Cargando…

An evaluation of neurocognitive models of theory of mind

We review nine current neurocognitive theories of how theory of mind (ToM) is implemented in the brain and evaluate them based on the results from a recent meta-analysis by Schurz et al. (2014), where we identified six types of tasks that are the most frequently used in imaging research on ToM. From...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schurz, Matthias, Perner, Josef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26582995
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01610
_version_ 1782398384706945024
author Schurz, Matthias
Perner, Josef
author_facet Schurz, Matthias
Perner, Josef
author_sort Schurz, Matthias
collection PubMed
description We review nine current neurocognitive theories of how theory of mind (ToM) is implemented in the brain and evaluate them based on the results from a recent meta-analysis by Schurz et al. (2014), where we identified six types of tasks that are the most frequently used in imaging research on ToM. From theories about cognitive processes being associated with certain brain areas, we deduce predictions about which areas should be engaged by the different types of ToM tasks. We then compare these predictions with the observed activations in the meta-analysis, and identify a number of unexplained findings in current theories. These can be used to revise and improve future neurocognitive accounts of ToM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4628115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46281152015-11-18 An evaluation of neurocognitive models of theory of mind Schurz, Matthias Perner, Josef Front Psychol Psychology We review nine current neurocognitive theories of how theory of mind (ToM) is implemented in the brain and evaluate them based on the results from a recent meta-analysis by Schurz et al. (2014), where we identified six types of tasks that are the most frequently used in imaging research on ToM. From theories about cognitive processes being associated with certain brain areas, we deduce predictions about which areas should be engaged by the different types of ToM tasks. We then compare these predictions with the observed activations in the meta-analysis, and identify a number of unexplained findings in current theories. These can be used to revise and improve future neurocognitive accounts of ToM. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4628115/ /pubmed/26582995 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01610 Text en Copyright © 2015 Schurz and Perner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Schurz, Matthias
Perner, Josef
An evaluation of neurocognitive models of theory of mind
title An evaluation of neurocognitive models of theory of mind
title_full An evaluation of neurocognitive models of theory of mind
title_fullStr An evaluation of neurocognitive models of theory of mind
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of neurocognitive models of theory of mind
title_short An evaluation of neurocognitive models of theory of mind
title_sort evaluation of neurocognitive models of theory of mind
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26582995
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01610
work_keys_str_mv AT schurzmatthias anevaluationofneurocognitivemodelsoftheoryofmind
AT pernerjosef anevaluationofneurocognitivemodelsoftheoryofmind
AT schurzmatthias evaluationofneurocognitivemodelsoftheoryofmind
AT pernerjosef evaluationofneurocognitivemodelsoftheoryofmind