Cargando…

Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency

Sign-tracking rats show heightened sensitivity to food- and drug-associated cues, which serve as strong incentives for driving reward seeking. We hypothesized that this enhanced incentive drive is accompanied by an inflexibility when incentive value changes. To examine this we tested rats in Pavlovi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nasser, Helen M., Chen, Yu-Wei, Fiscella, Kimberly, Calu, Donna J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26578917
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00289
_version_ 1782398675551518720
author Nasser, Helen M.
Chen, Yu-Wei
Fiscella, Kimberly
Calu, Donna J.
author_facet Nasser, Helen M.
Chen, Yu-Wei
Fiscella, Kimberly
Calu, Donna J.
author_sort Nasser, Helen M.
collection PubMed
description Sign-tracking rats show heightened sensitivity to food- and drug-associated cues, which serve as strong incentives for driving reward seeking. We hypothesized that this enhanced incentive drive is accompanied by an inflexibility when incentive value changes. To examine this we tested rats in Pavlovian outcome devaluation or second-order conditioning prior to the assessment of sign-tracking tendency. To assess behavioral flexibility we trained rats to associate a light with a food outcome. After the food was devalued by pairing with illness, we measured conditioned responding (CR) to the light during an outcome devaluation probe test. The level of CR during outcome devaluation probe test correlated with the rats' subsequent tracking tendency, with sign-tracking rats failing to suppress CR to the light after outcome devaluation. To assess Pavlovian incentive learning, we trained rats on first-order (CS+, CS−) and second-order (SOCS+, SOCS−) discriminations. After second-order conditioning, we measured CR to the second-order cues during a probe test. Second-order conditioning was observed across all rats regardless of tracking tendency. The behavioral inflexibility of sign-trackers has potential relevance for understanding individual variation in vulnerability to drug addiction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4630296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46302962015-11-17 Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency Nasser, Helen M. Chen, Yu-Wei Fiscella, Kimberly Calu, Donna J. Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Sign-tracking rats show heightened sensitivity to food- and drug-associated cues, which serve as strong incentives for driving reward seeking. We hypothesized that this enhanced incentive drive is accompanied by an inflexibility when incentive value changes. To examine this we tested rats in Pavlovian outcome devaluation or second-order conditioning prior to the assessment of sign-tracking tendency. To assess behavioral flexibility we trained rats to associate a light with a food outcome. After the food was devalued by pairing with illness, we measured conditioned responding (CR) to the light during an outcome devaluation probe test. The level of CR during outcome devaluation probe test correlated with the rats' subsequent tracking tendency, with sign-tracking rats failing to suppress CR to the light after outcome devaluation. To assess Pavlovian incentive learning, we trained rats on first-order (CS+, CS−) and second-order (SOCS+, SOCS−) discriminations. After second-order conditioning, we measured CR to the second-order cues during a probe test. Second-order conditioning was observed across all rats regardless of tracking tendency. The behavioral inflexibility of sign-trackers has potential relevance for understanding individual variation in vulnerability to drug addiction. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4630296/ /pubmed/26578917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00289 Text en Copyright © 2015 Nasser, Chen, Fiscella and Calu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Nasser, Helen M.
Chen, Yu-Wei
Fiscella, Kimberly
Calu, Donna J.
Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency
title Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency
title_full Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency
title_fullStr Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency
title_full_unstemmed Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency
title_short Individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency
title_sort individual variability in behavioral flexibility predicts sign-tracking tendency
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26578917
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00289
work_keys_str_mv AT nasserhelenm individualvariabilityinbehavioralflexibilitypredictssigntrackingtendency
AT chenyuwei individualvariabilityinbehavioralflexibilitypredictssigntrackingtendency
AT fiscellakimberly individualvariabilityinbehavioralflexibilitypredictssigntrackingtendency
AT caludonnaj individualvariabilityinbehavioralflexibilitypredictssigntrackingtendency