Cargando…

Consequences of additional use of contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT in target volume delineation and dose distribution for pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE: To compare the differences between contrast-enhanced (CE) fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and CECT in target volume delineation and radiotherapy (RT) dose distribution, and to evaluate the sparing of organs at risk (OARs) in the treatment plan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, X-X, Liu, N-B, Zhu, L, Yuan, X-K, Yang, C-W, Ren, P, Gong, L-L, Zhao, L-J, Xu, W-G, Wang, P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25939819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140590
_version_ 1782398453123383296
author Li, X-X
Liu, N-B
Zhu, L
Yuan, X-K
Yang, C-W
Ren, P
Gong, L-L
Zhao, L-J
Xu, W-G
Wang, P
author_facet Li, X-X
Liu, N-B
Zhu, L
Yuan, X-K
Yang, C-W
Ren, P
Gong, L-L
Zhao, L-J
Xu, W-G
Wang, P
author_sort Li, X-X
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the differences between contrast-enhanced (CE) fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and CECT in target volume delineation and radiotherapy (RT) dose distribution, and to evaluate the sparing of organs at risk (OARs) in the treatment plan of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: 21 consecutive patients with LAPC with histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma underwent both non-CECT and (18)F-FDG scans; 11 of whom also underwent CECT scans. Intensity-modulated RT plans (prescribed dose, 54 Gy) were constructed to cover the corresponding gross tumour volume (GTV). The differences among GTV(CT), GTV(PET), GTV(PET-CT) and OARs in these different image sets as well as the uniformity of target dose were analysed. RESULTS: The mean non-CE GTV(CT), GTV(PET) and GTV(PET-CT) were 76.9 ± 47.8, 47.0 ± 40.2 and 44.5 ± 34.7 cm(3) (mean ± standard deviation), respectively. The non-CE GTV(PET-CT) was significantly smaller than the non-CE GTV(CT) (p < 0.001). The CE GTV(PET-CT) was significantly smaller than the CE GTV(CT) (p = 0.033). For both the non-CE GTV(CT) and the CE GTV(CT), the intestine V(40) (the percentage of the intestine volume irradiated by 40 Gy), intestine V(50), intestine D(max) (the mean maximum dose), cord D(max), left kidney V(30), right kidney V(30), left kidney D(mean) (the mean dose), right kidney D(mean) and liver V(30) were 5.90%, 2.52%, 5500 cGy, 2194 cGy, 3.40%, 0.68%, 747 cGy, 550 cGy and 5.37%, respectively. There are significant differences between the non-CE CT and the non-CE PET-CT in intestine D(max) (p = 0.023) and right kidney D(mean) (p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Co-registration of (18)F-FDG PET with CECT may improve the accuracy of GTV delineation in LAPC and might reduce the adverse effect of irradiation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Individual adaptation of RT based on functional CE (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging is possible and highly promising in LAPC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4628516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46285162016-07-01 Consequences of additional use of contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT in target volume delineation and dose distribution for pancreatic cancer Li, X-X Liu, N-B Zhu, L Yuan, X-K Yang, C-W Ren, P Gong, L-L Zhao, L-J Xu, W-G Wang, P Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: To compare the differences between contrast-enhanced (CE) fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and CECT in target volume delineation and radiotherapy (RT) dose distribution, and to evaluate the sparing of organs at risk (OARs) in the treatment plan of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: 21 consecutive patients with LAPC with histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma underwent both non-CECT and (18)F-FDG scans; 11 of whom also underwent CECT scans. Intensity-modulated RT plans (prescribed dose, 54 Gy) were constructed to cover the corresponding gross tumour volume (GTV). The differences among GTV(CT), GTV(PET), GTV(PET-CT) and OARs in these different image sets as well as the uniformity of target dose were analysed. RESULTS: The mean non-CE GTV(CT), GTV(PET) and GTV(PET-CT) were 76.9 ± 47.8, 47.0 ± 40.2 and 44.5 ± 34.7 cm(3) (mean ± standard deviation), respectively. The non-CE GTV(PET-CT) was significantly smaller than the non-CE GTV(CT) (p < 0.001). The CE GTV(PET-CT) was significantly smaller than the CE GTV(CT) (p = 0.033). For both the non-CE GTV(CT) and the CE GTV(CT), the intestine V(40) (the percentage of the intestine volume irradiated by 40 Gy), intestine V(50), intestine D(max) (the mean maximum dose), cord D(max), left kidney V(30), right kidney V(30), left kidney D(mean) (the mean dose), right kidney D(mean) and liver V(30) were 5.90%, 2.52%, 5500 cGy, 2194 cGy, 3.40%, 0.68%, 747 cGy, 550 cGy and 5.37%, respectively. There are significant differences between the non-CE CT and the non-CE PET-CT in intestine D(max) (p = 0.023) and right kidney D(mean) (p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Co-registration of (18)F-FDG PET with CECT may improve the accuracy of GTV delineation in LAPC and might reduce the adverse effect of irradiation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Individual adaptation of RT based on functional CE (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging is possible and highly promising in LAPC. The British Institute of Radiology. 2015-07 2015-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4628516/ /pubmed/25939819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140590 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Li, X-X
Liu, N-B
Zhu, L
Yuan, X-K
Yang, C-W
Ren, P
Gong, L-L
Zhao, L-J
Xu, W-G
Wang, P
Consequences of additional use of contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT in target volume delineation and dose distribution for pancreatic cancer
title Consequences of additional use of contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT in target volume delineation and dose distribution for pancreatic cancer
title_full Consequences of additional use of contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT in target volume delineation and dose distribution for pancreatic cancer
title_fullStr Consequences of additional use of contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT in target volume delineation and dose distribution for pancreatic cancer
title_full_unstemmed Consequences of additional use of contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT in target volume delineation and dose distribution for pancreatic cancer
title_short Consequences of additional use of contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT in target volume delineation and dose distribution for pancreatic cancer
title_sort consequences of additional use of contrast-enhanced (18)f-fdg pet/ct in target volume delineation and dose distribution for pancreatic cancer
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25939819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140590
work_keys_str_mv AT lixx consequencesofadditionaluseofcontrastenhanced18ffdgpetctintargetvolumedelineationanddosedistributionforpancreaticcancer
AT liunb consequencesofadditionaluseofcontrastenhanced18ffdgpetctintargetvolumedelineationanddosedistributionforpancreaticcancer
AT zhul consequencesofadditionaluseofcontrastenhanced18ffdgpetctintargetvolumedelineationanddosedistributionforpancreaticcancer
AT yuanxk consequencesofadditionaluseofcontrastenhanced18ffdgpetctintargetvolumedelineationanddosedistributionforpancreaticcancer
AT yangcw consequencesofadditionaluseofcontrastenhanced18ffdgpetctintargetvolumedelineationanddosedistributionforpancreaticcancer
AT renp consequencesofadditionaluseofcontrastenhanced18ffdgpetctintargetvolumedelineationanddosedistributionforpancreaticcancer
AT gongll consequencesofadditionaluseofcontrastenhanced18ffdgpetctintargetvolumedelineationanddosedistributionforpancreaticcancer
AT zhaolj consequencesofadditionaluseofcontrastenhanced18ffdgpetctintargetvolumedelineationanddosedistributionforpancreaticcancer
AT xuwg consequencesofadditionaluseofcontrastenhanced18ffdgpetctintargetvolumedelineationanddosedistributionforpancreaticcancer
AT wangp consequencesofadditionaluseofcontrastenhanced18ffdgpetctintargetvolumedelineationanddosedistributionforpancreaticcancer