Cargando…

Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an alternative to post-operative whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) following resection of brain metastases. At our institution, CyberKnife (CK) is considered for local treatment of large cavities ≥2 cm. In this study, we aimed to evaluate patterns of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vogel, Jennifer, Ojerholm, Eric, Hollander, Andrew, Briola, Cynthia, Mooij, Rob, Bieda, Michael, Kolker, James, Nagda, Suneel, Geiger, Geoffrey, Dorsey, Jay, Lustig, Robert, O’Rourke, Donald M., Brem, Steven, Lee, John, Alonso-Basanta, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26520568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0523-4
_version_ 1782398435988602880
author Vogel, Jennifer
Ojerholm, Eric
Hollander, Andrew
Briola, Cynthia
Mooij, Rob
Bieda, Michael
Kolker, James
Nagda, Suneel
Geiger, Geoffrey
Dorsey, Jay
Lustig, Robert
O’Rourke, Donald M.
Brem, Steven
Lee, John
Alonso-Basanta, Michelle
author_facet Vogel, Jennifer
Ojerholm, Eric
Hollander, Andrew
Briola, Cynthia
Mooij, Rob
Bieda, Michael
Kolker, James
Nagda, Suneel
Geiger, Geoffrey
Dorsey, Jay
Lustig, Robert
O’Rourke, Donald M.
Brem, Steven
Lee, John
Alonso-Basanta, Michelle
author_sort Vogel, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an alternative to post-operative whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) following resection of brain metastases. At our institution, CyberKnife (CK) is considered for local treatment of large cavities ≥2 cm. In this study, we aimed to evaluate patterns of failure and characterize patients best suited to treatment with this approach. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients treated with CK to 33 resection cavities ≥2 cm between 2011 and 2014. Patterns of intracranial failure were analyzed in 26 patients with post-treatment imaging. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors examined with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The most frequent histologies were lung (43 %) and breast (20 %). Median treatment volume was 25.1 cm(3) (range 4.7–90.9 cm(3)) and median maximal postoperative cavity diameter was 3.8 cm (range 2.8–6.7). The most common treatment was 30 Gy in 5 fractions prescribed to the 75 % isodose line. Median follow up for the entire cohort was 9.5 months (range 1.0–34.3). Local failure developed in 7 treated cavities (24 %). Neither cavity volume nor CK treatment volume was associated with local failure. Distant brain failure occurred in 20 cases (62 %) at a median of 4.2 months. There were increased rates of distant failure in patients who initially presented with synchronous metastases (p = 0.02). Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) developed in 9 cases, (34 %). Salvage WBRT was performed in 5 cases (17 %) at a median of 5.2 months from CK. Median overall survival was 10.1 months from treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that adjuvant CK is a reasonable strategy to achieve local control in large resection cavities. Patients with synchronous metastases at the time of CK may be at higher risk for distant brain failure. The majority of cases were spared or delayed WBRT with the use of local CK therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4628349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46283492015-11-01 Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases Vogel, Jennifer Ojerholm, Eric Hollander, Andrew Briola, Cynthia Mooij, Rob Bieda, Michael Kolker, James Nagda, Suneel Geiger, Geoffrey Dorsey, Jay Lustig, Robert O’Rourke, Donald M. Brem, Steven Lee, John Alonso-Basanta, Michelle Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an alternative to post-operative whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) following resection of brain metastases. At our institution, CyberKnife (CK) is considered for local treatment of large cavities ≥2 cm. In this study, we aimed to evaluate patterns of failure and characterize patients best suited to treatment with this approach. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients treated with CK to 33 resection cavities ≥2 cm between 2011 and 2014. Patterns of intracranial failure were analyzed in 26 patients with post-treatment imaging. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors examined with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The most frequent histologies were lung (43 %) and breast (20 %). Median treatment volume was 25.1 cm(3) (range 4.7–90.9 cm(3)) and median maximal postoperative cavity diameter was 3.8 cm (range 2.8–6.7). The most common treatment was 30 Gy in 5 fractions prescribed to the 75 % isodose line. Median follow up for the entire cohort was 9.5 months (range 1.0–34.3). Local failure developed in 7 treated cavities (24 %). Neither cavity volume nor CK treatment volume was associated with local failure. Distant brain failure occurred in 20 cases (62 %) at a median of 4.2 months. There were increased rates of distant failure in patients who initially presented with synchronous metastases (p = 0.02). Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) developed in 9 cases, (34 %). Salvage WBRT was performed in 5 cases (17 %) at a median of 5.2 months from CK. Median overall survival was 10.1 months from treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that adjuvant CK is a reasonable strategy to achieve local control in large resection cavities. Patients with synchronous metastases at the time of CK may be at higher risk for distant brain failure. The majority of cases were spared or delayed WBRT with the use of local CK therapy. BioMed Central 2015-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4628349/ /pubmed/26520568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0523-4 Text en © Vogel et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Vogel, Jennifer
Ojerholm, Eric
Hollander, Andrew
Briola, Cynthia
Mooij, Rob
Bieda, Michael
Kolker, James
Nagda, Suneel
Geiger, Geoffrey
Dorsey, Jay
Lustig, Robert
O’Rourke, Donald M.
Brem, Steven
Lee, John
Alonso-Basanta, Michelle
Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases
title Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases
title_full Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases
title_fullStr Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases
title_full_unstemmed Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases
title_short Intracranial control after Cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases
title_sort intracranial control after cyberknife radiosurgery to the resection bed for large brain metastases
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26520568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0523-4
work_keys_str_mv AT vogeljennifer intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases
AT ojerholmeric intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases
AT hollanderandrew intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases
AT briolacynthia intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases
AT mooijrob intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases
AT biedamichael intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases
AT kolkerjames intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases
AT nagdasuneel intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases
AT geigergeoffrey intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases
AT dorseyjay intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases
AT lustigrobert intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases
AT orourkedonaldm intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases
AT bremsteven intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases
AT leejohn intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases
AT alonsobasantamichelle intracranialcontrolaftercyberkniferadiosurgerytotheresectionbedforlargebrainmetastases