Cargando…

Validation of a dose warping algorithm using clinically realistic scenarios

OBJECTIVE: Dose warping following deformable image registration (DIR) has been proposed for interfractional dose accumulation. Robust evaluation workflows are vital to clinically implement such procedures. This study demonstrates such a workflow and quantifies the accuracy of a commercial DIR algori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roussakis, Y G, Dehghani, H, Green, S, Webster, G J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25791569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140691
_version_ 1782398449394647040
author Roussakis, Y G
Dehghani, H
Green, S
Webster, G J
author_facet Roussakis, Y G
Dehghani, H
Green, S
Webster, G J
author_sort Roussakis, Y G
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Dose warping following deformable image registration (DIR) has been proposed for interfractional dose accumulation. Robust evaluation workflows are vital to clinically implement such procedures. This study demonstrates such a workflow and quantifies the accuracy of a commercial DIR algorithm for this purpose under clinically realistic scenarios. METHODS: 12 head and neck (H&N) patient data sets were used for this retrospective study. For each case, four clinically relevant anatomical changes have been manually generated. Dose distributions were then calculated on each artificially deformed image and warped back to the original anatomy following DIR by a commercial algorithm. Spatial registration was evaluated by quantitative comparison of the original and warped structure sets, using conformity index and mean distance to conformity (MDC) metrics. Dosimetric evaluation was performed by quantitative comparison of the dose–volume histograms generated for the calculated and warped dose distributions, which should be identical for the ideal “perfect” registration of mass-conserving deformations. RESULTS: Spatial registration of the artificially deformed image back to the planning CT was accurate (MDC range of 1–2 voxels or 1.2–2.4 mm). Dosimetric discrepancies introduced by the DIR were low (0.02 ± 0.03 Gy per fraction in clinically relevant dose metrics) with no statistically significant difference found (Wilcoxon test, 0.6 ≥ p ≥ 0.2). CONCLUSION: The reliability of CT-to-CT DIR-based dose warping and image registration was demonstrated for a commercial algorithm with H&N patient data. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study demonstrates a workflow for validation of dose warping following DIR that could assist physicists and physicians in quantifying the uncertainties associated with dose accumulation in clinical scenarios.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4628476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46284762016-05-01 Validation of a dose warping algorithm using clinically realistic scenarios Roussakis, Y G Dehghani, H Green, S Webster, G J Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: Dose warping following deformable image registration (DIR) has been proposed for interfractional dose accumulation. Robust evaluation workflows are vital to clinically implement such procedures. This study demonstrates such a workflow and quantifies the accuracy of a commercial DIR algorithm for this purpose under clinically realistic scenarios. METHODS: 12 head and neck (H&N) patient data sets were used for this retrospective study. For each case, four clinically relevant anatomical changes have been manually generated. Dose distributions were then calculated on each artificially deformed image and warped back to the original anatomy following DIR by a commercial algorithm. Spatial registration was evaluated by quantitative comparison of the original and warped structure sets, using conformity index and mean distance to conformity (MDC) metrics. Dosimetric evaluation was performed by quantitative comparison of the dose–volume histograms generated for the calculated and warped dose distributions, which should be identical for the ideal “perfect” registration of mass-conserving deformations. RESULTS: Spatial registration of the artificially deformed image back to the planning CT was accurate (MDC range of 1–2 voxels or 1.2–2.4 mm). Dosimetric discrepancies introduced by the DIR were low (0.02 ± 0.03 Gy per fraction in clinically relevant dose metrics) with no statistically significant difference found (Wilcoxon test, 0.6 ≥ p ≥ 0.2). CONCLUSION: The reliability of CT-to-CT DIR-based dose warping and image registration was demonstrated for a commercial algorithm with H&N patient data. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study demonstrates a workflow for validation of dose warping following DIR that could assist physicists and physicians in quantifying the uncertainties associated with dose accumulation in clinical scenarios. The British Institute of Radiology. 2015-05 2015-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4628476/ /pubmed/25791569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140691 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Roussakis, Y G
Dehghani, H
Green, S
Webster, G J
Validation of a dose warping algorithm using clinically realistic scenarios
title Validation of a dose warping algorithm using clinically realistic scenarios
title_full Validation of a dose warping algorithm using clinically realistic scenarios
title_fullStr Validation of a dose warping algorithm using clinically realistic scenarios
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a dose warping algorithm using clinically realistic scenarios
title_short Validation of a dose warping algorithm using clinically realistic scenarios
title_sort validation of a dose warping algorithm using clinically realistic scenarios
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25791569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140691
work_keys_str_mv AT roussakisyg validationofadosewarpingalgorithmusingclinicallyrealisticscenarios
AT dehghanih validationofadosewarpingalgorithmusingclinicallyrealisticscenarios
AT greens validationofadosewarpingalgorithmusingclinicallyrealisticscenarios
AT webstergj validationofadosewarpingalgorithmusingclinicallyrealisticscenarios