Cargando…

Development of a questionnaire to measure primary care physicians’ scope of practice

BACKGROUND: Despite an increase in research devoted to primary care attributes, the patient benefits and educational aspects of broad scope practice of primary care physicians (PCPs) have not been well studied, due to a lack of validated measurement in each country. The objective of this study was t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ie, Kenya, Ichikawa, Shuhei, Takemura, Yousuke C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26526728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0357-z
_version_ 1782398791019659264
author Ie, Kenya
Ichikawa, Shuhei
Takemura, Yousuke C.
author_facet Ie, Kenya
Ichikawa, Shuhei
Takemura, Yousuke C.
author_sort Ie, Kenya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite an increase in research devoted to primary care attributes, the patient benefits and educational aspects of broad scope practice of primary care physicians (PCPs) have not been well studied, due to a lack of validated measurement in each country. The objective of this study was to develop and validate the Scope of Practice Inventory (SPI) to measure physicians’ scope of practice within the Japanese primary care setting. METHODS: The questionnaire was developed in seven phases: 1) item generation, 2) consensus method for necessity of each item, 3) Delphi process for the importance of each item, 4) pilot tests to limit the number of items, 5) preliminary cross-sectional study to examine factor structure and to validate the construct validity, 6) evaluation of internal consistency and intra-class reliability, and 7) evaluation of external validity. To confirm the interpretability of the SPI, the determinants of the SPI using a generalized linear model were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 359 items generated by a focus group, 180 reached a defined consensus on face and content validity after the Delphi process. After deletion of items with Kappa values less than 0.6, 120 items were selected for the preliminary study. The principle component analysis using responses from 451 PCPs eliminated 52 items. The final 68-point SPI had three subdomains: Inpatient care, 25 items; Urgent care and minor procedures, 27 items; and Ambulatory care, 16 items. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability for total SPI and each subdomain revealed acceptable reliability. Male sex, less years since graduation, working in a hospital, sub-urban or rural setting, having remote experience, and having board certification as a PCP were positively associated with higher SPI. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a self-administered 68-point scale, the SPI, which had satisfactory validity and reliability. Primary care quality and educational research using SPI are expected to contribute to comprehensive and efficient health care systems in the future. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0357-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4630913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46309132015-11-04 Development of a questionnaire to measure primary care physicians’ scope of practice Ie, Kenya Ichikawa, Shuhei Takemura, Yousuke C. BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite an increase in research devoted to primary care attributes, the patient benefits and educational aspects of broad scope practice of primary care physicians (PCPs) have not been well studied, due to a lack of validated measurement in each country. The objective of this study was to develop and validate the Scope of Practice Inventory (SPI) to measure physicians’ scope of practice within the Japanese primary care setting. METHODS: The questionnaire was developed in seven phases: 1) item generation, 2) consensus method for necessity of each item, 3) Delphi process for the importance of each item, 4) pilot tests to limit the number of items, 5) preliminary cross-sectional study to examine factor structure and to validate the construct validity, 6) evaluation of internal consistency and intra-class reliability, and 7) evaluation of external validity. To confirm the interpretability of the SPI, the determinants of the SPI using a generalized linear model were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 359 items generated by a focus group, 180 reached a defined consensus on face and content validity after the Delphi process. After deletion of items with Kappa values less than 0.6, 120 items were selected for the preliminary study. The principle component analysis using responses from 451 PCPs eliminated 52 items. The final 68-point SPI had three subdomains: Inpatient care, 25 items; Urgent care and minor procedures, 27 items; and Ambulatory care, 16 items. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability for total SPI and each subdomain revealed acceptable reliability. Male sex, less years since graduation, working in a hospital, sub-urban or rural setting, having remote experience, and having board certification as a PCP were positively associated with higher SPI. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a self-administered 68-point scale, the SPI, which had satisfactory validity and reliability. Primary care quality and educational research using SPI are expected to contribute to comprehensive and efficient health care systems in the future. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0357-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4630913/ /pubmed/26526728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0357-z Text en © Ie et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ie, Kenya
Ichikawa, Shuhei
Takemura, Yousuke C.
Development of a questionnaire to measure primary care physicians’ scope of practice
title Development of a questionnaire to measure primary care physicians’ scope of practice
title_full Development of a questionnaire to measure primary care physicians’ scope of practice
title_fullStr Development of a questionnaire to measure primary care physicians’ scope of practice
title_full_unstemmed Development of a questionnaire to measure primary care physicians’ scope of practice
title_short Development of a questionnaire to measure primary care physicians’ scope of practice
title_sort development of a questionnaire to measure primary care physicians’ scope of practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26526728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0357-z
work_keys_str_mv AT iekenya developmentofaquestionnairetomeasureprimarycarephysiciansscopeofpractice
AT ichikawashuhei developmentofaquestionnairetomeasureprimarycarephysiciansscopeofpractice
AT takemurayousukec developmentofaquestionnairetomeasureprimarycarephysiciansscopeofpractice