Cargando…

An Assessment of Participatory Integrated Vector Management for Malaria Control in Kenya

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends integrated vector management (IVM) as a strategy to improve and sustain malaria vector control. However, this approach has not been widely adopted. OBJECTIVES: We comprehensively assessed experiences and findings on IVM in Kenya with a view...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mutero, Clifford Maina, Mbogo, Charles, Mwangangi, Joseph, Imbahale, Susan, Kibe, Lydia, Orindi, Benedict, Girma, Melaku, Njui, Annah, Lwande, Wilber, Affognon, Hippolyte, Gichuki, Charity, Mukabana, Wolfgang Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25859686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408748
_version_ 1782398621246816256
author Mutero, Clifford Maina
Mbogo, Charles
Mwangangi, Joseph
Imbahale, Susan
Kibe, Lydia
Orindi, Benedict
Girma, Melaku
Njui, Annah
Lwande, Wilber
Affognon, Hippolyte
Gichuki, Charity
Mukabana, Wolfgang Richard
author_facet Mutero, Clifford Maina
Mbogo, Charles
Mwangangi, Joseph
Imbahale, Susan
Kibe, Lydia
Orindi, Benedict
Girma, Melaku
Njui, Annah
Lwande, Wilber
Affognon, Hippolyte
Gichuki, Charity
Mukabana, Wolfgang Richard
author_sort Mutero, Clifford Maina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends integrated vector management (IVM) as a strategy to improve and sustain malaria vector control. However, this approach has not been widely adopted. OBJECTIVES: We comprehensively assessed experiences and findings on IVM in Kenya with a view to sharing lessons that might promote its wider application. METHODS: The assessment used information from a qualitative external evaluation of two malaria IVM projects implemented between 2006 and 2011 and an analysis of their accumulated entomological and malaria case data. The project sites were Malindi and Nyabondo, located in coastal and western Kenya, respectively. The assessment focused on implementation of five key elements of IVM: integration of vector control methods, evidence-based decision making, intersectoral collaboration, advocacy and social mobilization, and capacity building. RESULTS: IVM was more successfully implemented in Malindi than in Nyabondo owing to greater community participation and multistakeholder engagement. There was a significant decline in the proportion of malaria cases among children admitted to Malindi Hospital, from 23.7% in 2006 to 10.47% in 2011 (p < 0.001). However, the projects’ operational research methodology did not allow statistical attribution of the decline in malaria and malaria vectors to specific IVM interventions or other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Sustaining IVM is likely to require strong participation and support from multiple actors, including community-based groups, non-governmental organizations, international and national research institutes, and various government ministries. A cluster-randomized controlled trial would be essential to quantify the effectiveness and impact of specific IVM interventions, alone or in combination. CITATION: Mutero CM, Mbogo C, Mwangangi J, Imbahale S, Kibe L, Orindi B, Girma M, Njui A, Lwande W, Affognon H, Gichuki C, Mukabana WR. 2015. An assessment of participatory integrated vector management for malaria control in Kenya. Environ Health Perspect 123:1145–1151; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408748
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4629737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46297372015-11-25 An Assessment of Participatory Integrated Vector Management for Malaria Control in Kenya Mutero, Clifford Maina Mbogo, Charles Mwangangi, Joseph Imbahale, Susan Kibe, Lydia Orindi, Benedict Girma, Melaku Njui, Annah Lwande, Wilber Affognon, Hippolyte Gichuki, Charity Mukabana, Wolfgang Richard Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends integrated vector management (IVM) as a strategy to improve and sustain malaria vector control. However, this approach has not been widely adopted. OBJECTIVES: We comprehensively assessed experiences and findings on IVM in Kenya with a view to sharing lessons that might promote its wider application. METHODS: The assessment used information from a qualitative external evaluation of two malaria IVM projects implemented between 2006 and 2011 and an analysis of their accumulated entomological and malaria case data. The project sites were Malindi and Nyabondo, located in coastal and western Kenya, respectively. The assessment focused on implementation of five key elements of IVM: integration of vector control methods, evidence-based decision making, intersectoral collaboration, advocacy and social mobilization, and capacity building. RESULTS: IVM was more successfully implemented in Malindi than in Nyabondo owing to greater community participation and multistakeholder engagement. There was a significant decline in the proportion of malaria cases among children admitted to Malindi Hospital, from 23.7% in 2006 to 10.47% in 2011 (p < 0.001). However, the projects’ operational research methodology did not allow statistical attribution of the decline in malaria and malaria vectors to specific IVM interventions or other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Sustaining IVM is likely to require strong participation and support from multiple actors, including community-based groups, non-governmental organizations, international and national research institutes, and various government ministries. A cluster-randomized controlled trial would be essential to quantify the effectiveness and impact of specific IVM interventions, alone or in combination. CITATION: Mutero CM, Mbogo C, Mwangangi J, Imbahale S, Kibe L, Orindi B, Girma M, Njui A, Lwande W, Affognon H, Gichuki C, Mukabana WR. 2015. An assessment of participatory integrated vector management for malaria control in Kenya. Environ Health Perspect 123:1145–1151; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408748 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2015-04-10 2015-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4629737/ /pubmed/25859686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408748 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Research
Mutero, Clifford Maina
Mbogo, Charles
Mwangangi, Joseph
Imbahale, Susan
Kibe, Lydia
Orindi, Benedict
Girma, Melaku
Njui, Annah
Lwande, Wilber
Affognon, Hippolyte
Gichuki, Charity
Mukabana, Wolfgang Richard
An Assessment of Participatory Integrated Vector Management for Malaria Control in Kenya
title An Assessment of Participatory Integrated Vector Management for Malaria Control in Kenya
title_full An Assessment of Participatory Integrated Vector Management for Malaria Control in Kenya
title_fullStr An Assessment of Participatory Integrated Vector Management for Malaria Control in Kenya
title_full_unstemmed An Assessment of Participatory Integrated Vector Management for Malaria Control in Kenya
title_short An Assessment of Participatory Integrated Vector Management for Malaria Control in Kenya
title_sort assessment of participatory integrated vector management for malaria control in kenya
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25859686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408748
work_keys_str_mv AT muterocliffordmaina anassessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT mbogocharles anassessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT mwangangijoseph anassessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT imbahalesusan anassessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT kibelydia anassessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT orindibenedict anassessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT girmamelaku anassessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT njuiannah anassessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT lwandewilber anassessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT affognonhippolyte anassessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT gichukicharity anassessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT mukabanawolfgangrichard anassessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT muterocliffordmaina assessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT mbogocharles assessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT mwangangijoseph assessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT imbahalesusan assessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT kibelydia assessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT orindibenedict assessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT girmamelaku assessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT njuiannah assessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT lwandewilber assessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT affognonhippolyte assessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT gichukicharity assessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya
AT mukabanawolfgangrichard assessmentofparticipatoryintegratedvectormanagementformalariacontrolinkenya