Cargando…

Erroneous and Veridical Recall Are Not Two Sides of the Same Coin: Evidence From Semantic Distraction in Free Recall

Two experiments examined the extent to which erroneous recall blocks veridical recall using, as a vehicle for study, the disruptive impact of distractors that are semantically similar to a list of words presented for free recall. Instructing participants to avoid erroneous recall of to-be-ignored sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marsh, John E., Hughes, Robert W., Sörqvist, Patrik, Beaman, C. Philip, Jones, Dylan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Psychological Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25938326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000121
_version_ 1782398584418729984
author Marsh, John E.
Hughes, Robert W.
Sörqvist, Patrik
Beaman, C. Philip
Jones, Dylan M.
author_facet Marsh, John E.
Hughes, Robert W.
Sörqvist, Patrik
Beaman, C. Philip
Jones, Dylan M.
author_sort Marsh, John E.
collection PubMed
description Two experiments examined the extent to which erroneous recall blocks veridical recall using, as a vehicle for study, the disruptive impact of distractors that are semantically similar to a list of words presented for free recall. Instructing participants to avoid erroneous recall of to-be-ignored spoken distractors attenuated their recall but this did not influence the disruptive effect of those distractors on veridical recall (Experiment 1). Using an externalized output-editing procedure—whereby participants recalled all items that came to mind and identified those that were erroneous—the usual between-sequences semantic similarity effect on erroneous and veridical recall was replicated but the relationship between the rate of erroneous and veridical recall was weak (Experiment 2). The results suggest that forgetting is not due to veridical recall being blocked by similar events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4629522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher American Psychological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46295222015-11-04 Erroneous and Veridical Recall Are Not Two Sides of the Same Coin: Evidence From Semantic Distraction in Free Recall Marsh, John E. Hughes, Robert W. Sörqvist, Patrik Beaman, C. Philip Jones, Dylan M. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn Research Articles Two experiments examined the extent to which erroneous recall blocks veridical recall using, as a vehicle for study, the disruptive impact of distractors that are semantically similar to a list of words presented for free recall. Instructing participants to avoid erroneous recall of to-be-ignored spoken distractors attenuated their recall but this did not influence the disruptive effect of those distractors on veridical recall (Experiment 1). Using an externalized output-editing procedure—whereby participants recalled all items that came to mind and identified those that were erroneous—the usual between-sequences semantic similarity effect on erroneous and veridical recall was replicated but the relationship between the rate of erroneous and veridical recall was weak (Experiment 2). The results suggest that forgetting is not due to veridical recall being blocked by similar events. American Psychological Association 2015-05-04 2015-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4629522/ /pubmed/25938326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000121 Text en © 2015 American Psychological Association
spellingShingle Research Articles
Marsh, John E.
Hughes, Robert W.
Sörqvist, Patrik
Beaman, C. Philip
Jones, Dylan M.
Erroneous and Veridical Recall Are Not Two Sides of the Same Coin: Evidence From Semantic Distraction in Free Recall
title Erroneous and Veridical Recall Are Not Two Sides of the Same Coin: Evidence From Semantic Distraction in Free Recall
title_full Erroneous and Veridical Recall Are Not Two Sides of the Same Coin: Evidence From Semantic Distraction in Free Recall
title_fullStr Erroneous and Veridical Recall Are Not Two Sides of the Same Coin: Evidence From Semantic Distraction in Free Recall
title_full_unstemmed Erroneous and Veridical Recall Are Not Two Sides of the Same Coin: Evidence From Semantic Distraction in Free Recall
title_short Erroneous and Veridical Recall Are Not Two Sides of the Same Coin: Evidence From Semantic Distraction in Free Recall
title_sort erroneous and veridical recall are not two sides of the same coin: evidence from semantic distraction in free recall
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25938326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000121
work_keys_str_mv AT marshjohne erroneousandveridicalrecallarenottwosidesofthesamecoinevidencefromsemanticdistractioninfreerecall
AT hughesrobertw erroneousandveridicalrecallarenottwosidesofthesamecoinevidencefromsemanticdistractioninfreerecall
AT sorqvistpatrik erroneousandveridicalrecallarenottwosidesofthesamecoinevidencefromsemanticdistractioninfreerecall
AT beamancphilip erroneousandveridicalrecallarenottwosidesofthesamecoinevidencefromsemanticdistractioninfreerecall
AT jonesdylanm erroneousandveridicalrecallarenottwosidesofthesamecoinevidencefromsemanticdistractioninfreerecall