Cargando…
Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL(©)): streamlining the systematic review process and creating utility for evidence-based health care
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are widely recognized as the best means of synthesizing clinical research. However, traditional approaches can be costly and time-consuming and can be subject to selection and judgment bias. It can also be difficult to interpret the results of a SR in a meaningfu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26525982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1604-z |
_version_ | 1782398779007172608 |
---|---|
author | Crawford, Cindy Boyd, Courtney Jain, Shamini Khorsan, Raheleh Jonas, Wayne |
author_facet | Crawford, Cindy Boyd, Courtney Jain, Shamini Khorsan, Raheleh Jonas, Wayne |
author_sort | Crawford, Cindy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are widely recognized as the best means of synthesizing clinical research. However, traditional approaches can be costly and time-consuming and can be subject to selection and judgment bias. It can also be difficult to interpret the results of a SR in a meaningful way in order to make research recommendations, clinical or policy decisions, or practice guidelines. Samueli Institute has developed the Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL) SR process to address these issues. REAL provides up-to-date, rigorous, high quality SR information on health care practices, products, or programs in a streamlined, efficient and reliable manner. This process is a component of the Scientific Evaluation and Review of Claims in Health Care (SEaRCH™) program developed by Samueli Institute, which aims at answering the question of “What works?” in health care. METHODS/DESIGN: The REAL process (1) tailors a standardized search strategy to a specific and relevant research question developed with various stakeholders to survey the available literature; (2) evaluates the quantity and quality of the literature using structured tools and rulebooks to ensure objectivity, reliability and reproducibility of reviewer ratings in an independent fashion and; (3) obtains formalized, balanced input from trained subject matter experts on the implications of the evidence for future research and current practice. RESULTS: Online tools and quality assurance processes are utilized for each step of the review to ensure a rapid, rigorous, reliable, transparent and reproducible SR process. CONCLUSIONS: The REAL is a rapid SR process developed to streamline and aid in the rigorous and reliable evaluation and review of claims in health care in order to make evidence-based, informed decisions, and has been used by a variety of organizations aiming to gain insight into “what works” in health care. Using the REAL system allows for the facilitation of recommendations on appropriate next steps in policy, funding, and research and for making clinical and field decisions in a timely, transparent, and cost-effective manner. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4630849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46308492015-11-03 Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL(©)): streamlining the systematic review process and creating utility for evidence-based health care Crawford, Cindy Boyd, Courtney Jain, Shamini Khorsan, Raheleh Jonas, Wayne BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are widely recognized as the best means of synthesizing clinical research. However, traditional approaches can be costly and time-consuming and can be subject to selection and judgment bias. It can also be difficult to interpret the results of a SR in a meaningful way in order to make research recommendations, clinical or policy decisions, or practice guidelines. Samueli Institute has developed the Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL) SR process to address these issues. REAL provides up-to-date, rigorous, high quality SR information on health care practices, products, or programs in a streamlined, efficient and reliable manner. This process is a component of the Scientific Evaluation and Review of Claims in Health Care (SEaRCH™) program developed by Samueli Institute, which aims at answering the question of “What works?” in health care. METHODS/DESIGN: The REAL process (1) tailors a standardized search strategy to a specific and relevant research question developed with various stakeholders to survey the available literature; (2) evaluates the quantity and quality of the literature using structured tools and rulebooks to ensure objectivity, reliability and reproducibility of reviewer ratings in an independent fashion and; (3) obtains formalized, balanced input from trained subject matter experts on the implications of the evidence for future research and current practice. RESULTS: Online tools and quality assurance processes are utilized for each step of the review to ensure a rapid, rigorous, reliable, transparent and reproducible SR process. CONCLUSIONS: The REAL is a rapid SR process developed to streamline and aid in the rigorous and reliable evaluation and review of claims in health care in order to make evidence-based, informed decisions, and has been used by a variety of organizations aiming to gain insight into “what works” in health care. Using the REAL system allows for the facilitation of recommendations on appropriate next steps in policy, funding, and research and for making clinical and field decisions in a timely, transparent, and cost-effective manner. BioMed Central 2015-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4630849/ /pubmed/26525982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1604-z Text en © Crawford et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Crawford, Cindy Boyd, Courtney Jain, Shamini Khorsan, Raheleh Jonas, Wayne Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL(©)): streamlining the systematic review process and creating utility for evidence-based health care |
title | Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL(©)): streamlining the systematic review process and creating utility for evidence-based health care |
title_full | Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL(©)): streamlining the systematic review process and creating utility for evidence-based health care |
title_fullStr | Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL(©)): streamlining the systematic review process and creating utility for evidence-based health care |
title_full_unstemmed | Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL(©)): streamlining the systematic review process and creating utility for evidence-based health care |
title_short | Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL(©)): streamlining the systematic review process and creating utility for evidence-based health care |
title_sort | rapid evidence assessment of the literature (real(©)): streamlining the systematic review process and creating utility for evidence-based health care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26525982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1604-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crawfordcindy rapidevidenceassessmentoftheliteraturerealstreamliningthesystematicreviewprocessandcreatingutilityforevidencebasedhealthcare AT boydcourtney rapidevidenceassessmentoftheliteraturerealstreamliningthesystematicreviewprocessandcreatingutilityforevidencebasedhealthcare AT jainshamini rapidevidenceassessmentoftheliteraturerealstreamliningthesystematicreviewprocessandcreatingutilityforevidencebasedhealthcare AT khorsanraheleh rapidevidenceassessmentoftheliteraturerealstreamliningthesystematicreviewprocessandcreatingutilityforevidencebasedhealthcare AT jonaswayne rapidevidenceassessmentoftheliteraturerealstreamliningthesystematicreviewprocessandcreatingutilityforevidencebasedhealthcare |