Cargando…

Electrophysiological characteristics of feeding-related neurons after taste avoidance Pavlovian conditioning in Lymnaea stagnalis

Taste avoidance conditioning (TAC) was carried out on the pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis. The conditional stimulus (CS) was sucrose which elicits feeding behavior; while the unconditional stimulus (US) was a tactile stimulus to the head which causes feeding to be suppressed. The neuronal circuit that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sunada, Hiroshi, Takigami, Satoshi, Lukowiak, Ken, Sakakibara, Manabu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Biophysical Society of Japan (BSJ) 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493506
http://dx.doi.org/10.2142/biophysics.10.121
_version_ 1782398608595746816
author Sunada, Hiroshi
Takigami, Satoshi
Lukowiak, Ken
Sakakibara, Manabu
author_facet Sunada, Hiroshi
Takigami, Satoshi
Lukowiak, Ken
Sakakibara, Manabu
author_sort Sunada, Hiroshi
collection PubMed
description Taste avoidance conditioning (TAC) was carried out on the pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis. The conditional stimulus (CS) was sucrose which elicits feeding behavior; while the unconditional stimulus (US) was a tactile stimulus to the head which causes feeding to be suppressed. The neuronal circuit that drives feeding behavior in Lymnaea is well worked out. We therefore compared the physiological characteristics on 3 classes of neurons involved with feeding behavior especially in response to the CS in conditioned vs. control snails. The cerebral giant cell (CGC) modulates feeding behavior, N1 medial neuron (N1M) is one of the central pattern generator neurons that organizes feeding behavior, while B3 is a motor neuron active during the rasp phase of feeding. We found the resting membrane potential in CGC was hyperpolarized significantly in conditioned snails but impulse activity remained the same between conditioned vs. control snails. There was, however, a significant increase in spontaneous activity and a significant depolarization of N1M’s resting membrane potential in conditioned snails. These changes in N1M activity as a result of training are thought to be due to withdrawal interneuron RPeD11 altering the activity of the CGCs. Finally, in B3 there was: 1) a significant decrease in the amplitude and the frequency of the post-synaptic potentials; 2) a significant hyperpolarization of resting membrane potential in conditioned snails; and 3) a disappearance of bursting activity typically initiated by the CS. These neuronal modifications are consistent with the behavioral phenotype elicited by the CS following conditioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4629664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Biophysical Society of Japan (BSJ)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46296642016-08-04 Electrophysiological characteristics of feeding-related neurons after taste avoidance Pavlovian conditioning in Lymnaea stagnalis Sunada, Hiroshi Takigami, Satoshi Lukowiak, Ken Sakakibara, Manabu Biophysics (Nagoya-shi) Review Article Taste avoidance conditioning (TAC) was carried out on the pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis. The conditional stimulus (CS) was sucrose which elicits feeding behavior; while the unconditional stimulus (US) was a tactile stimulus to the head which causes feeding to be suppressed. The neuronal circuit that drives feeding behavior in Lymnaea is well worked out. We therefore compared the physiological characteristics on 3 classes of neurons involved with feeding behavior especially in response to the CS in conditioned vs. control snails. The cerebral giant cell (CGC) modulates feeding behavior, N1 medial neuron (N1M) is one of the central pattern generator neurons that organizes feeding behavior, while B3 is a motor neuron active during the rasp phase of feeding. We found the resting membrane potential in CGC was hyperpolarized significantly in conditioned snails but impulse activity remained the same between conditioned vs. control snails. There was, however, a significant increase in spontaneous activity and a significant depolarization of N1M’s resting membrane potential in conditioned snails. These changes in N1M activity as a result of training are thought to be due to withdrawal interneuron RPeD11 altering the activity of the CGCs. Finally, in B3 there was: 1) a significant decrease in the amplitude and the frequency of the post-synaptic potentials; 2) a significant hyperpolarization of resting membrane potential in conditioned snails; and 3) a disappearance of bursting activity typically initiated by the CS. These neuronal modifications are consistent with the behavioral phenotype elicited by the CS following conditioning. The Biophysical Society of Japan (BSJ) 2014-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4629664/ /pubmed/27493506 http://dx.doi.org/10.2142/biophysics.10.121 Text en ©2014 THE BIOPHYSICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
spellingShingle Review Article
Sunada, Hiroshi
Takigami, Satoshi
Lukowiak, Ken
Sakakibara, Manabu
Electrophysiological characteristics of feeding-related neurons after taste avoidance Pavlovian conditioning in Lymnaea stagnalis
title Electrophysiological characteristics of feeding-related neurons after taste avoidance Pavlovian conditioning in Lymnaea stagnalis
title_full Electrophysiological characteristics of feeding-related neurons after taste avoidance Pavlovian conditioning in Lymnaea stagnalis
title_fullStr Electrophysiological characteristics of feeding-related neurons after taste avoidance Pavlovian conditioning in Lymnaea stagnalis
title_full_unstemmed Electrophysiological characteristics of feeding-related neurons after taste avoidance Pavlovian conditioning in Lymnaea stagnalis
title_short Electrophysiological characteristics of feeding-related neurons after taste avoidance Pavlovian conditioning in Lymnaea stagnalis
title_sort electrophysiological characteristics of feeding-related neurons after taste avoidance pavlovian conditioning in lymnaea stagnalis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493506
http://dx.doi.org/10.2142/biophysics.10.121
work_keys_str_mv AT sunadahiroshi electrophysiologicalcharacteristicsoffeedingrelatedneuronsaftertasteavoidancepavlovianconditioninginlymnaeastagnalis
AT takigamisatoshi electrophysiologicalcharacteristicsoffeedingrelatedneuronsaftertasteavoidancepavlovianconditioninginlymnaeastagnalis
AT lukowiakken electrophysiologicalcharacteristicsoffeedingrelatedneuronsaftertasteavoidancepavlovianconditioninginlymnaeastagnalis
AT sakakibaramanabu electrophysiologicalcharacteristicsoffeedingrelatedneuronsaftertasteavoidancepavlovianconditioninginlymnaeastagnalis