Cargando…

The effects of a 2-h trial of high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula versus Venturi mask in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a multicenter randomized trial

INTRODUCTION: In immunocompromised patients, acute respiratory failure (ARF) is associated with high mortality, particularly when invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is required. In patients with severe hypoxemia, high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy has been used as an alternative to delivery of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lemiale, Virginie, Mokart, Djamel, Mayaux, Julien, Lambert, Jérôme, Rabbat, Antoine, Demoule, Alexandre, Azoulay, Elie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26521922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1097-0
_version_ 1782398570373054464
author Lemiale, Virginie
Mokart, Djamel
Mayaux, Julien
Lambert, Jérôme
Rabbat, Antoine
Demoule, Alexandre
Azoulay, Elie
author_facet Lemiale, Virginie
Mokart, Djamel
Mayaux, Julien
Lambert, Jérôme
Rabbat, Antoine
Demoule, Alexandre
Azoulay, Elie
author_sort Lemiale, Virginie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In immunocompromised patients, acute respiratory failure (ARF) is associated with high mortality, particularly when invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is required. In patients with severe hypoxemia, high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy has been used as an alternative to delivery of oxygen via a Venturi mask. Our objective in the present study was to compare HFNO and Venturi mask oxygen in immunocompromised patients with ARF. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, parallel-group randomized controlled trial in four intensive care units. Inclusion criteria were hypoxemic ARF and immunosuppression, defined as at least one of the following: solid or hematological malignancy, steroid or other immunosuppressant drug therapy, and HIV infection. Exclusion criteria were hypercapnia, previous IMV, and immediate need for IMV or noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Patients were randomized to 2 h of HFNO or Venturi mask oxygen. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was a need for IMV or NIV during the 2-h oxygen therapy period. Secondary endpoints were comfort, dyspnea, and thirst, as assessed hourly using a 0–10 visual analogue scale. We randomized 100 consecutive patients, including 84 with malignancies, to HFNO (n = 52) or Venturi mask oxygen (n = 48). During the 2-h study treatment period, 12 patients required IMV or NIV, and we found no significant difference between the two groups (15 % with HFNO and 8 % with the Venturi mask, P = 0.36). None of the secondary endpoints differed significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic ARF, a 2-h trial with HFNO improved neither mechanical ventilatory assistance nor patient comfort compared with oxygen delivered via a Venturi mask. However, the study was underpowered because of the low event rate and the one-sided hypothesis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02424773. Registered 20 April 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4629403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46294032015-11-03 The effects of a 2-h trial of high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula versus Venturi mask in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a multicenter randomized trial Lemiale, Virginie Mokart, Djamel Mayaux, Julien Lambert, Jérôme Rabbat, Antoine Demoule, Alexandre Azoulay, Elie Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: In immunocompromised patients, acute respiratory failure (ARF) is associated with high mortality, particularly when invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is required. In patients with severe hypoxemia, high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy has been used as an alternative to delivery of oxygen via a Venturi mask. Our objective in the present study was to compare HFNO and Venturi mask oxygen in immunocompromised patients with ARF. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, parallel-group randomized controlled trial in four intensive care units. Inclusion criteria were hypoxemic ARF and immunosuppression, defined as at least one of the following: solid or hematological malignancy, steroid or other immunosuppressant drug therapy, and HIV infection. Exclusion criteria were hypercapnia, previous IMV, and immediate need for IMV or noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Patients were randomized to 2 h of HFNO or Venturi mask oxygen. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was a need for IMV or NIV during the 2-h oxygen therapy period. Secondary endpoints were comfort, dyspnea, and thirst, as assessed hourly using a 0–10 visual analogue scale. We randomized 100 consecutive patients, including 84 with malignancies, to HFNO (n = 52) or Venturi mask oxygen (n = 48). During the 2-h study treatment period, 12 patients required IMV or NIV, and we found no significant difference between the two groups (15 % with HFNO and 8 % with the Venturi mask, P = 0.36). None of the secondary endpoints differed significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic ARF, a 2-h trial with HFNO improved neither mechanical ventilatory assistance nor patient comfort compared with oxygen delivered via a Venturi mask. However, the study was underpowered because of the low event rate and the one-sided hypothesis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02424773. Registered 20 April 2015. BioMed Central 2015-11-02 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4629403/ /pubmed/26521922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1097-0 Text en © Lemiale et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lemiale, Virginie
