Cargando…
A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity
Development of an accurate protein–DNA recognition code that can predict DNA specificity from protein sequence is a central problem in biology. C(2)H(2) zinc fingers constitute by far the largest family of DNA binding domains and their binding specificity has been studied intensively. However, despi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26384429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv919 |
_version_ | 1782398219448221696 |
---|---|
author | Garton, Michael Najafabadi, Hamed S. Schmitges, Frank W. Radovani, Ernest Hughes, Timothy R. Kim, Philip M. |
author_facet | Garton, Michael Najafabadi, Hamed S. Schmitges, Frank W. Radovani, Ernest Hughes, Timothy R. Kim, Philip M. |
author_sort | Garton, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Development of an accurate protein–DNA recognition code that can predict DNA specificity from protein sequence is a central problem in biology. C(2)H(2) zinc fingers constitute by far the largest family of DNA binding domains and their binding specificity has been studied intensively. However, despite decades of research, accurate prediction of DNA specificity remains elusive. A major obstacle is thought to be the inability of current methods to account for the influence of neighbouring domains. Here we show that this problem can be addressed using a structural approach: we build structural models for all C(2)H(2)-ZF–DNA complexes with known binding motifs and find six distinct binding modes. Each mode changes the orientation of specificity residues with respect to the DNA, thereby modulating base preference. Most importantly, the structural analysis shows that residues at the domain interface strongly and predictably influence the binding mode, and hence specificity. Accounting for predicted binding mode significantly improves prediction accuracy of predicted motifs. This new insight into the fundamental behaviour of C(2)H(2)-ZFs has implications for both improving the prediction of natural zinc finger-binding sites, and for prioritizing further experiments to complete the code. It also provides a new design feature for zinc finger engineering. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4627083 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46270832015-11-13 A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity Garton, Michael Najafabadi, Hamed S. Schmitges, Frank W. Radovani, Ernest Hughes, Timothy R. Kim, Philip M. Nucleic Acids Res Computational Biology Development of an accurate protein–DNA recognition code that can predict DNA specificity from protein sequence is a central problem in biology. C(2)H(2) zinc fingers constitute by far the largest family of DNA binding domains and their binding specificity has been studied intensively. However, despite decades of research, accurate prediction of DNA specificity remains elusive. A major obstacle is thought to be the inability of current methods to account for the influence of neighbouring domains. Here we show that this problem can be addressed using a structural approach: we build structural models for all C(2)H(2)-ZF–DNA complexes with known binding motifs and find six distinct binding modes. Each mode changes the orientation of specificity residues with respect to the DNA, thereby modulating base preference. Most importantly, the structural analysis shows that residues at the domain interface strongly and predictably influence the binding mode, and hence specificity. Accounting for predicted binding mode significantly improves prediction accuracy of predicted motifs. This new insight into the fundamental behaviour of C(2)H(2)-ZFs has implications for both improving the prediction of natural zinc finger-binding sites, and for prioritizing further experiments to complete the code. It also provides a new design feature for zinc finger engineering. Oxford University Press 2015-10-30 2015-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4627083/ /pubmed/26384429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv919 Text en © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Computational Biology Garton, Michael Najafabadi, Hamed S. Schmitges, Frank W. Radovani, Ernest Hughes, Timothy R. Kim, Philip M. A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity |
title | A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity |
title_full | A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity |
title_fullStr | A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity |
title_full_unstemmed | A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity |
title_short | A structural approach reveals how neighbouring C2H2 zinc fingers influence DNA binding specificity |
title_sort | structural approach reveals how neighbouring c2h2 zinc fingers influence dna binding specificity |
topic | Computational Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26384429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv919 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gartonmichael astructuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity AT najafabadihameds astructuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity AT schmitgesfrankw astructuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity AT radovaniernest astructuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity AT hughestimothyr astructuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity AT kimphilipm astructuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity AT gartonmichael structuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity AT najafabadihameds structuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity AT schmitgesfrankw structuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity AT radovaniernest structuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity AT hughestimothyr structuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity AT kimphilipm structuralapproachrevealshowneighbouringc2h2zincfingersinfluencednabindingspecificity |