Cargando…
Algorithm based patient care protocol to optimize patient care and inpatient stay in head and neck free flap patients
OBJECTIVE: To determine if rigid adherence (where medically appropriate) to an algorithm/checklist-based patient care pathway can reduce the duration of hospitalization and complication rates in patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction with free tissue transfer. METHODS: Study design was a r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26525293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-015-0090-6 |
_version_ | 1782398810070188032 |
---|---|
author | O’Connell, Daniel A. Barber, Brittany Klein, Max F. Soparlo, Jeff Al-Marzouki, Hani Harris, Jeffrey R. Seikaly, Hadi |
author_facet | O’Connell, Daniel A. Barber, Brittany Klein, Max F. Soparlo, Jeff Al-Marzouki, Hani Harris, Jeffrey R. Seikaly, Hadi |
author_sort | O’Connell, Daniel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine if rigid adherence (where medically appropriate) to an algorithm/checklist-based patient care pathway can reduce the duration of hospitalization and complication rates in patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction with free tissue transfer. METHODS: Study design was a retrospective case-control study of patients undergoing major head and neck cancer resections and reconstruction at a tertiary referral centre. The intervention was rigid adherence to a pre-existing care pathway including flow algorithms and multidisciplinary checklists incorporated into patient charting and care orders. 157 patients were enrolled prospectively and were compared to 99 patients in a historical cohort. Patient charts were reviewed and information related to the patient, procedure, and post-operative course was extracted. The two groups were compared for number of major and minor complications (using the Clavien-Dindo system) and length of stay in hospital. RESULTS: Comparing pre- and post-intervention groups, no significant difference was identified in duration of hospital stay (21.5 days vs. 20.5 days, p = 0.750), the rate of major complications was significantly higher in the pre-intervention cohort (25.3 % vs. 14.0 %, p = 0.031), the rate of minor complications was not significantly higher (34.3 % vs 30.8 %, p = 0.610). CONCLUSION: Rigid adherence to our patient care pathway, and improved charting techniques including flow algorithms and multidisciplinary checklists has improved patient care by showing a significant reduction in the rate of major complications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40463-015-0090-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4631082 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46310822015-11-04 Algorithm based patient care protocol to optimize patient care and inpatient stay in head and neck free flap patients O’Connell, Daniel A. Barber, Brittany Klein, Max F. Soparlo, Jeff Al-Marzouki, Hani Harris, Jeffrey R. Seikaly, Hadi J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: To determine if rigid adherence (where medically appropriate) to an algorithm/checklist-based patient care pathway can reduce the duration of hospitalization and complication rates in patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction with free tissue transfer. METHODS: Study design was a retrospective case-control study of patients undergoing major head and neck cancer resections and reconstruction at a tertiary referral centre. The intervention was rigid adherence to a pre-existing care pathway including flow algorithms and multidisciplinary checklists incorporated into patient charting and care orders. 157 patients were enrolled prospectively and were compared to 99 patients in a historical cohort. Patient charts were reviewed and information related to the patient, procedure, and post-operative course was extracted. The two groups were compared for number of major and minor complications (using the Clavien-Dindo system) and length of stay in hospital. RESULTS: Comparing pre- and post-intervention groups, no significant difference was identified in duration of hospital stay (21.5 days vs. 20.5 days, p = 0.750), the rate of major complications was significantly higher in the pre-intervention cohort (25.3 % vs. 14.0 %, p = 0.031), the rate of minor complications was not significantly higher (34.3 % vs 30.8 %, p = 0.610). CONCLUSION: Rigid adherence to our patient care pathway, and improved charting techniques including flow algorithms and multidisciplinary checklists has improved patient care by showing a significant reduction in the rate of major complications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40463-015-0090-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4631082/ /pubmed/26525293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-015-0090-6 Text en © O’Connell et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article O’Connell, Daniel A. Barber, Brittany Klein, Max F. Soparlo, Jeff Al-Marzouki, Hani Harris, Jeffrey R. Seikaly, Hadi Algorithm based patient care protocol to optimize patient care and inpatient stay in head and neck free flap patients |
title | Algorithm based patient care protocol to optimize patient care and inpatient stay in head and neck free flap patients |
title_full | Algorithm based patient care protocol to optimize patient care and inpatient stay in head and neck free flap patients |
title_fullStr | Algorithm based patient care protocol to optimize patient care and inpatient stay in head and neck free flap patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Algorithm based patient care protocol to optimize patient care and inpatient stay in head and neck free flap patients |
title_short | Algorithm based patient care protocol to optimize patient care and inpatient stay in head and neck free flap patients |
title_sort | algorithm based patient care protocol to optimize patient care and inpatient stay in head and neck free flap patients |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26525293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-015-0090-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oconnelldaniela algorithmbasedpatientcareprotocoltooptimizepatientcareandinpatientstayinheadandneckfreeflappatients AT barberbrittany algorithmbasedpatientcareprotocoltooptimizepatientcareandinpatientstayinheadandneckfreeflappatients AT kleinmaxf algorithmbasedpatientcareprotocoltooptimizepatientcareandinpatientstayinheadandneckfreeflappatients AT soparlojeff algorithmbasedpatientcareprotocoltooptimizepatientcareandinpatientstayinheadandneckfreeflappatients AT almarzoukihani algorithmbasedpatientcareprotocoltooptimizepatientcareandinpatientstayinheadandneckfreeflappatients AT harrisjeffreyr algorithmbasedpatientcareprotocoltooptimizepatientcareandinpatientstayinheadandneckfreeflappatients AT seikalyhadi algorithmbasedpatientcareprotocoltooptimizepatientcareandinpatientstayinheadandneckfreeflappatients |