Cargando…

Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonmydriatic Fundus Photography for the Detection of Glaucoma in Diabetic Patients

Purpose. To determine the diagnostic accuracy for glaucoma of a set of criteria with nonmydriatic monoscopic fundus photography (NMFP) in diabetics. Methods. Diabetics recruited from a screening program for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic glaucoma patients recruited from our glaucoma unit were inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muñoz-Negrete, Francisco J., Contreras, Inés, Oblanca, Noelia, Pinazo-Durán, M. Dolores, Rebolleda, Gema
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/892174
_version_ 1782398476290621440
author Muñoz-Negrete, Francisco J.
Contreras, Inés
Oblanca, Noelia
Pinazo-Durán, M. Dolores
Rebolleda, Gema
author_facet Muñoz-Negrete, Francisco J.
Contreras, Inés
Oblanca, Noelia
Pinazo-Durán, M. Dolores
Rebolleda, Gema
author_sort Muñoz-Negrete, Francisco J.
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To determine the diagnostic accuracy for glaucoma of a set of criteria with nonmydriatic monoscopic fundus photography (NMFP) in diabetics. Methods. Diabetics recruited from a screening program for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic glaucoma patients recruited from our glaucoma unit were included. Any patient with evidence of diabetic retinopathy was excluded. Diabetic patients had to have no visual field defects to be included as controls. Glaucoma patients had to have a glaucomatous field defect in at least one eye to be included. One NMFP was taken per eye for all subjects. These photographs were evaluated by two masked glaucoma specialists for the presence of the following: bilateral cup to disc (C/D) ratio ≥0.6, notching or thinning of the neuroretinal rim, disc hemorrhages, and asymmetry in the C/D ratio between both eyes ≥0.2. This evaluation led to a dichotomous classification: if any of the above criteria was present, the patient was classified as glaucoma. If none were present, the patient was classified as normal. Results. 72 control subjects and 72 glaucoma patients were included. Evaluation of NMFP had a sensitivity of 79.17% and a specificity of 80.56% for specialist 1 and a sensitivity of 72.22% and a specificity of 88.88% for specialist 2 for the detection of glaucoma. The overall accuracy was 79.83% and 80.55%, respectively. Discussion. NMFP evaluation by a glaucoma specialist may be useful for the detection of glaucoma in diabetics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4628709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46287092015-11-09 Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonmydriatic Fundus Photography for the Detection of Glaucoma in Diabetic Patients Muñoz-Negrete, Francisco J. Contreras, Inés Oblanca, Noelia Pinazo-Durán, M. Dolores Rebolleda, Gema Biomed Res Int Research Article Purpose. To determine the diagnostic accuracy for glaucoma of a set of criteria with nonmydriatic monoscopic fundus photography (NMFP) in diabetics. Methods. Diabetics recruited from a screening program for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic glaucoma patients recruited from our glaucoma unit were included. Any patient with evidence of diabetic retinopathy was excluded. Diabetic patients had to have no visual field defects to be included as controls. Glaucoma patients had to have a glaucomatous field defect in at least one eye to be included. One NMFP was taken per eye for all subjects. These photographs were evaluated by two masked glaucoma specialists for the presence of the following: bilateral cup to disc (C/D) ratio ≥0.6, notching or thinning of the neuroretinal rim, disc hemorrhages, and asymmetry in the C/D ratio between both eyes ≥0.2. This evaluation led to a dichotomous classification: if any of the above criteria was present, the patient was classified as glaucoma. If none were present, the patient was classified as normal. Results. 72 control subjects and 72 glaucoma patients were included. Evaluation of NMFP had a sensitivity of 79.17% and a specificity of 80.56% for specialist 1 and a sensitivity of 72.22% and a specificity of 88.88% for specialist 2 for the detection of glaucoma. The overall accuracy was 79.83% and 80.55%, respectively. Discussion. NMFP evaluation by a glaucoma specialist may be useful for the detection of glaucoma in diabetics. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4628709/ /pubmed/26557709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/892174 Text en Copyright © 2015 Francisco J. Muñoz-Negrete et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Muñoz-Negrete, Francisco J.
Contreras, Inés
Oblanca, Noelia
Pinazo-Durán, M. Dolores
Rebolleda, Gema
Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonmydriatic Fundus Photography for the Detection of Glaucoma in Diabetic Patients
title Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonmydriatic Fundus Photography for the Detection of Glaucoma in Diabetic Patients
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonmydriatic Fundus Photography for the Detection of Glaucoma in Diabetic Patients
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonmydriatic Fundus Photography for the Detection of Glaucoma in Diabetic Patients
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonmydriatic Fundus Photography for the Detection of Glaucoma in Diabetic Patients
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonmydriatic Fundus Photography for the Detection of Glaucoma in Diabetic Patients
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of nonmydriatic fundus photography for the detection of glaucoma in diabetic patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/892174
work_keys_str_mv AT munoznegretefranciscoj diagnosticaccuracyofnonmydriaticfundusphotographyforthedetectionofglaucomaindiabeticpatients
AT contrerasines diagnosticaccuracyofnonmydriaticfundusphotographyforthedetectionofglaucomaindiabeticpatients
AT oblancanoelia diagnosticaccuracyofnonmydriaticfundusphotographyforthedetectionofglaucomaindiabeticpatients
AT pinazoduranmdolores diagnosticaccuracyofnonmydriaticfundusphotographyforthedetectionofglaucomaindiabeticpatients
AT rebolledagema diagnosticaccuracyofnonmydriaticfundusphotographyforthedetectionofglaucomaindiabeticpatients