Cargando…
Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis
Systematic reviews are popular. A recent estimate indicates that 11 new systematic reviews are published daily. Nevertheless, evidence indicates that the quality of reporting of systematic reviews is not optimal. One likely reason is that the authors’ reports have received inadequate peer review. Th...
Autor principal: | Moher, David |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26521692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0509-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
A guide to performing a peer review of randomised controlled trials
por: Del Mar, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large‐evidence systematic reviews and meta‐analyses
por: Polanin, Joshua R., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology
por: Debray, Thomas P. A., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (with examples from the MUDS study)
por: Mayo‐Wilson, Evan, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Demystifying the Search Button: A Comprehensive PubMed Search Strategy for Performing an Exhaustive Literature Review
por: McKeever, Liam, et al.
Publicado: (2015)