Cargando…

Hard-to-reach populations of men who have sex with men and sex workers: a systematic review on sampling methods

BACKGROUND: In public health, hard-to-reach populations are often recruited by non-probabilistic sampling methods that produce biased results. In order to overcome this, several sampling methods have been improved and developed in the last years. The aim of this systematic review was to identify all...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barros, Ana B., Dias, Sonia F., Martins, Maria Rosario O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26518345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0129-9
_version_ 1782398285642727424
author Barros, Ana B.
Dias, Sonia F.
Martins, Maria Rosario O.
author_facet Barros, Ana B.
Dias, Sonia F.
Martins, Maria Rosario O.
author_sort Barros, Ana B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In public health, hard-to-reach populations are often recruited by non-probabilistic sampling methods that produce biased results. In order to overcome this, several sampling methods have been improved and developed in the last years. The aim of this systematic review was to identify all current methods used to survey most-at-risk populations of men who have sex with men and sex workers. The review also aimed to assess if there were any relations between the study populations and the sampling methods used to recruit them. Lastly, we wanted to assess if the number of publications originated in middle and low human development (MLHD) countries had been increasing in the last years. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases and a total of 268 published studies were included in the analysis. RESULTS: In this review, 11 recruitment methods were identified. Semi-probabilistic methods were used most commonly to survey men who have sex with men, and the use of the Internet was the method that gathered more respondents. We found that female sex workers were more frequently recruited through non-probabilistic methods than men who have sex with men (odds = 2.2; p < 0.05; confidence interval (CI) [1.1–4.2]). In the last 6 years, the number of studies based in middle and low human development countries increased more than the number of studies based in very high and high human development countries (odds = 2.5; p < 0.05; CI [1.3–4.9]). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic literature review identified 11 methods used to sample men who have sex with men and female sex workers. There is an association between the type of sampling method and the population being studied. The number of studies based in middle and low human development countries has increased in the last 6 years of this study. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0129-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4627393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46273932015-10-31 Hard-to-reach populations of men who have sex with men and sex workers: a systematic review on sampling methods Barros, Ana B. Dias, Sonia F. Martins, Maria Rosario O. Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: In public health, hard-to-reach populations are often recruited by non-probabilistic sampling methods that produce biased results. In order to overcome this, several sampling methods have been improved and developed in the last years. The aim of this systematic review was to identify all current methods used to survey most-at-risk populations of men who have sex with men and sex workers. The review also aimed to assess if there were any relations between the study populations and the sampling methods used to recruit them. Lastly, we wanted to assess if the number of publications originated in middle and low human development (MLHD) countries had been increasing in the last years. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases and a total of 268 published studies were included in the analysis. RESULTS: In this review, 11 recruitment methods were identified. Semi-probabilistic methods were used most commonly to survey men who have sex with men, and the use of the Internet was the method that gathered more respondents. We found that female sex workers were more frequently recruited through non-probabilistic methods than men who have sex with men (odds = 2.2; p < 0.05; confidence interval (CI) [1.1–4.2]). In the last 6 years, the number of studies based in middle and low human development countries increased more than the number of studies based in very high and high human development countries (odds = 2.5; p < 0.05; CI [1.3–4.9]). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic literature review identified 11 methods used to sample men who have sex with men and female sex workers. There is an association between the type of sampling method and the population being studied. The number of studies based in middle and low human development countries has increased in the last 6 years of this study. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0129-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4627393/ /pubmed/26518345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0129-9 Text en © Barros et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Barros, Ana B.
Dias, Sonia F.
Martins, Maria Rosario O.
Hard-to-reach populations of men who have sex with men and sex workers: a systematic review on sampling methods
title Hard-to-reach populations of men who have sex with men and sex workers: a systematic review on sampling methods
title_full Hard-to-reach populations of men who have sex with men and sex workers: a systematic review on sampling methods
title_fullStr Hard-to-reach populations of men who have sex with men and sex workers: a systematic review on sampling methods
title_full_unstemmed Hard-to-reach populations of men who have sex with men and sex workers: a systematic review on sampling methods
title_short Hard-to-reach populations of men who have sex with men and sex workers: a systematic review on sampling methods
title_sort hard-to-reach populations of men who have sex with men and sex workers: a systematic review on sampling methods
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26518345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0129-9
work_keys_str_mv AT barrosanab hardtoreachpopulationsofmenwhohavesexwithmenandsexworkersasystematicreviewonsamplingmethods
AT diassoniaf hardtoreachpopulationsofmenwhohavesexwithmenandsexworkersasystematicreviewonsamplingmethods
AT martinsmariarosarioo hardtoreachpopulationsofmenwhohavesexwithmenandsexworkersasystematicreviewonsamplingmethods