Cargando…
An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values
BACKGROUND: Ideally, the allocation of research funding for each specific type of cancer should be proportional to its societal burden. This burden can be estimated with the metric ‘years of life lost’ (YLL), which combines overall mortality and age at death. METHODS: Using United Kingdom data from...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26526609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0050-7 |
_version_ | 1782398561511538688 |
---|---|
author | Carter, Ashley J. R. Delarosa, Beverly Hur, Hannah |
author_facet | Carter, Ashley J. R. Delarosa, Beverly Hur, Hannah |
author_sort | Carter, Ashley J. R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ideally, the allocation of research funding for each specific type of cancer should be proportional to its societal burden. This burden can be estimated with the metric ‘years of life lost’ (YLL), which combines overall mortality and age at death. METHODS: Using United Kingdom data from 2010, we compared research funding from the National Cancer Research Institute to this YLL burden metric for 26 types of cancers in order to identify the discrepancies between cancer research funding allocation and societal burden. We also compared these values to United States data from 2010 and United Kingdom data published in 2005. RESULTS: Our study revealed a number of discrepancies between cancer research funding and burden. Some cancers are funded at levels far higher than their relative burden suggests (testicular, leukaemia, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, breast, cervical, ovarian, prostate) while other cancers appear underfunded (gallbladder, lung, nasopharyngeal, intestine, stomach, pancreatic, thyroid, oesophageal, liver, kidney, bladder, and brain/central nervous system). United Kingdom funding patterns over the past decade have generally moved to increase funding to previously underfunded cancers with one notable exception showing a converse trend (breast cancer). The broad relationship between United Kingdom and United States funding patterns is similar with a few exceptions (e.g. leukaemia, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, prostate, testicular cancer). CONCLUSIONS: There are discrepancies between cancer research funding allocation and societal burden in the United Kingdom. These discrepancies are broadly similar in both the United Kingdom and the United States and, while they appear to be improving, this is not consistent across all types of cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0050-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4629288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46292882015-11-03 An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values Carter, Ashley J. R. Delarosa, Beverly Hur, Hannah Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Ideally, the allocation of research funding for each specific type of cancer should be proportional to its societal burden. This burden can be estimated with the metric ‘years of life lost’ (YLL), which combines overall mortality and age at death. METHODS: Using United Kingdom data from 2010, we compared research funding from the National Cancer Research Institute to this YLL burden metric for 26 types of cancers in order to identify the discrepancies between cancer research funding allocation and societal burden. We also compared these values to United States data from 2010 and United Kingdom data published in 2005. RESULTS: Our study revealed a number of discrepancies between cancer research funding and burden. Some cancers are funded at levels far higher than their relative burden suggests (testicular, leukaemia, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, breast, cervical, ovarian, prostate) while other cancers appear underfunded (gallbladder, lung, nasopharyngeal, intestine, stomach, pancreatic, thyroid, oesophageal, liver, kidney, bladder, and brain/central nervous system). United Kingdom funding patterns over the past decade have generally moved to increase funding to previously underfunded cancers with one notable exception showing a converse trend (breast cancer). The broad relationship between United Kingdom and United States funding patterns is similar with a few exceptions (e.g. leukaemia, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, prostate, testicular cancer). CONCLUSIONS: There are discrepancies between cancer research funding allocation and societal burden in the United Kingdom. These discrepancies are broadly similar in both the United Kingdom and the United States and, while they appear to be improving, this is not consistent across all types of cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0050-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4629288/ /pubmed/26526609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0050-7 Text en © Carter et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Carter, Ashley J. R. Delarosa, Beverly Hur, Hannah An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values |
title | An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values |
title_full | An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values |
title_fullStr | An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values |
title_full_unstemmed | An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values |
title_short | An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values |
title_sort | analysis of discrepancies between united kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and united states values |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26526609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0050-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carterashleyjr ananalysisofdiscrepanciesbetweenunitedkingdomcancerresearchfundingandsocietalburdenandacomparisontopreviousandunitedstatesvalues AT delarosabeverly ananalysisofdiscrepanciesbetweenunitedkingdomcancerresearchfundingandsocietalburdenandacomparisontopreviousandunitedstatesvalues AT hurhannah ananalysisofdiscrepanciesbetweenunitedkingdomcancerresearchfundingandsocietalburdenandacomparisontopreviousandunitedstatesvalues AT carterashleyjr analysisofdiscrepanciesbetweenunitedkingdomcancerresearchfundingandsocietalburdenandacomparisontopreviousandunitedstatesvalues AT delarosabeverly analysisofdiscrepanciesbetweenunitedkingdomcancerresearchfundingandsocietalburdenandacomparisontopreviousandunitedstatesvalues AT hurhannah analysisofdiscrepanciesbetweenunitedkingdomcancerresearchfundingandsocietalburdenandacomparisontopreviousandunitedstatesvalues |