Mokart, Djamel
Mayaux, Julien
Lambert, Jérôme
Rabbat, Antoine
Demoule, Alexandre
Azoulay, Elie
The effects of a 2-h trial of high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula versus Venturi mask in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a multicenter randomized trial
title The effects of a 2-h trial of high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula versus Venturi mask in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a multicenter randomized trial
title_full The effects of a 2-h trial of high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula versus Venturi mask in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a multicenter randomized trial
title_fullStr The effects of a 2-h trial of high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula versus Venturi mask in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a multicenter randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed The effects of a 2-h trial of high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula versus Venturi mask in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a multicenter randomized trial
title_short The effects of a 2-h trial of high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula versus Venturi mask in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a multicenter randomized trial
title_sort effects of a 2-h trial of high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula versus venturi mask in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a multicenter randomized trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26521922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1097-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lemialevirginie theeffectsofa2htrialofhighflowoxygenbynasalcannulaversusventurimaskinimmunocompromisedpatientswithhypoxemicacuterespiratoryfailureamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT mokartdjamel theeffectsofa2htrialofhighflowoxygenbynasalcannulaversusventurimaskinimmunocompromisedpatientswithhypoxemicacuterespiratoryfailureamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT mayauxjulien theeffectsofa2htrialofhighflowoxygenbynasalcannulaversusventurimaskinimmunocompromisedpatientswithhypoxemicacuterespiratoryfailureamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT lambertjerome theeffectsofa2htrialofhighflowoxygenbynasalcannulaversusventurimaskinimmunocompromisedpatientswithhypoxemicacuterespiratoryfailureamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT rabbatantoine theeffectsofa2htrialofhighflowoxygenbynasalcannulaversusventurimaskinimmunocompromisedpatientswithhypoxemicacuterespiratoryfailureamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT demoulealexandre theeffectsofa2htrialofhighflowoxygenbynasalcannulaversusventurimaskinimmunocompromisedpatientswithhypoxemicacuterespiratoryfailureamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT azoulayelie theeffectsofa2htrialofhighflowoxygenbynasalcannulaversusventurimaskinimmunocompromisedpatientswithhypoxemicacuterespiratoryfailureamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT lemialevirginie effectsofa2htrialofhighflowoxygenbynasalcannulaversusventurimaskinimmunocompromisedpatientswithhypoxemicacuterespiratoryfailureamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT mokartdjamel effectsofa2htrialofhighflowoxygenbynasalcannulaversusventurimaskinimmunocompromisedpatientswithhypoxemicacuterespiratoryfailureamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT mayauxjulien effectsofa2htrialofhighflowoxygenbynasalcannulaversusventurimaskinimmunocompromisedpatientswithhypoxemicacuterespiratoryfailureamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT lambertjerome effectsofa2htrialofhighflowoxygenbynasalcannulaversusventurimaskinimmunocompromisedpatientswithhypoxemicacuterespiratoryfailureamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT rabbatantoine effectsofa2htrialofhighflowoxygenbynasalcannulaversusventurimaskinimmunocompromisedpatientswithhypoxemicacuterespiratoryfailureamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT demoulealexandre effectsofa2htrialofhighflowoxygenbynasalcannulaversusventurimaskinimmunocompromisedpatientswithhypoxemicacuterespiratoryfailureamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT azoulayelie effectsofa2htrialofhighflowoxygenbynasalcannulaversusventurimaskinimmunocompromisedpatientswithhypoxemicacuterespiratoryfailureamulticenterrandomizedtrial