Cargando…

Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus

Background. We investigated the validity of the two hyperacusis items of the TSCHQ (Tinnitus Sample Case History Questionnaire) from the TRI (Tinnitus Research Initiative) database by comparing them with the German hyperacusis questionnaire GÜF. Methods. We investigated the association of the GÜF wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schecklmann, Martin, Lehner, Astrid, Schlee, Winfried, Vielsmeier, Veronika, Landgrebe, Michael, Langguth, Berthold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/191479
_version_ 1782398488723587072
author Schecklmann, Martin
Lehner, Astrid
Schlee, Winfried
Vielsmeier, Veronika
Landgrebe, Michael
Langguth, Berthold
author_facet Schecklmann, Martin
Lehner, Astrid
Schlee, Winfried
Vielsmeier, Veronika
Landgrebe, Michael
Langguth, Berthold
author_sort Schecklmann, Martin
collection PubMed
description Background. We investigated the validity of the two hyperacusis items of the TSCHQ (Tinnitus Sample Case History Questionnaire) from the TRI (Tinnitus Research Initiative) database by comparing them with the German hyperacusis questionnaire GÜF. Methods. We investigated the association of the GÜF with the TSCHQ screening questions for both the sum score and the single items with correlation, contrast, principal component, and discriminant analysis in a sample of 161 patients with chronic tinnitus. Results. TSCHQ items and the GÜF total score were significantly associated with a special focus on fear and pain related hyperacusis. Factor analysis of the GÜF revealed the three factors “fear and pain related hyperacusis,” “hearing related problems,” and “problems in quality of life.” A discriminant analysis showed a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 71% of the TSCHQ items for the establishment of tinnitus patient subgroups with and without hyperacusis. Discussion. Both hyperacusis TSCHQ items can serve as screening questions with respect to self-reported hyperacusis in chronic tinnitus with a specific focus on fear and pain related hyperacusis. However, the multiple dimensions of hyperacusis should be considered for diagnosis and treatment in both scientific and clinical contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4628768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46287682015-11-09 Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus Schecklmann, Martin Lehner, Astrid Schlee, Winfried Vielsmeier, Veronika Landgrebe, Michael Langguth, Berthold Biomed Res Int Research Article Background. We investigated the validity of the two hyperacusis items of the TSCHQ (Tinnitus Sample Case History Questionnaire) from the TRI (Tinnitus Research Initiative) database by comparing them with the German hyperacusis questionnaire GÜF. Methods. We investigated the association of the GÜF with the TSCHQ screening questions for both the sum score and the single items with correlation, contrast, principal component, and discriminant analysis in a sample of 161 patients with chronic tinnitus. Results. TSCHQ items and the GÜF total score were significantly associated with a special focus on fear and pain related hyperacusis. Factor analysis of the GÜF revealed the three factors “fear and pain related hyperacusis,” “hearing related problems,” and “problems in quality of life.” A discriminant analysis showed a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 71% of the TSCHQ items for the establishment of tinnitus patient subgroups with and without hyperacusis. Discussion. Both hyperacusis TSCHQ items can serve as screening questions with respect to self-reported hyperacusis in chronic tinnitus with a specific focus on fear and pain related hyperacusis. However, the multiple dimensions of hyperacusis should be considered for diagnosis and treatment in both scientific and clinical contexts. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4628768/ /pubmed/26557654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/191479 Text en Copyright © 2015 Martin Schecklmann et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schecklmann, Martin
Lehner, Astrid
Schlee, Winfried
Vielsmeier, Veronika
Landgrebe, Michael
Langguth, Berthold
Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus
title Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus
title_full Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus
title_fullStr Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus
title_short Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus
title_sort validation of screening questions for hyperacusis in chronic tinnitus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/191479
work_keys_str_mv AT schecklmannmartin validationofscreeningquestionsforhyperacusisinchronictinnitus
AT lehnerastrid validationofscreeningquestionsforhyperacusisinchronictinnitus
AT schleewinfried validationofscreeningquestionsforhyperacusisinchronictinnitus
AT vielsmeierveronika validationofscreeningquestionsforhyperacusisinchronictinnitus
AT landgrebemichael validationofscreeningquestionsforhyperacusisinchronictinnitus
AT langguthberthold validationofscreeningquestionsforhyperacusisinchronictinnitus