Cargando…
Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an alternative to post-operative whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) following resection of brain metastases. At our institution, CyberKnife (CK) is considered for local treatment of large cavities ≥2 cm. In this study, we aimed to evaluate patterns of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26520568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0523-4 |
_version_ | 1782398435988602880 |
---|---|
author | Vogel, Jennifer Ojerholm, Eric Hollander, Andrew Briola, Cynthia Mooij, Rob Bieda, Michael Kolker, James Nagda, Suneel Geiger, Geoffrey Dorsey, Jay Lustig, Robert O’Rourke, Donald M. Brem, Steven Lee, John Alonso-Basanta, Michelle |
author_facet | Vogel, Jennifer Ojerholm, Eric Hollander, Andrew Briola, Cynthia Mooij, Rob Bieda, Michael Kolker, James Nagda, Suneel Geiger, Geoffrey Dorsey, Jay Lustig, Robert O’Rourke, Donald M. Brem, Steven Lee, John Alonso-Basanta, Michelle |
author_sort | Vogel, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an alternative to post-operative whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) following resection of brain metastases. At our institution, CyberKnife (CK) is considered for local treatment of large cavities ≥2 cm. In this study, we aimed to evaluate patterns of failure and characterize patients best suited to treatment with this approach. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients treated with CK to 33 resection cavities ≥2 cm between 2011 and 2014. Patterns of intracranial failure were analyzed in 26 patients with post-treatment imaging. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors examined with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The most frequent histologies were lung (43 %) and breast (20 %). Median treatment volume was 25.1 cm(3) (range 4.7–90.9 cm(3)) and median maximal postoperative cavity diameter was 3.8 cm (range 2.8–6.7). The most common treatment was 30 Gy in 5 fractions prescribed to the 75 % isodose line. Median follow up for the entire cohort was 9.5 months (range 1.0–34.3). Local failure developed in 7 treated cavities (24 %). Neither cavity volume nor CK treatment volume was associated with local failure. Distant brain failure occurred in 20 cases (62 %) at a median of 4.2 months. There were increased rates of distant failure in patients who initially presented with synchronous metastases (p = 0.02). Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) developed in 9 cases, (34 %). Salvage WBRT was performed in 5 cases (17 %) at a median of 5.2 months from CK. Median overall survival was 10.1 months from treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that adjuvant CK is a reasonable strategy to achieve local control in large resection cavities. Patients with synchronous metastases at the time of CK may be at higher risk for distant brain failure. The majority of cases were spared or delayed WBRT with the use of local CK therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4628349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46283492015-11-01 Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases Vogel, Jennifer Ojerholm, Eric Hollander, Andrew Briola, Cynthia Mooij, Rob Bieda, Michael Kolker, James Nagda, Suneel Geiger, Geoffrey Dorsey, Jay Lustig, Robert O’Rourke, Donald M. Brem, Steven Lee, John Alonso-Basanta, Michelle Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an alternative to post-operative whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) following resection of brain metastases. At our institution, CyberKnife (CK) is considered for local treatment of large cavities ≥2 cm. In this study, we aimed to evaluate patterns of failure and characterize patients best suited to treatment with this approach. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients treated with CK to 33 resection cavities ≥2 cm between 2011 and 2014. Patterns of intracranial failure were analyzed in 26 patients with post-treatment imaging. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors examined with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The most frequent histologies were lung (43 %) and breast (20 %). Median treatment volume was 25.1 cm(3) (range 4.7–90.9 cm(3)) and median maximal postoperative cavity diameter was 3.8 cm (range 2.8–6.7). The most common treatment was 30 Gy in 5 fractions prescribed to the 75 % isodose line. Median follow up for the entire cohort was 9.5 months (range 1.0–34.3). Local failure developed in 7 treated cavities (24 %). Neither cavity volume nor CK treatment volume was associated with local failure. Distant brain failure occurred in 20 cases (62 %) at a median of 4.2 months. There were increased rates of distant failure in patients who initially presented with synchronous metastases (p = 0.02). Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) developed in 9 cases, (34 %). Salvage WBRT was performed in 5 cases (17 %) at a median of 5.2 months from CK. Median overall survival was 10.1 months from treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that adjuvant CK is a reasonable strategy to achieve local control in large resection cavities. Patients with synchronous metastases at the time of CK may be at higher risk for distant brain failure. The majority of cases were spared or delayed WBRT with the use of local CK therapy. BioMed Central 2015-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4628349/ /pubmed/26520568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0523-4 Text en © Vogel et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Vogel, Jennifer Ojerholm, Eric Hollander, Andrew Briola, Cynthia Mooij, Rob Bieda, Michael Kolker, James Nagda, Suneel Geiger, Geoffrey Dorsey, Jay Lustig, Robert O’Rourke, Donald M. Brem, Steven Lee, John Alonso-Basanta, Michelle Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases |
title | Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases |
title_full | Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases |
title_fullStr | Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases |
title_full_unstemmed | Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases |
title_short | Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases |
title_sort | intracranial control after cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26520568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0523-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vogeljennifer intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases AT ojerholmeric intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases AT hollanderandrew intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases AT briolacynthia intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases AT mooijrob intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases AT biedamichael intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases AT kolkerjames intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases AT nagdasuneel intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases AT geigergeoffrey intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases AT dorseyjay intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases AT lustigrobert intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases AT orourkedonaldm intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases AT bremsteven intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases AT leejohn intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases AT alonsobasantamichelle intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases |