Cargando…

National health research systems in the WHO African Region: current status and the way forward

BACKGROUND: A number of resolutions of the World Health Assembly and the WHO Regional Committee for Africa call upon African countries and their development partners to make the required investments in national health research systems (NHRS) to generate knowledge and promote its use in tackling prio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirigia, Joses Muthuri, Ota, Martin Okechukwu, Motari, Marion, Bataringaya, Juliet Evelyn, Mouhouelo, Pascal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26519052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0054-3
_version_ 1782398433163739136
author Kirigia, Joses Muthuri
Ota, Martin Okechukwu
Motari, Marion
Bataringaya, Juliet Evelyn
Mouhouelo, Pascal
author_facet Kirigia, Joses Muthuri
Ota, Martin Okechukwu
Motari, Marion
Bataringaya, Juliet Evelyn
Mouhouelo, Pascal
author_sort Kirigia, Joses Muthuri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A number of resolutions of the World Health Assembly and the WHO Regional Committee for Africa call upon African countries and their development partners to make the required investments in national health research systems (NHRS) to generate knowledge and promote its use in tackling priority public health challenges. Implementation of these resolutions is critical for Africa to progress with the rest of the world in achieving the post-2015 health sustainable development goal. This study assesses the current status of some NHRS components in the 47 countries of the WHO African Region, identifies the factors that enable and constrain NHRS, and proposes the way forward. METHODS: To track progress in NHRS components and for comparison, a questionnaire that was used in NHRS surveys in 2003 and 2009 was administered in all 47 countries in the African Region. The national health research focal persons were responsible for completing the questionnaire, which had been hand-delivered to them by the WHO country office staff in charge of research, who also briefed them on the survey, went through the questionnaire for clarity, and sought their informed consent. RESULTS: All the 47 countries responded to the questionnaire, but some did not answer all questions. Of the countries responding to various questions 49 % (23/47) had a national health research policy; 47 % (22/47) had a health strategic plan; 40 % (19/47) had legislation governing research; 53 % (25/47) had a national health research priority agenda; 51 % (24/47) reported having a functional NHRS and a national health research management forum; 91 % (43/47) had an ethical review committee; 49 % (23/47) had hospitals with ethical review committees to review clinical research proposals; 51 % (24/47) had a scientific review committee; 62 % (29/47) had health institutions with scientific review committees; 83 % (39/47) had a national health research focal point; 51 % (24/47) had a health research programme; 55 % (26/47) had a national health or medical research institute or council; 93 % (41/44) had at least one university faculty of health sciences that conducted health research; and 33 % (15/46) had a knowledge translation platform. Forty-seven percent of countries reported having a budget line for research for health in the ministry of health budget. Between 2003 and 2014, the countries with a functional NHRS increased from 30 % to 51 %. CONCLUSION: Compared with 2003 and 2009 surveys, our survey found many countries to have made progress in strengthening some of the functions of their NHRS. However, there remains an urgent need for countries without NHRS to establish them and for others to improve the functionality and efficiency of every NHRS component. This is necessary for the national governments to effectively execute their leadership and governance of NHRS and to create an enabling environment within which research for health can flourish. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0054-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4628337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46283372015-11-01 National health research systems in the WHO African Region: current status and the way forward Kirigia, Joses Muthuri Ota, Martin Okechukwu Motari, Marion Bataringaya, Juliet Evelyn Mouhouelo, Pascal Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: A number of resolutions of the World Health Assembly and the WHO Regional Committee for Africa call upon African countries and their development partners to make the required investments in national health research systems (NHRS) to generate knowledge and promote its use in tackling priority public health challenges. Implementation of these resolutions is critical for Africa to progress with the rest of the world in achieving the post-2015 health sustainable development goal. This study assesses the current status of some NHRS components in the 47 countries of the WHO African Region, identifies the factors that enable and constrain NHRS, and proposes the way forward. METHODS: To track progress in NHRS components and for comparison, a questionnaire that was used in NHRS surveys in 2003 and 2009 was administered in all 47 countries in the African Region. The national health research focal persons were responsible for completing the questionnaire, which had been hand-delivered to them by the WHO country office staff in charge of research, who also briefed them on the survey, went through the questionnaire for clarity, and sought their informed consent. RESULTS: All the 47 countries responded to the questionnaire, but some did not answer all questions. Of the countries responding to various questions 49 % (23/47) had a national health research policy; 47 % (22/47) had a health strategic plan; 40 % (19/47) had legislation governing research; 53 % (25/47) had a national health research priority agenda; 51 % (24/47) reported having a functional NHRS and a national health research management forum; 91 % (43/47) had an ethical review committee; 49 % (23/47) had hospitals with ethical review committees to review clinical research proposals; 51 % (24/47) had a scientific review committee; 62 % (29/47) had health institutions with scientific review committees; 83 % (39/47) had a national health research focal point; 51 % (24/47) had a health research programme; 55 % (26/47) had a national health or medical research institute or council; 93 % (41/44) had at least one university faculty of health sciences that conducted health research; and 33 % (15/46) had a knowledge translation platform. Forty-seven percent of countries reported having a budget line for research for health in the ministry of health budget. Between 2003 and 2014, the countries with a functional NHRS increased from 30 % to 51 %. CONCLUSION: Compared with 2003 and 2009 surveys, our survey found many countries to have made progress in strengthening some of the functions of their NHRS. However, there remains an urgent need for countries without NHRS to establish them and for others to improve the functionality and efficiency of every NHRS component. This is necessary for the national governments to effectively execute their leadership and governance of NHRS and to create an enabling environment within which research for health can flourish. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0054-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4628337/ /pubmed/26519052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0054-3 Text en © Kirigia et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kirigia, Joses Muthuri
Ota, Martin Okechukwu
Motari, Marion
Bataringaya, Juliet Evelyn
Mouhouelo, Pascal
National health research systems in the WHO African Region: current status and the way forward
title National health research systems in the WHO African Region: current status and the way forward
title_full National health research systems in the WHO African Region: current status and the way forward
title_fullStr National health research systems in the WHO African Region: current status and the way forward
title_full_unstemmed National health research systems in the WHO African Region: current status and the way forward
title_short National health research systems in the WHO African Region: current status and the way forward
title_sort national health research systems in the who african region: current status and the way forward
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26519052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0054-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kirigiajosesmuthuri nationalhealthresearchsystemsinthewhoafricanregioncurrentstatusandthewayforward
AT otamartinokechukwu nationalhealthresearchsystemsinthewhoafricanregioncurrentstatusandthewayforward
AT motarimarion nationalhealthresearchsystemsinthewhoafricanregioncurrentstatusandthewayforward
AT bataringayajulietevelyn nationalhealthresearchsystemsinthewhoafricanregioncurrentstatusandthewayforward
AT mouhouelopascal nationalhealthresearchsystemsinthewhoafricanregioncurrentstatusandthewayforward