Cargando…

Listening levels of teenage iPod users: does measurement approach matter?

The main objective of this study was to determine the influence of background noise levels and measurement approach on user-selected listening levels (USLLs) chosen by teenaged MP3 player users. It was hypothesized that the presence of background noise would (i) increase the USLL across all measurem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haines, Nicole C., Hodgetts, William E., Ostevik, Amberley V., Rieger, Jana M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557335
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e6
_version_ 1782398798329282560
author Haines, Nicole C.
Hodgetts, William E.
Ostevik, Amberley V.
Rieger, Jana M.
author_facet Haines, Nicole C.
Hodgetts, William E.
Ostevik, Amberley V.
Rieger, Jana M.
author_sort Haines, Nicole C.
collection PubMed
description The main objective of this study was to determine the influence of background noise levels and measurement approach on user-selected listening levels (USLLs) chosen by teenaged MP3 player users. It was hypothesized that the presence of background noise would (i) increase the USLL across all measurement approaches, (ii) result in no significant USLL differences between survey reports, objective lab measures or calibrated self-report field measures, and (iii) cause no interaction effect between level of background noise and measurement approach. There were two independent variables in this study: the level of background noise and measurement approach. The first independent variable, level of background noise, had two levels: quiet and transportation noise. The second independent variable, measurement approach, had three levels: survey, objective in-ear lab measurement and calibrated self-report field measurement. The dependent variable was ear canal A-weighted sound pressure level (dBA SPL). A 2 × 3 repeated-measures ANOVA was used to determine the significance of the main and interaction effects. USLLs increased in the presence of background noise, regardless of the measurement approach used. However, the listening levels estimated by the participants using the survey and self-report field measure were significantly lower than those recorded using in-ear laboratory measurements by 9.6 and 3.3 dBA respectively. In-ear laboratory measures yielded the highest listening levels. Higher listening levels were observed in the presence of background noise for all measurement approaches. It appears that subjects' survey responses underestimate true listening levels in comparison to self-report calibrated field measures, and that both underestimate listening levels measured in the laboratory setting. More research in this area is warranted to determine whether measurement techniques can be refined and adjusted to accurately reflect real-world listening preferences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4630944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher PAGEPress Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46309442015-11-09 Listening levels of teenage iPod users: does measurement approach matter? Haines, Nicole C. Hodgetts, William E. Ostevik, Amberley V. Rieger, Jana M. Audiol Res Article The main objective of this study was to determine the influence of background noise levels and measurement approach on user-selected listening levels (USLLs) chosen by teenaged MP3 player users. It was hypothesized that the presence of background noise would (i) increase the USLL across all measurement approaches, (ii) result in no significant USLL differences between survey reports, objective lab measures or calibrated self-report field measures, and (iii) cause no interaction effect between level of background noise and measurement approach. There were two independent variables in this study: the level of background noise and measurement approach. The first independent variable, level of background noise, had two levels: quiet and transportation noise. The second independent variable, measurement approach, had three levels: survey, objective in-ear lab measurement and calibrated self-report field measurement. The dependent variable was ear canal A-weighted sound pressure level (dBA SPL). A 2 × 3 repeated-measures ANOVA was used to determine the significance of the main and interaction effects. USLLs increased in the presence of background noise, regardless of the measurement approach used. However, the listening levels estimated by the participants using the survey and self-report field measure were significantly lower than those recorded using in-ear laboratory measurements by 9.6 and 3.3 dBA respectively. In-ear laboratory measures yielded the highest listening levels. Higher listening levels were observed in the presence of background noise for all measurement approaches. It appears that subjects' survey responses underestimate true listening levels in comparison to self-report calibrated field measures, and that both underestimate listening levels measured in the laboratory setting. More research in this area is warranted to determine whether measurement techniques can be refined and adjusted to accurately reflect real-world listening preferences. PAGEPress Publications 2012-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4630944/ /pubmed/26557335 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e6 Text en ©Copyright N.C. Haines et al., 2012 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Licensee PAGEPress, Italy
spellingShingle Article
Haines, Nicole C.
Hodgetts, William E.
Ostevik, Amberley V.
Rieger, Jana M.
Listening levels of teenage iPod users: does measurement approach matter?
title Listening levels of teenage iPod users: does measurement approach matter?
title_full Listening levels of teenage iPod users: does measurement approach matter?
title_fullStr Listening levels of teenage iPod users: does measurement approach matter?
title_full_unstemmed Listening levels of teenage iPod users: does measurement approach matter?
title_short Listening levels of teenage iPod users: does measurement approach matter?
title_sort listening levels of teenage ipod users: does measurement approach matter?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557335
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e6
work_keys_str_mv AT hainesnicolec listeninglevelsofteenageipodusersdoesmeasurementapproachmatter
AT hodgettswilliame listeninglevelsofteenageipodusersdoesmeasurementapproachmatter
AT ostevikamberleyv listeninglevelsofteenageipodusersdoesmeasurementapproachmatter
AT riegerjanam listeninglevelsofteenageipodusersdoesmeasurementapproachmatter