Cargando…

Effect of misoprostol for cervical priming before gynecological procedures on nonpregnant premenopausal women

BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is very effective in cervical ripening and is used for termination of pregnancy. A similar effect on the nonpregnant uterus will facilitate gynecological operations, and hence we assessed the effect of misoprostol on the nonpregnant uterus of premenopausal women. MATERIALS AN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saha, Monimala, Chakraborty, Aparna, Chattopadhyay, Sandip, Saha, Subhendu, Paul, Joydip, Das, Anjan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26604599
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.166116
_version_ 1782398762330619904
author Saha, Monimala
Chakraborty, Aparna
Chattopadhyay, Sandip
Saha, Subhendu
Paul, Joydip
Das, Anjan
author_facet Saha, Monimala
Chakraborty, Aparna
Chattopadhyay, Sandip
Saha, Subhendu
Paul, Joydip
Das, Anjan
author_sort Saha, Monimala
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is very effective in cervical ripening and is used for termination of pregnancy. A similar effect on the nonpregnant uterus will facilitate gynecological operations, and hence we assessed the effect of misoprostol on the nonpregnant uterus of premenopausal women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial, 280 women were randomly allocated into two groups (12 women did not complete the intervention). Study (A) and control (B) group received 400 μg of misoprostol or 400 mg of metronidazole tablets (as a placebo) respectively in the posterior vaginal wall 6 h prior to gynecological procedures. RESULTS: The mean cervical dilatation was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in misoprostol compared to placebo group (4.6 ± 0.96 mm vs. 3.6 ± 0.82 mm), benefit were also observed on secondary outcome measures which were need for further dilatation, time taken for further dilatation, ease of dilatation, subjective assessment of pain by visual analog scale. Only 3.61% patients complained of intolerable pain during dilatation in the study group while in control group 48.74% complained of intolerable pain and required anesthesia. Most common side effects of misoprostol were abdominal pain and mild vaginal bleeding. CONCLUSION: Misoprostol was effective in cervical ripening of nonpregnant premenopausal uterus to facilitate gynecological procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4630743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46307432015-11-24 Effect of misoprostol for cervical priming before gynecological procedures on nonpregnant premenopausal women Saha, Monimala Chakraborty, Aparna Chattopadhyay, Sandip Saha, Subhendu Paul, Joydip Das, Anjan J Nat Sci Biol Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is very effective in cervical ripening and is used for termination of pregnancy. A similar effect on the nonpregnant uterus will facilitate gynecological operations, and hence we assessed the effect of misoprostol on the nonpregnant uterus of premenopausal women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial, 280 women were randomly allocated into two groups (12 women did not complete the intervention). Study (A) and control (B) group received 400 μg of misoprostol or 400 mg of metronidazole tablets (as a placebo) respectively in the posterior vaginal wall 6 h prior to gynecological procedures. RESULTS: The mean cervical dilatation was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in misoprostol compared to placebo group (4.6 ± 0.96 mm vs. 3.6 ± 0.82 mm), benefit were also observed on secondary outcome measures which were need for further dilatation, time taken for further dilatation, ease of dilatation, subjective assessment of pain by visual analog scale. Only 3.61% patients complained of intolerable pain during dilatation in the study group while in control group 48.74% complained of intolerable pain and required anesthesia. Most common side effects of misoprostol were abdominal pain and mild vaginal bleeding. CONCLUSION: Misoprostol was effective in cervical ripening of nonpregnant premenopausal uterus to facilitate gynecological procedures. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4630743/ /pubmed/26604599 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.166116 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Saha, Monimala
Chakraborty, Aparna
Chattopadhyay, Sandip
Saha, Subhendu
Paul, Joydip
Das, Anjan
Effect of misoprostol for cervical priming before gynecological procedures on nonpregnant premenopausal women
title Effect of misoprostol for cervical priming before gynecological procedures on nonpregnant premenopausal women
title_full Effect of misoprostol for cervical priming before gynecological procedures on nonpregnant premenopausal women
title_fullStr Effect of misoprostol for cervical priming before gynecological procedures on nonpregnant premenopausal women
title_full_unstemmed Effect of misoprostol for cervical priming before gynecological procedures on nonpregnant premenopausal women
title_short Effect of misoprostol for cervical priming before gynecological procedures on nonpregnant premenopausal women
title_sort effect of misoprostol for cervical priming before gynecological procedures on nonpregnant premenopausal women
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26604599
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.166116
work_keys_str_mv AT sahamonimala effectofmisoprostolforcervicalprimingbeforegynecologicalproceduresonnonpregnantpremenopausalwomen
AT chakrabortyaparna effectofmisoprostolforcervicalprimingbeforegynecologicalproceduresonnonpregnantpremenopausalwomen
AT chattopadhyaysandip effectofmisoprostolforcervicalprimingbeforegynecologicalproceduresonnonpregnantpremenopausalwomen
AT sahasubhendu effectofmisoprostolforcervicalprimingbeforegynecologicalproceduresonnonpregnantpremenopausalwomen
AT pauljoydip effectofmisoprostolforcervicalprimingbeforegynecologicalproceduresonnonpregnantpremenopausalwomen
AT dasanjan effectofmisoprostolforcervicalprimingbeforegynecologicalproceduresonnonpregnantpremenopausalwomen