Cargando…
Influence of Native and Non-Native Multitalker Babble on Speech Recognition in Noise
The aim of the study was to assess speech recognition in noise using multitalker babble of native and non-native language at two different signal to noise ratios. The speech recognition in noise was assessed on 60 participants (18 to 30 years) with normal hearing sensitivity, having Malayalam and Ka...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557350 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2014.89 |
_version_ | 1782398231395696640 |
---|---|
author | Jain, Chandni Konadath, Sreeraj Vimal, Bharathi M. Suresh, Vidhya |
author_facet | Jain, Chandni Konadath, Sreeraj Vimal, Bharathi M. Suresh, Vidhya |
author_sort | Jain, Chandni |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the study was to assess speech recognition in noise using multitalker babble of native and non-native language at two different signal to noise ratios. The speech recognition in noise was assessed on 60 participants (18 to 30 years) with normal hearing sensitivity, having Malayalam and Kannada as their native language. For this purpose, 6 and 10 multitalker babble were generated in Kannada and Malayalam language. Speech recognition was assessed for native listeners of both the languages in the presence of native and non-native multitalker babble. Results showed that the speech recognition in noise was significantly higher for 0 dB signal to noise ratio (SNR) compared to -3 dB SNR for both the languages. Performance of Kannada Listeners was significantly higher in the presence of native (Kannada) babble compared to non-native babble (Malayalam). However, this was not same with the Malayalam listeners wherein they performed equally well with native (Malayalam) as well as non-native babble (Kannada). The results of the present study highlight the importance of using native multitalker babble for Kannada listeners in lieu of non-native babble and, considering the importance of each SNR for estimating speech recognition in noise scores. Further research is needed to assess speech recognition in Malayalam listeners in the presence of other non-native backgrounds of various types. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4627136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46271362015-11-09 Influence of Native and Non-Native Multitalker Babble on Speech Recognition in Noise Jain, Chandni Konadath, Sreeraj Vimal, Bharathi M. Suresh, Vidhya Audiol Res Article The aim of the study was to assess speech recognition in noise using multitalker babble of native and non-native language at two different signal to noise ratios. The speech recognition in noise was assessed on 60 participants (18 to 30 years) with normal hearing sensitivity, having Malayalam and Kannada as their native language. For this purpose, 6 and 10 multitalker babble were generated in Kannada and Malayalam language. Speech recognition was assessed for native listeners of both the languages in the presence of native and non-native multitalker babble. Results showed that the speech recognition in noise was significantly higher for 0 dB signal to noise ratio (SNR) compared to -3 dB SNR for both the languages. Performance of Kannada Listeners was significantly higher in the presence of native (Kannada) babble compared to non-native babble (Malayalam). However, this was not same with the Malayalam listeners wherein they performed equally well with native (Malayalam) as well as non-native babble (Kannada). The results of the present study highlight the importance of using native multitalker babble for Kannada listeners in lieu of non-native babble and, considering the importance of each SNR for estimating speech recognition in noise scores. Further research is needed to assess speech recognition in Malayalam listeners in the presence of other non-native backgrounds of various types. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2014-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4627136/ /pubmed/26557350 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2014.89 Text en ©Copyright C. Jain et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Jain, Chandni Konadath, Sreeraj Vimal, Bharathi M. Suresh, Vidhya Influence of Native and Non-Native Multitalker Babble on Speech Recognition in Noise |
title | Influence of Native and Non-Native Multitalker Babble on Speech Recognition in Noise |
title_full | Influence of Native and Non-Native Multitalker Babble on Speech Recognition in Noise |
title_fullStr | Influence of Native and Non-Native Multitalker Babble on Speech Recognition in Noise |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Native and Non-Native Multitalker Babble on Speech Recognition in Noise |
title_short | Influence of Native and Non-Native Multitalker Babble on Speech Recognition in Noise |
title_sort | influence of native and non-native multitalker babble on speech recognition in noise |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557350 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2014.89 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jainchandni influenceofnativeandnonnativemultitalkerbabbleonspeechrecognitioninnoise AT konadathsreeraj influenceofnativeandnonnativemultitalkerbabbleonspeechrecognitioninnoise AT vimalbharathim influenceofnativeandnonnativemultitalkerbabbleonspeechrecognitioninnoise AT sureshvidhya influenceofnativeandnonnativemultitalkerbabbleonspeechrecognitioninnoise |