Cargando…
Contributions to a neurophysiology of meaning: the interpretation of written messages could be an automatic stimulus-reaction mechanism before becoming conscious processing of information
Background. Even though the interpretation of natural language messages is generally conceived as the result of a conscious processing of the message content, the influence of unconscious factors is also well known. What is still insufficiently known is the way such factors work. We have tackled int...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528419 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1361 |
_version_ | 1782398350794948608 |
---|---|
author | Maffei, Roberto Convertini, Livia S. Quatraro, Sabrina Ressa, Stefania Velasco, Annalisa |
author_facet | Maffei, Roberto Convertini, Livia S. Quatraro, Sabrina Ressa, Stefania Velasco, Annalisa |
author_sort | Maffei, Roberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Even though the interpretation of natural language messages is generally conceived as the result of a conscious processing of the message content, the influence of unconscious factors is also well known. What is still insufficiently known is the way such factors work. We have tackled interpretation assuming it is a process, whose basic features are the same for the whole humankind, and employing a naturalistic approach (careful observation of phenomena in conditions the closest to “natural” ones, and precise description before and independently of data statistical analysis). Methodology. Our field research involved a random sample of 102 adults. We presented them with a complete real world-like case of written communication using unabridged message texts. We collected data (participants’ written reports on their interpretations) in controlled conditions through a specially designed questionnaire (closed and opened answers); then, we treated it through qualitative and quantitative methods. Principal Findings. We gathered some evidence that, in written message interpretation, between reading and the attribution of conscious meaning, an intermediate step could exist (we named it “disassembling”) which looks like an automatic reaction to the text words/expressions. Thus, the process of interpretation would be a discontinuous sequence of three steps having different natures: the initial “decoding” step (i.e., reading, which requires technical abilities), disassembling (the automatic reaction, an unconscious passage) and the final conscious attribution of meaning. If this is true, words and expressions would firstly function like physical stimuli, before being taken into account as symbols. Such hypothesis, once confirmed, could help explaining some links between the cultural (human communication) and the biological (stimulus-reaction mechanisms as the basis for meanings) dimension of humankind. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4627920 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46279202015-11-02 Contributions to a neurophysiology of meaning: the interpretation of written messages could be an automatic stimulus-reaction mechanism before becoming conscious processing of information Maffei, Roberto Convertini, Livia S. Quatraro, Sabrina Ressa, Stefania Velasco, Annalisa PeerJ Neuroscience Background. Even though the interpretation of natural language messages is generally conceived as the result of a conscious processing of the message content, the influence of unconscious factors is also well known. What is still insufficiently known is the way such factors work. We have tackled interpretation assuming it is a process, whose basic features are the same for the whole humankind, and employing a naturalistic approach (careful observation of phenomena in conditions the closest to “natural” ones, and precise description before and independently of data statistical analysis). Methodology. Our field research involved a random sample of 102 adults. We presented them with a complete real world-like case of written communication using unabridged message texts. We collected data (participants’ written reports on their interpretations) in controlled conditions through a specially designed questionnaire (closed and opened answers); then, we treated it through qualitative and quantitative methods. Principal Findings. We gathered some evidence that, in written message interpretation, between reading and the attribution of conscious meaning, an intermediate step could exist (we named it “disassembling”) which looks like an automatic reaction to the text words/expressions. Thus, the process of interpretation would be a discontinuous sequence of three steps having different natures: the initial “decoding” step (i.e., reading, which requires technical abilities), disassembling (the automatic reaction, an unconscious passage) and the final conscious attribution of meaning. If this is true, words and expressions would firstly function like physical stimuli, before being taken into account as symbols. Such hypothesis, once confirmed, could help explaining some links between the cultural (human communication) and the biological (stimulus-reaction mechanisms as the basis for meanings) dimension of humankind. PeerJ Inc. 2015-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4627920/ /pubmed/26528419 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1361 Text en © 2015 Maffei et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Maffei, Roberto Convertini, Livia S. Quatraro, Sabrina Ressa, Stefania Velasco, Annalisa Contributions to a neurophysiology of meaning: the interpretation of written messages could be an automatic stimulus-reaction mechanism before becoming conscious processing of information |
title | Contributions to a neurophysiology of meaning: the interpretation of written messages could be an automatic stimulus-reaction mechanism before becoming conscious processing of information |
title_full | Contributions to a neurophysiology of meaning: the interpretation of written messages could be an automatic stimulus-reaction mechanism before becoming conscious processing of information |
title_fullStr | Contributions to a neurophysiology of meaning: the interpretation of written messages could be an automatic stimulus-reaction mechanism before becoming conscious processing of information |
title_full_unstemmed | Contributions to a neurophysiology of meaning: the interpretation of written messages could be an automatic stimulus-reaction mechanism before becoming conscious processing of information |
title_short | Contributions to a neurophysiology of meaning: the interpretation of written messages could be an automatic stimulus-reaction mechanism before becoming conscious processing of information |
title_sort | contributions to a neurophysiology of meaning: the interpretation of written messages could be an automatic stimulus-reaction mechanism before becoming conscious processing of information |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528419 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1361 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maffeiroberto contributionstoaneurophysiologyofmeaningtheinterpretationofwrittenmessagescouldbeanautomaticstimulusreactionmechanismbeforebecomingconsciousprocessingofinformation AT convertinilivias contributionstoaneurophysiologyofmeaningtheinterpretationofwrittenmessagescouldbeanautomaticstimulusreactionmechanismbeforebecomingconsciousprocessingofinformation AT quatrarosabrina contributionstoaneurophysiologyofmeaningtheinterpretationofwrittenmessagescouldbeanautomaticstimulusreactionmechanismbeforebecomingconsciousprocessingofinformation AT ressastefania contributionstoaneurophysiologyofmeaningtheinterpretationofwrittenmessagescouldbeanautomaticstimulusreactionmechanismbeforebecomingconsciousprocessingofinformation AT velascoannalisa contributionstoaneurophysiologyofmeaningtheinterpretationofwrittenmessagescouldbeanautomaticstimulusreactionmechanismbeforebecomingconsciousprocessingofinformation |