Cargando…

How to understand the results of studies of glutamine supplementation

The lack of understanding of the mechanisms behind possible beneficial and possible harmful effects of glutamine supplementation makes the design of interventional studies of glutamine supplementations difficult, perhaps even hazardous. What is the interventional target, and how might it relate to o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wernerman, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26526496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1090-7
_version_ 1782398788151803904
author Wernerman, Jan
author_facet Wernerman, Jan
author_sort Wernerman, Jan
collection PubMed
description The lack of understanding of the mechanisms behind possible beneficial and possible harmful effects of glutamine supplementation makes the design of interventional studies of glutamine supplementations difficult, perhaps even hazardous. What is the interventional target, and how might it relate to outcomes? Taking one step further and aggregating results from interventional studies into meta-analyses does not diminish the difficulties. Therefore, conducting basic research seems to be a better idea than groping in the dark and exposing patients to potential harm in this darkness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4630901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46309012015-11-04 How to understand the results of studies of glutamine supplementation Wernerman, Jan Crit Care Commentary The lack of understanding of the mechanisms behind possible beneficial and possible harmful effects of glutamine supplementation makes the design of interventional studies of glutamine supplementations difficult, perhaps even hazardous. What is the interventional target, and how might it relate to outcomes? Taking one step further and aggregating results from interventional studies into meta-analyses does not diminish the difficulties. Therefore, conducting basic research seems to be a better idea than groping in the dark and exposing patients to potential harm in this darkness. BioMed Central 2015-11-03 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4630901/ /pubmed/26526496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1090-7 Text en © Wernerman. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Wernerman, Jan
How to understand the results of studies of glutamine supplementation
title How to understand the results of studies of glutamine supplementation
title_full How to understand the results of studies of glutamine supplementation
title_fullStr How to understand the results of studies of glutamine supplementation
title_full_unstemmed How to understand the results of studies of glutamine supplementation
title_short How to understand the results of studies of glutamine supplementation
title_sort how to understand the results of studies of glutamine supplementation
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26526496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1090-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wernermanjan howtounderstandtheresultsofstudiesofglutaminesupplementation