Cargando…

Indication criteria for cochlear implants and hearing aids: impact of audiological and non-audiological findings

Owing to technological progress and a growing body of clinical experience, indication criteria for cochlear implants (CI) are being extended to less severe hearing impairments. It is, therefore, worth reconsidering these indication criteria by introducing novel testing procedures. The diagnostic evi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haumann, Sabine, Hohmann, Volker, Meis, Markus, Herzke, Tobias, Lenarz, Thomas, Büchner, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557327
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e12
_version_ 1782398797599473664
author Haumann, Sabine
Hohmann, Volker
Meis, Markus
Herzke, Tobias
Lenarz, Thomas
Büchner, Andreas
author_facet Haumann, Sabine
Hohmann, Volker
Meis, Markus
Herzke, Tobias
Lenarz, Thomas
Büchner, Andreas
author_sort Haumann, Sabine
collection PubMed
description Owing to technological progress and a growing body of clinical experience, indication criteria for cochlear implants (CI) are being extended to less severe hearing impairments. It is, therefore, worth reconsidering these indication criteria by introducing novel testing procedures. The diagnostic evidence collected will be evaluated. The investigation includes postlingually deafened adults seeking a CI. Prior to surgery, speech perception tests [Freiburg Speech Test and Oldenburg sentence (OLSA) test] were performed unaided and aided using the Oldenburg Master Hearing Aid (MHA) system. Linguistic skills were assessed with the visual Text Reception Threshold (TRT) test, and general state of health, socio-economic status (SES) and subjective hearing were evaluated through questionnaires. After surgery, the speech tests were repeated aided with a CI. To date, 97 complete data sets are available for evaluation. Statistical analyses showed significant correlations between postsurgical speech reception threshold (SRT) measured with the adaptive OLSA test and pre-surgical data such as the TRT test (r=−0.29), SES (r=−0.22) and (if available) aided SRT (r=0.53). The results suggest that new measures and setups such as the TRT test, SES and speech perception with the MHA provide valuable extra information regarding indication for CI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4630941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher PAGEPress Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46309412015-11-09 Indication criteria for cochlear implants and hearing aids: impact of audiological and non-audiological findings Haumann, Sabine Hohmann, Volker Meis, Markus Herzke, Tobias Lenarz, Thomas Büchner, Andreas Audiol Res Article Owing to technological progress and a growing body of clinical experience, indication criteria for cochlear implants (CI) are being extended to less severe hearing impairments. It is, therefore, worth reconsidering these indication criteria by introducing novel testing procedures. The diagnostic evidence collected will be evaluated. The investigation includes postlingually deafened adults seeking a CI. Prior to surgery, speech perception tests [Freiburg Speech Test and Oldenburg sentence (OLSA) test] were performed unaided and aided using the Oldenburg Master Hearing Aid (MHA) system. Linguistic skills were assessed with the visual Text Reception Threshold (TRT) test, and general state of health, socio-economic status (SES) and subjective hearing were evaluated through questionnaires. After surgery, the speech tests were repeated aided with a CI. To date, 97 complete data sets are available for evaluation. Statistical analyses showed significant correlations between postsurgical speech reception threshold (SRT) measured with the adaptive OLSA test and pre-surgical data such as the TRT test (r=−0.29), SES (r=−0.22) and (if available) aided SRT (r=0.53). The results suggest that new measures and setups such as the TRT test, SES and speech perception with the MHA provide valuable extra information regarding indication for CI. PAGEPress Publications 2012-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4630941/ /pubmed/26557327 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e12 Text en ©Copyright S. Haumann et al., 2012 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Licensee PAGEPress, Italy
spellingShingle Article
Haumann, Sabine
Hohmann, Volker
Meis, Markus
Herzke, Tobias
Lenarz, Thomas
Büchner, Andreas
Indication criteria for cochlear implants and hearing aids: impact of audiological and non-audiological findings
title Indication criteria for cochlear implants and hearing aids: impact of audiological and non-audiological findings
title_full Indication criteria for cochlear implants and hearing aids: impact of audiological and non-audiological findings
title_fullStr Indication criteria for cochlear implants and hearing aids: impact of audiological and non-audiological findings
title_full_unstemmed Indication criteria for cochlear implants and hearing aids: impact of audiological and non-audiological findings
title_short Indication criteria for cochlear implants and hearing aids: impact of audiological and non-audiological findings
title_sort indication criteria for cochlear implants and hearing aids: impact of audiological and non-audiological findings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557327
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e12
work_keys_str_mv AT haumannsabine indicationcriteriaforcochlearimplantsandhearingaidsimpactofaudiologicalandnonaudiologicalfindings
AT hohmannvolker indicationcriteriaforcochlearimplantsandhearingaidsimpactofaudiologicalandnonaudiologicalfindings
AT meismarkus indicationcriteriaforcochlearimplantsandhearingaidsimpactofaudiologicalandnonaudiologicalfindings
AT herzketobias indicationcriteriaforcochlearimplantsandhearingaidsimpactofaudiologicalandnonaudiologicalfindings
AT lenarzthomas indicationcriteriaforcochlearimplantsandhearingaidsimpactofaudiologicalandnonaudiologicalfindings
AT buchnerandreas indicationcriteriaforcochlearimplantsandhearingaidsimpactofaudiologicalandnonaudiologicalfindings