Cargando…
Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency
Sign-tracking rats show heightened sensitivity to food- and drug-associated cues, which serve as strong incentives for driving reward seeking. We hypothesized that this enhanced incentive drive is accompanied by an inflexibility when incentive value changes. To examine this we tested rats in Pavlovi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26578917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00289 |
_version_ | 1782398675551518720 |
---|---|
author | Nasser, Helen M. Chen, Yu-Wei Fiscella, Kimberly Calu, Donna J. |
author_facet | Nasser, Helen M. Chen, Yu-Wei Fiscella, Kimberly Calu, Donna J. |
author_sort | Nasser, Helen M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sign-tracking rats show heightened sensitivity to food- and drug-associated cues, which serve as strong incentives for driving reward seeking. We hypothesized that this enhanced incentive drive is accompanied by an inflexibility when incentive value changes. To examine this we tested rats in Pavlovian outcome devaluation or second-order conditioning prior to the assessment of sign-tracking tendency. To assess behavioral flexibility we trained rats to associate a light with a food outcome. After the food was devalued by pairing with illness, we measured conditioned responding (CR) to the light during an outcome devaluation probe test. The level of CR during outcome devaluation probe test correlated with the rats' subsequent tracking tendency, with sign-tracking rats failing to suppress CR to the light after outcome devaluation. To assess Pavlovian incentive learning, we trained rats on first-order (CS+, CS−) and second-order (SOCS+, SOCS−) discriminations. After second-order conditioning, we measured CR to the second-order cues during a probe test. Second-order conditioning was observed across all rats regardless of tracking tendency. The behavioral inflexibility of sign-trackers has potential relevance for understanding individual variation in vulnerability to drug addiction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4630296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46302962015-11-17 Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency Nasser, Helen M. Chen, Yu-Wei Fiscella, Kimberly Calu, Donna J. Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Sign-tracking rats show heightened sensitivity to food- and drug-associated cues, which serve as strong incentives for driving reward seeking. We hypothesized that this enhanced incentive drive is accompanied by an inflexibility when incentive value changes. To examine this we tested rats in Pavlovian outcome devaluation or second-order conditioning prior to the assessment of sign-tracking tendency. To assess behavioral flexibility we trained rats to associate a light with a food outcome. After the food was devalued by pairing with illness, we measured conditioned responding (CR) to the light during an outcome devaluation probe test. The level of CR during outcome devaluation probe test correlated with the rats' subsequent tracking tendency, with sign-tracking rats failing to suppress CR to the light after outcome devaluation. To assess Pavlovian incentive learning, we trained rats on first-order (CS+, CS−) and second-order (SOCS+, SOCS−) discriminations. After second-order conditioning, we measured CR to the second-order cues during a probe test. Second-order conditioning was observed across all rats regardless of tracking tendency. The behavioral inflexibility of sign-trackers has potential relevance for understanding individual variation in vulnerability to drug addiction. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4630296/ /pubmed/26578917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00289 Text en Copyright © 2015 Nasser, Chen, Fiscella and Calu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Nasser, Helen M. Chen, Yu-Wei Fiscella, Kimberly Calu, Donna J. Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency |
title | Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency |
title_full | Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency |
title_fullStr | Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency |
title_full_unstemmed | Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency |
title_short | Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency |
title_sort | individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26578917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nasserhelenm individualvariabilityinbehavioralflexibilitypredictssigntrackingtendency AT chenyuwei individualvariabilityinbehavioralflexibilitypredictssigntrackingtendency AT fiscellakimberly individualvariabilityinbehavioralflexibilitypredictssigntrackingtendency AT caludonnaj individualvariabilityinbehavioralflexibilitypredictssigntrackingtendency |