Cargando…
Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus
Background. We investigated the validity of the two hyperacusis items of the TSCHQ (Tinnitus Sample Case History Questionnaire) from the TRI (Tinnitus Research Initiative) database by comparing them with the German hyperacusis questionnaire GÜF. Methods. We investigated the association of the GÜF wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/191479 |
_version_ | 1782398488723587072 |
---|---|
author | Schecklmann, Martin Lehner, Astrid Schlee, Winfried Vielsmeier, Veronika Landgrebe, Michael Langguth, Berthold |
author_facet | Schecklmann, Martin Lehner, Astrid Schlee, Winfried Vielsmeier, Veronika Landgrebe, Michael Langguth, Berthold |
author_sort | Schecklmann, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. We investigated the validity of the two hyperacusis items of the TSCHQ (Tinnitus Sample Case History Questionnaire) from the TRI (Tinnitus Research Initiative) database by comparing them with the German hyperacusis questionnaire GÜF. Methods. We investigated the association of the GÜF with the TSCHQ screening questions for both the sum score and the single items with correlation, contrast, principal component, and discriminant analysis in a sample of 161 patients with chronic tinnitus. Results. TSCHQ items and the GÜF total score were significantly associated with a special focus on fear and pain related hyperacusis. Factor analysis of the GÜF revealed the three factors “fear and pain related hyperacusis,” “hearing related problems,” and “problems in quality of life.” A discriminant analysis showed a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 71% of the TSCHQ items for the establishment of tinnitus patient subgroups with and without hyperacusis. Discussion. Both hyperacusis TSCHQ items can serve as screening questions with respect to self-reported hyperacusis in chronic tinnitus with a specific focus on fear and pain related hyperacusis. However, the multiple dimensions of hyperacusis should be considered for diagnosis and treatment in both scientific and clinical contexts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4628768 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46287682015-11-09 Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus Schecklmann, Martin Lehner, Astrid Schlee, Winfried Vielsmeier, Veronika Landgrebe, Michael Langguth, Berthold Biomed Res Int Research Article Background. We investigated the validity of the two hyperacusis items of the TSCHQ (Tinnitus Sample Case History Questionnaire) from the TRI (Tinnitus Research Initiative) database by comparing them with the German hyperacusis questionnaire GÜF. Methods. We investigated the association of the GÜF with the TSCHQ screening questions for both the sum score and the single items with correlation, contrast, principal component, and discriminant analysis in a sample of 161 patients with chronic tinnitus. Results. TSCHQ items and the GÜF total score were significantly associated with a special focus on fear and pain related hyperacusis. Factor analysis of the GÜF revealed the three factors “fear and pain related hyperacusis,” “hearing related problems,” and “problems in quality of life.” A discriminant analysis showed a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 71% of the TSCHQ items for the establishment of tinnitus patient subgroups with and without hyperacusis. Discussion. Both hyperacusis TSCHQ items can serve as screening questions with respect to self-reported hyperacusis in chronic tinnitus with a specific focus on fear and pain related hyperacusis. However, the multiple dimensions of hyperacusis should be considered for diagnosis and treatment in both scientific and clinical contexts. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4628768/ /pubmed/26557654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/191479 Text en Copyright © 2015 Martin Schecklmann et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schecklmann, Martin Lehner, Astrid Schlee, Winfried Vielsmeier, Veronika Landgrebe, Michael Langguth, Berthold Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus |
title | Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus |
title_full | Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus |
title_fullStr | Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus |
title_short | Validation of Screening Questions for Hyperacusis in Chronic Tinnitus |
title_sort | validation of screening questions for hyperacusis in chronic tinnitus |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/191479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schecklmannmartin validationofscreeningquestionsforhyperacusisinchronictinnitus AT lehnerastrid validationofscreeningquestionsforhyperacusisinchronictinnitus AT schleewinfried validationofscreeningquestionsforhyperacusisinchronictinnitus AT vielsmeierveronika validationofscreeningquestionsforhyperacusisinchronictinnitus AT landgrebemichael validationofscreeningquestionsforhyperacusisinchronictinnitus AT langguthberthold validationofscreeningquestionsforhyperacusisinchronictinnitus |