Cargando…
Comparative clinical efficacy evaluation of three gingival displacement systems
AIM: We compared the clinical efficacy of three gingival displacement systems to accurately record intra-crevicular margins of tooth preparation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One mechanical (magic foam cord) and two chemico-mechanical (expasyl paste and retraction cord impregnated with 15% aluminum chlori...
Autores principales: | Shrivastava, Kirti Jajoo, Bhoyar, Anjali, Agarwal, Surendra, Shrivastava, Saurabh, Parlani, Swapnil, Murthy, Varsha |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26604620 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.166082 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Prosthetic rehabilitation of large mid-facial defect with magnet-retained silicone prosthesis
por: Shrivastava, Kirti Jajoo, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Stress distribution among periodontally compromised abutments: A comparative study using three-dimensional finite element analysis
por: Chitumalla, Rajkiran, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
A cross-sectional study to explore the reasons to visit a quack for prosthodontic solutions
por: Parlani, Swapnil, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Comparative evaluation of three noninvasive gingival displacement systems: An in vivo study
por: Thimmappa, Meenakshi, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy
por: Gajbhiye, Vijeta, et al.
Publicado: (2019)