Cargando…

An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values

BACKGROUND: Ideally, the allocation of research funding for each specific type of cancer should be proportional to its societal burden. This burden can be estimated with the metric ‘years of life lost’ (YLL), which combines overall mortality and age at death. METHODS: Using United Kingdom data from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carter, Ashley J. R., Delarosa, Beverly, Hur, Hannah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26526609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0050-7
_version_ 1782398561511538688
author Carter, Ashley J. R.
Delarosa, Beverly
Hur, Hannah
author_facet Carter, Ashley J. R.
Delarosa, Beverly
Hur, Hannah
author_sort Carter, Ashley J. R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ideally, the allocation of research funding for each specific type of cancer should be proportional to its societal burden. This burden can be estimated with the metric ‘years of life lost’ (YLL), which combines overall mortality and age at death. METHODS: Using United Kingdom data from 2010, we compared research funding from the National Cancer Research Institute to this YLL burden metric for 26 types of cancers in order to identify the discrepancies between cancer research funding allocation and societal burden. We also compared these values to United States data from 2010 and United Kingdom data published in 2005. RESULTS: Our study revealed a number of discrepancies between cancer research funding and burden. Some cancers are funded at levels far higher than their relative burden suggests (testicular, leukaemia, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, breast, cervical, ovarian, prostate) while other cancers appear underfunded (gallbladder, lung, nasopharyngeal, intestine, stomach, pancreatic, thyroid, oesophageal, liver, kidney, bladder, and brain/central nervous system). United Kingdom funding patterns over the past decade have generally moved to increase funding to previously underfunded cancers with one notable exception showing a converse trend (breast cancer). The broad relationship between United Kingdom and United States funding patterns is similar with a few exceptions (e.g. leukaemia, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, prostate, testicular cancer). CONCLUSIONS: There are discrepancies between cancer research funding allocation and societal burden in the United Kingdom. These discrepancies are broadly similar in both the United Kingdom and the United States and, while they appear to be improving, this is not consistent across all types of cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0050-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4629288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46292882015-11-03 An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values Carter, Ashley J. R. Delarosa, Beverly Hur, Hannah Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Ideally, the allocation of research funding for each specific type of cancer should be proportional to its societal burden. This burden can be estimated with the metric ‘years of life lost’ (YLL), which combines overall mortality and age at death. METHODS: Using United Kingdom data from 2010, we compared research funding from the National Cancer Research Institute to this YLL burden metric for 26 types of cancers in order to identify the discrepancies between cancer research funding allocation and societal burden. We also compared these values to United States data from 2010 and United Kingdom data published in 2005. RESULTS: Our study revealed a number of discrepancies between cancer research funding and burden. Some cancers are funded at levels far higher than their relative burden suggests (testicular, leukaemia, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, breast, cervical, ovarian, prostate) while other cancers appear underfunded (gallbladder, lung, nasopharyngeal, intestine, stomach, pancreatic, thyroid, oesophageal, liver, kidney, bladder, and brain/central nervous system). United Kingdom funding patterns over the past decade have generally moved to increase funding to previously underfunded cancers with one notable exception showing a converse trend (breast cancer). The broad relationship between United Kingdom and United States funding patterns is similar with a few exceptions (e.g. leukaemia, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, prostate, testicular cancer). CONCLUSIONS: There are discrepancies between cancer research funding allocation and societal burden in the United Kingdom. These discrepancies are broadly similar in both the United Kingdom and the United States and, while they appear to be improving, this is not consistent across all types of cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0050-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4629288/ /pubmed/26526609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0050-7 Text en © Carter et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Carter, Ashley J. R.
Delarosa, Beverly
Hur, Hannah
An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values
title An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values
title_full An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values
title_fullStr An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values
title_short An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values
title_sort analysis of discrepancies between united kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and united states values
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26526609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0050-7
work_keys_str_mv AT carterashleyjr ananalysisofdiscrepanciesbetweenunitedkingdomcancerresearchfundingandsocietalburdenandacomparisontopreviousandunitedstatesvalues
AT delarosabeverly ananalysisofdiscrepanciesbetweenunitedkingdomcancerresearchfundingandsocietalburdenandacomparisontopreviousandunitedstatesvalues
AT hurhannah ananalysisofdiscrepanciesbetweenunitedkingdomcancerresearchfundingandsocietalburdenandacomparisontopreviousandunitedstatesvalues
AT carterashleyjr analysisofdiscrepanciesbetweenunitedkingdomcancerresearchfundingandsocietalburdenandacomparisontopreviousandunitedstatesvalues
AT delarosabeverly analysisofdiscrepanciesbetweenunitedkingdomcancerresearchfundingandsocietalburdenandacomparisontopreviousandunitedstatesvalues
AT hurhannah analysisofdiscrepanciesbetweenunitedkingdomcancerresearchfundingandsocietalburdenandacomparisontopreviousandunitedstatesvalues