Cargando…
Adverse pregnancy outcomes in rural Uganda (1996–2013): trends and associated factors from serial cross sectional surveys
OBJECTIVE: Community based evidence on pregnancy outcomes in rural Africa is lacking yet it is needed to guide maternal and child health interventions. We estimated and compared adverse pregnancy outcomes and associated factors in rural south-western Uganda using two survey methods. METHODS: Within...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26515763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0708-8 |
_version_ | 1782398282581934080 |
---|---|
author | Asiki, Gershim Baisley, Kathy Newton, Rob Marions, Lena Seeley, Janet Kamali, Anatoli Smedman, Lars |
author_facet | Asiki, Gershim Baisley, Kathy Newton, Rob Marions, Lena Seeley, Janet Kamali, Anatoli Smedman, Lars |
author_sort | Asiki, Gershim |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Community based evidence on pregnancy outcomes in rural Africa is lacking yet it is needed to guide maternal and child health interventions. We estimated and compared adverse pregnancy outcomes and associated factors in rural south-western Uganda using two survey methods. METHODS: Within a general population cohort, between 1996 and 2013, women aged 15–49 years were interviewed on their pregnancy outcome in the past 12 months (method 1). During 2012–13, women in the same cohort were interviewed on their lifetime experience of pregnancy outcomes (method 2). Adverse pregnancy outcome was defined as abortions or stillbirths. We used random effects logistic regression for method 1 and negative binomial regression with robust clustered standard errors for method 2 to explore factors associated with adverse outcome. RESULTS: One third of women reported an adverse pregnancy outcome; 10.8 % (abortion = 8.4 %, stillbirth = 2.4 %) by method 1 and 8.5 % (abortion = 7.2 %, stillbirth = 1.3 %) by method 2. Abortion rates were similar (10.8 vs 10.5) per 1000 women and stillbirth rates differed (26.2 vs 13.8) per 1000 births by methods 1 and 2 respectively. Abortion risk increased with age of mother, non-attendance of antenatal care and proximity to the road. Lifetime stillbirth risk increased with age. Abortion and stillbirth risk reduced with increasing parity. DISCUSSION: Both methods had a high level of agreement in estimating abortion rate but were markedly below national estimates. Stillbirth rate estimated by method 1 was double that estimated by method 2 but method 1 estimate was more consistent with the national estimates. CONCLUSION: Strategies to improve prospective community level data collection to reduce reporting biases are needed to guide maternal health interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0708-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4627380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46273802015-10-31 Adverse pregnancy outcomes in rural Uganda (1996–2013): trends and associated factors from serial cross sectional surveys Asiki, Gershim Baisley, Kathy Newton, Rob Marions, Lena Seeley, Janet Kamali, Anatoli Smedman, Lars BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article OBJECTIVE: Community based evidence on pregnancy outcomes in rural Africa is lacking yet it is needed to guide maternal and child health interventions. We estimated and compared adverse pregnancy outcomes and associated factors in rural south-western Uganda using two survey methods. METHODS: Within a general population cohort, between 1996 and 2013, women aged 15–49 years were interviewed on their pregnancy outcome in the past 12 months (method 1). During 2012–13, women in the same cohort were interviewed on their lifetime experience of pregnancy outcomes (method 2). Adverse pregnancy outcome was defined as abortions or stillbirths. We used random effects logistic regression for method 1 and negative binomial regression with robust clustered standard errors for method 2 to explore factors associated with adverse outcome. RESULTS: One third of women reported an adverse pregnancy outcome; 10.8 % (abortion = 8.4 %, stillbirth = 2.4 %) by method 1 and 8.5 % (abortion = 7.2 %, stillbirth = 1.3 %) by method 2. Abortion rates were similar (10.8 vs 10.5) per 1000 women and stillbirth rates differed (26.2 vs 13.8) per 1000 births by methods 1 and 2 respectively. Abortion risk increased with age of mother, non-attendance of antenatal care and proximity to the road. Lifetime stillbirth risk increased with age. Abortion and stillbirth risk reduced with increasing parity. DISCUSSION: Both methods had a high level of agreement in estimating abortion rate but were markedly below national estimates. Stillbirth rate estimated by method 1 was double that estimated by method 2 but method 1 estimate was more consistent with the national estimates. CONCLUSION: Strategies to improve prospective community level data collection to reduce reporting biases are needed to guide maternal health interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0708-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4627380/ /pubmed/26515763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0708-8 Text en © Asiki et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Asiki, Gershim Baisley, Kathy Newton, Rob Marions, Lena Seeley, Janet Kamali, Anatoli Smedman, Lars Adverse pregnancy outcomes in rural Uganda (1996–2013): trends and associated factors from serial cross sectional surveys |
title | Adverse pregnancy outcomes in rural Uganda (1996–2013): trends and associated factors from serial cross sectional surveys |
title_full | Adverse pregnancy outcomes in rural Uganda (1996–2013): trends and associated factors from serial cross sectional surveys |
title_fullStr | Adverse pregnancy outcomes in rural Uganda (1996–2013): trends and associated factors from serial cross sectional surveys |
title_full_unstemmed | Adverse pregnancy outcomes in rural Uganda (1996–2013): trends and associated factors from serial cross sectional surveys |
title_short | Adverse pregnancy outcomes in rural Uganda (1996–2013): trends and associated factors from serial cross sectional surveys |
title_sort | adverse pregnancy outcomes in rural uganda (1996–2013): trends and associated factors from serial cross sectional surveys |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26515763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0708-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asikigershim adversepregnancyoutcomesinruraluganda19962013trendsandassociatedfactorsfromserialcrosssectionalsurveys AT baisleykathy adversepregnancyoutcomesinruraluganda19962013trendsandassociatedfactorsfromserialcrosssectionalsurveys AT newtonrob adversepregnancyoutcomesinruraluganda19962013trendsandassociatedfactorsfromserialcrosssectionalsurveys AT marionslena adversepregnancyoutcomesinruraluganda19962013trendsandassociatedfactorsfromserialcrosssectionalsurveys AT seeleyjanet adversepregnancyoutcomesinruraluganda19962013trendsandassociatedfactorsfromserialcrosssectionalsurveys AT kamalianatoli adversepregnancyoutcomesinruraluganda19962013trendsandassociatedfactorsfromserialcrosssectionalsurveys AT smedmanlars adversepregnancyoutcomesinruraluganda19962013trendsandassociatedfactorsfromserialcrosssectionalsurveys |