Cargando…

A prospective study evaluating utility of Mannheim peritonitis index in predicting prognosis of perforation peritonitis

AIMS: We aimed to validate Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI) for prediction of outcome in patients with perforation peritonitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study involving 100 subjects operated for perforation peritonitis over the period of 2 years was designed. Postevaluation of predesigne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Rajesh, Ranjan, Vikrant, Jain, Suraj, Joshi, Tulika, Tyagi, Anurag, Chaphekar, Rohan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26604619
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.166076
_version_ 1782398766990491648
author Sharma, Rajesh
Ranjan, Vikrant
Jain, Suraj
Joshi, Tulika
Tyagi, Anurag
Chaphekar, Rohan
author_facet Sharma, Rajesh
Ranjan, Vikrant
Jain, Suraj
Joshi, Tulika
Tyagi, Anurag
Chaphekar, Rohan
author_sort Sharma, Rajesh
collection PubMed
description AIMS: We aimed to validate Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI) for prediction of outcome in patients with perforation peritonitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study involving 100 subjects operated for perforation peritonitis over the period of 2 years was designed. Postevaluation of predesigned performa, MPI score was calculated and analyzed for each patient with death being the main outcome measure. The MPI scores were divided into three categories; scores <15 (category 1), 16-25 (category 2), and >25 (category 3). RESULTS: Our study consisted of 82 males and 18 females (male:female ratio 4.56:1), with the mean patients age of 37.96 ± 17.49 years. 47, 26, and 27 cases belonged to MPI score categories 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The most common origin of sepsis was ileal with small intestine dominating the source of perforation. When the individual parameters of MPI score were assessed against the mortality only, age >50 years (P = 0.015), organ failure (P = 0.0001), noncolonic origin of sepsis (P = 0.002), and generalized peritonitis (P = 0.0001) significantly associated with mortality. The sensitivity of MPI was 92% with a specificity of 78% in receiver operating characteristic curves. CONCLUSION: MPI is an effective tool for prediction of mortality in cases of perforation peritonitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4630763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46307632015-11-24 A prospective study evaluating utility of Mannheim peritonitis index in predicting prognosis of perforation peritonitis Sharma, Rajesh Ranjan, Vikrant Jain, Suraj Joshi, Tulika Tyagi, Anurag Chaphekar, Rohan J Nat Sci Biol Med Original Article AIMS: We aimed to validate Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI) for prediction of outcome in patients with perforation peritonitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study involving 100 subjects operated for perforation peritonitis over the period of 2 years was designed. Postevaluation of predesigned performa, MPI score was calculated and analyzed for each patient with death being the main outcome measure. The MPI scores were divided into three categories; scores <15 (category 1), 16-25 (category 2), and >25 (category 3). RESULTS: Our study consisted of 82 males and 18 females (male:female ratio 4.56:1), with the mean patients age of 37.96 ± 17.49 years. 47, 26, and 27 cases belonged to MPI score categories 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The most common origin of sepsis was ileal with small intestine dominating the source of perforation. When the individual parameters of MPI score were assessed against the mortality only, age >50 years (P = 0.015), organ failure (P = 0.0001), noncolonic origin of sepsis (P = 0.002), and generalized peritonitis (P = 0.0001) significantly associated with mortality. The sensitivity of MPI was 92% with a specificity of 78% in receiver operating characteristic curves. CONCLUSION: MPI is an effective tool for prediction of mortality in cases of perforation peritonitis. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4630763/ /pubmed/26604619 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.166076 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Rajesh
Ranjan, Vikrant
Jain, Suraj
Joshi, Tulika
Tyagi, Anurag
Chaphekar, Rohan
A prospective study evaluating utility of Mannheim peritonitis index in predicting prognosis of perforation peritonitis
title A prospective study evaluating utility of Mannheim peritonitis index in predicting prognosis of perforation peritonitis
title_full A prospective study evaluating utility of Mannheim peritonitis index in predicting prognosis of perforation peritonitis
title_fullStr A prospective study evaluating utility of Mannheim peritonitis index in predicting prognosis of perforation peritonitis
title_full_unstemmed A prospective study evaluating utility of Mannheim peritonitis index in predicting prognosis of perforation peritonitis
title_short A prospective study evaluating utility of Mannheim peritonitis index in predicting prognosis of perforation peritonitis
title_sort prospective study evaluating utility of mannheim peritonitis index in predicting prognosis of perforation peritonitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26604619
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.166076
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmarajesh aprospectivestudyevaluatingutilityofmannheimperitonitisindexinpredictingprognosisofperforationperitonitis
AT ranjanvikrant aprospectivestudyevaluatingutilityofmannheimperitonitisindexinpredictingprognosisofperforationperitonitis
AT jainsuraj aprospectivestudyevaluatingutilityofmannheimperitonitisindexinpredictingprognosisofperforationperitonitis
AT joshitulika aprospectivestudyevaluatingutilityofmannheimperitonitisindexinpredictingprognosisofperforationperitonitis
AT tyagianurag aprospectivestudyevaluatingutilityofmannheimperitonitisindexinpredictingprognosisofperforationperitonitis
AT chaphekarrohan aprospectivestudyevaluatingutilityofmannheimperitonitisindexinpredictingprognosisofperforationperitonitis
AT sharmarajesh prospectivestudyevaluatingutilityofmannheimperitonitisindexinpredictingprognosisofperforationperitonitis
AT ranjanvikrant prospectivestudyevaluatingutilityofmannheimperitonitisindexinpredictingprognosisofperforationperitonitis
AT jainsuraj prospectivestudyevaluatingutilityofmannheimperitonitisindexinpredictingprognosisofperforationperitonitis
AT joshitulika prospectivestudyevaluatingutilityofmannheimperitonitisindexinpredictingprognosisofperforationperitonitis
AT tyagianurag prospectivestudyevaluatingutilityofmannheimperitonitisindexinpredictingprognosisofperforationperitonitis
AT chaphekarrohan prospectivestudyevaluatingutilityofmannheimperitonitisindexinpredictingprognosisofperforationperitonitis