Cargando…

Visual search in depth: The neural correlates of segmenting a display into relevant and irrelevant three-dimensional regions

Visual perception is facilitated by the ability to selectively attend to relevant parts of the world and to ignore irrelevant regions or features. In visual search tasks, viewers are able to segment displays into relevant and irrelevant items based on a number of factors including the colour, motion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Katherine L., Allen, Harriet A., Dent, Kevin, Humphreys, Glyn W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26220748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.052
_version_ 1782398279577763840
author Roberts, Katherine L.
Allen, Harriet A.
Dent, Kevin
Humphreys, Glyn W.
author_facet Roberts, Katherine L.
Allen, Harriet A.
Dent, Kevin
Humphreys, Glyn W.
author_sort Roberts, Katherine L.
collection PubMed
description Visual perception is facilitated by the ability to selectively attend to relevant parts of the world and to ignore irrelevant regions or features. In visual search tasks, viewers are able to segment displays into relevant and irrelevant items based on a number of factors including the colour, motion, and temporal onset of the target and distractors. Understanding the process by which viewers prioritise relevant parts of a display can provide insights into the effect of top-down control on visual perception. Here, we investigate the behavioural and neural correlates of segmenting a display according to the expected three-dimensional (3D) location of a target. We ask whether this segmentation is based on low-level visual features (e.g. common depth or common surface) or on higher-order representations of 3D regions. Similar response-time benefits and neural activity were obtained when items fell on common surfaces or within depth-defined volumes, and when displays were vertical (such that items shared a common depth/disparity) or were tilted in depth. These similarities indicate that segmenting items according to their 3D location is based on attending to a 3D region, rather than a specific depth or surface. Segmenting the items in depth was mainly associated with increased activation in depth-sensitive parietal regions rather than in depth-sensitive visual regions. We conclude that segmenting items in depth is primarily achieved via higher-order, cue invariant representations rather than through filtering in lower-level perceptual regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4627361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46273612015-11-30 Visual search in depth: The neural correlates of segmenting a display into relevant and irrelevant three-dimensional regions Roberts, Katherine L. Allen, Harriet A. Dent, Kevin Humphreys, Glyn W. Neuroimage Article Visual perception is facilitated by the ability to selectively attend to relevant parts of the world and to ignore irrelevant regions or features. In visual search tasks, viewers are able to segment displays into relevant and irrelevant items based on a number of factors including the colour, motion, and temporal onset of the target and distractors. Understanding the process by which viewers prioritise relevant parts of a display can provide insights into the effect of top-down control on visual perception. Here, we investigate the behavioural and neural correlates of segmenting a display according to the expected three-dimensional (3D) location of a target. We ask whether this segmentation is based on low-level visual features (e.g. common depth or common surface) or on higher-order representations of 3D regions. Similar response-time benefits and neural activity were obtained when items fell on common surfaces or within depth-defined volumes, and when displays were vertical (such that items shared a common depth/disparity) or were tilted in depth. These similarities indicate that segmenting items according to their 3D location is based on attending to a 3D region, rather than a specific depth or surface. Segmenting the items in depth was mainly associated with increased activation in depth-sensitive parietal regions rather than in depth-sensitive visual regions. We conclude that segmenting items in depth is primarily achieved via higher-order, cue invariant representations rather than through filtering in lower-level perceptual regions. Academic Press 2015-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4627361/ /pubmed/26220748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.052 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Roberts, Katherine L.
Allen, Harriet A.
Dent, Kevin
Humphreys, Glyn W.
Visual search in depth: The neural correlates of segmenting a display into relevant and irrelevant three-dimensional regions
title Visual search in depth: The neural correlates of segmenting a display into relevant and irrelevant three-dimensional regions
title_full Visual search in depth: The neural correlates of segmenting a display into relevant and irrelevant three-dimensional regions
title_fullStr Visual search in depth: The neural correlates of segmenting a display into relevant and irrelevant three-dimensional regions
title_full_unstemmed Visual search in depth: The neural correlates of segmenting a display into relevant and irrelevant three-dimensional regions
title_short Visual search in depth: The neural correlates of segmenting a display into relevant and irrelevant three-dimensional regions
title_sort visual search in depth: the neural correlates of segmenting a display into relevant and irrelevant three-dimensional regions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26220748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.052
work_keys_str_mv AT robertskatherinel visualsearchindepththeneuralcorrelatesofsegmentingadisplayintorelevantandirrelevantthreedimensionalregions
AT allenharrieta visualsearchindepththeneuralcorrelatesofsegmentingadisplayintorelevantandirrelevantthreedimensionalregions
AT dentkevin visualsearchindepththeneuralcorrelatesofsegmentingadisplayintorelevantandirrelevantthreedimensionalregions
AT humphreysglynw visualsearchindepththeneuralcorrelatesofsegmentingadisplayintorelevantandirrelevantthreedimensionalregions