Cargando…

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer

Statistical analyses presented in general medical journals are becoming increasingly sophisticated. BMC Medicine relies on subject reviewers to indicate when a statistical review is required. We consider this policy and provide guidance on when to recommend a manuscript for statistical evaluation. I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greenwood, Darren C., Freeman, Jennifer V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26521808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0510-5
_version_ 1782398561281900544
author Greenwood, Darren C.
Freeman, Jennifer V.
author_facet Greenwood, Darren C.
Freeman, Jennifer V.
author_sort Greenwood, Darren C.
collection PubMed
description Statistical analyses presented in general medical journals are becoming increasingly sophisticated. BMC Medicine relies on subject reviewers to indicate when a statistical review is required. We consider this policy and provide guidance on when to recommend a manuscript for statistical evaluation. Indicators for statistical review include insufficient detail in methods or results, some common statistical issues and interpretation not based on the presented evidence. Reviewers are required to ensure that the manuscript is methodologically sound and clearly written. Within that context, they are expected to provide constructive feedback and opinion on the statistical design, analysis, presentation and interpretation. If reviewers lack the appropriate background to positively confirm the appropriateness of any of the manuscript’s statistical aspects, they are encouraged to recommend it for expert statistical review.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4629287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46292872015-11-03 How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer Greenwood, Darren C. Freeman, Jennifer V. BMC Med Tutorial Statistical analyses presented in general medical journals are becoming increasingly sophisticated. BMC Medicine relies on subject reviewers to indicate when a statistical review is required. We consider this policy and provide guidance on when to recommend a manuscript for statistical evaluation. Indicators for statistical review include insufficient detail in methods or results, some common statistical issues and interpretation not based on the presented evidence. Reviewers are required to ensure that the manuscript is methodologically sound and clearly written. Within that context, they are expected to provide constructive feedback and opinion on the statistical design, analysis, presentation and interpretation. If reviewers lack the appropriate background to positively confirm the appropriateness of any of the manuscript’s statistical aspects, they are encouraged to recommend it for expert statistical review. BioMed Central 2015-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4629287/ /pubmed/26521808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0510-5 Text en © Greenwood and Freeman. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Tutorial
Greenwood, Darren C.
Freeman, Jennifer V.
How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer
title How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer
title_full How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer
title_fullStr How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer
title_full_unstemmed How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer
title_short How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer
title_sort how to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer
topic Tutorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26521808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0510-5
work_keys_str_mv AT greenwooddarrenc howtospotastatisticalproblemadviceforanonstatisticalreviewer
AT freemanjenniferv howtospotastatisticalproblemadviceforanonstatisticalreviewer