ZFs has implications for both improving the prediction of natural zinc finger-binding sites, and for prioritizing further experiments to complete the code. It also provides a new design feature for zinc finger engineering. Oxford University Press 2015-10-30 2015-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4627083/ /pubmed/26384429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv919 Text en © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Computational Biology
Garton, Michael
Najafabadi, Hamed S.
Schmitges, Frank W.
Radovani, Ernest
Hughes, Timothy R.
Kim, Philip M.
A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity
title A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity
title_full A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity
title_fullStr A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity
title_full_unstemmed A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity
title_short A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity
title_sort structural approach reveals how neighbouring c2h2 zinc fingers influence dna binding specificity
topic Computational Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26384429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv919
work_keys_str_mv AT gartonmichael astructuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity
AT najafabadihameds astructuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity
AT schmitgesfrankw astructuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity
AT radovaniernest astructuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity
AT hughestimothyr astructuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity
AT kimphilipm astructuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity
AT gartonmichael structuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity
AT najafabadihameds structuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity
AT schmitgesfrankw structuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity
AT radovaniernest structuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity
AT hughestimothyr structuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity
AT kimphilipm structuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity