Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of continuous intercostal nerve block or epidural analgesia on the rate of respiratory complications, intensive care unit, and hospital stay following traumatic rib fractures: a retrospective review

BACKGROUND: Thoracic trauma accounts for 10%–15% of all trauma admissions. Rib fractures are the most common injury following blunt thoracic trauma. Epidural analgesia improves patient outcomes but is not without problems. The use of continuous intercostal nerve blockade (CINB) may offer superior pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Britt, Todd, Sturm, Ryan, Ricardi, Rick, Labond, Virginia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26604819
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S80498
_version_ 1782398645936586752
author Britt, Todd
Sturm, Ryan
Ricardi, Rick
Labond, Virginia
author_facet Britt, Todd
Sturm, Ryan
Ricardi, Rick
Labond, Virginia
author_sort Britt, Todd
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Thoracic trauma accounts for 10%–15% of all trauma admissions. Rib fractures are the most common injury following blunt thoracic trauma. Epidural analgesia improves patient outcomes but is not without problems. The use of continuous intercostal nerve blockade (CINB) may offer superior pain control with fewer side effects. This study’s objective was to compare the rate of pulmonary complications when traumatic rib fractures were treated with CINB vs epidurals. METHODS: A hospital trauma registry provided retrospective data from 2008 to 2013 for patients with 2 or more traumatic rib fractures. All subjects were admitted and were treated with either an epidural or a subcutaneously placed catheter for continuous intercostal nerve blockade. Our primary outcome was a composite of either pneumonia or respiratory failure. Secondary outcomes included total hospital days, total ICU days, and days on the ventilator. RESULTS: 12.5% (N=8) of the CINB group developed pneumonia or had respiratory failure compared to 16.3% (N=7) in the epidural group. No statistical difference (P=0.58) in the incidence of pneumonia or vent dependent respiratory failure was observed. There was a significant reduction (P=0.05) in hospital days from 9.72 (SD 9.98) in the epidural compared to 6.98 (SD 4.67) in the CINB group. The rest of our secondary outcomes showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: This study did not show a difference in the rate of pneumonia or ventilator-dependent respiratory failure in the CINB vs epidural groups. It was not sufficiently powered. Our data supports a reduction in hospital days when CINB is used vs epidural. CINB may have advantages over epidurals such as fewer complications, fewer contraindications, and a shorter time to placement. Further studies are needed to confirm these statements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4629963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46299632015-11-24 Comparative evaluation of continuous intercostal nerve block or epidural analgesia on the rate of respiratory complications, intensive care unit, and hospital stay following traumatic rib fractures: a retrospective review Britt, Todd Sturm, Ryan Ricardi, Rick Labond, Virginia Local Reg Anesth Original Research BACKGROUND: Thoracic trauma accounts for 10%–15% of all trauma admissions. Rib fractures are the most common injury following blunt thoracic trauma. Epidural analgesia improves patient outcomes but is not without problems. The use of continuous intercostal nerve blockade (CINB) may offer superior pain control with fewer side effects. This study’s objective was to compare the rate of pulmonary complications when traumatic rib fractures were treated with CINB vs epidurals. METHODS: A hospital trauma registry provided retrospective data from 2008 to 2013 for patients with 2 or more traumatic rib fractures. All subjects were admitted and were treated with either an epidural or a subcutaneously placed catheter for continuous intercostal nerve blockade. Our primary outcome was a composite of either pneumonia or respiratory failure. Secondary outcomes included total hospital days, total ICU days, and days on the ventilator. RESULTS: 12.5% (N=8) of the CINB group developed pneumonia or had respiratory failure compared to 16.3% (N=7) in the epidural group. No statistical difference (P=0.58) in the incidence of pneumonia or vent dependent respiratory failure was observed. There was a significant reduction (P=0.05) in hospital days from 9.72 (SD 9.98) in the epidural compared to 6.98 (SD 4.67) in the CINB group. The rest of our secondary outcomes showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: This study did not show a difference in the rate of pneumonia or ventilator-dependent respiratory failure in the CINB vs epidural groups. It was not sufficiently powered. Our data supports a reduction in hospital days when CINB is used vs epidural. CINB may have advantages over epidurals such as fewer complications, fewer contraindications, and a shorter time to placement. Further studies are needed to confirm these statements. Dove Medical Press 2015-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4629963/ /pubmed/26604819 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S80498 Text en © 2015 Britt et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Britt, Todd
Sturm, Ryan
Ricardi, Rick
Labond, Virginia
Comparative evaluation of continuous intercostal nerve block or epidural analgesia on the rate of respiratory complications, intensive care unit, and hospital stay following traumatic rib fractures: a retrospective review
title Comparative evaluation of continuous intercostal nerve block or epidural analgesia on the rate of respiratory complications, intensive care unit, and hospital stay following traumatic rib fractures: a retrospective review
title_full Comparative evaluation of continuous intercostal nerve block or epidural analgesia on the rate of respiratory complications, intensive care unit, and hospital stay following traumatic rib fractures: a retrospective review
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of continuous intercostal nerve block or epidural analgesia on the rate of respiratory complications, intensive care unit, and hospital stay following traumatic rib fractures: a retrospective review
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of continuous intercostal nerve block or epidural analgesia on the rate of respiratory complications, intensive care unit, and hospital stay following traumatic rib fractures: a retrospective review
title_short Comparative evaluation of continuous intercostal nerve block or epidural analgesia on the rate of respiratory complications, intensive care unit, and hospital stay following traumatic rib fractures: a retrospective review
title_sort comparative evaluation of continuous intercostal nerve block or epidural analgesia on the rate of respiratory complications, intensive care unit, and hospital stay following traumatic rib fractures: a retrospective review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26604819
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S80498
work_keys_str_mv AT britttodd comparativeevaluationofcontinuousintercostalnerveblockorepiduralanalgesiaontherateofrespiratorycomplicationsintensivecareunitandhospitalstayfollowingtraumaticribfracturesaretrospectivereview
AT sturmryan comparativeevaluationofcontinuousintercostalnerveblockorepiduralanalgesiaontherateofrespiratorycomplicationsintensivecareunitandhospitalstayfollowingtraumaticribfracturesaretrospectivereview
AT ricardirick comparativeevaluationofcontinuousintercostalnerveblockorepiduralanalgesiaontherateofrespiratorycomplicationsintensivecareunitandhospitalstayfollowingtraumaticribfracturesaretrospectivereview
AT labondvirginia comparativeevaluationofcontinuousintercostalnerveblockorepiduralanalgesiaontherateofrespiratorycomplicationsintensivecareunitandhospitalstayfollowingtraumaticribfracturesaretrospectivereview