Cargando…

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndromes: clinical evidence, tips and tricks

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent (DES) is routine treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, permanent metallic caging of the vessel has several shortcomings, such as side branch jailing and impossibility of late lumen enlargement. Moreover...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giacchi, Giuseppe, Ortega-Paz, Luis, Brugaletta, Salvatore, Ishida, Kohki, Sabaté, Manel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677353
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pwki.2015.54006
_version_ 1782398891820318720
author Giacchi, Giuseppe
Ortega-Paz, Luis
Brugaletta, Salvatore
Ishida, Kohki
Sabaté, Manel
author_facet Giacchi, Giuseppe
Ortega-Paz, Luis
Brugaletta, Salvatore
Ishida, Kohki
Sabaté, Manel
author_sort Giacchi, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent (DES) is routine treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, permanent metallic caging of the vessel has several shortcomings, such as side branch jailing and impossibility of late lumen enlargement. Moreover, DES PCI is affected by vasomotion impairment. In ACS a high thrombus burden and vasospasm lead to a higher risk of acute and late acquired stent malapposition than in stable patients. This increases the risk of acute, late and very late stent thrombosis. In this challenging clinical setting, the implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) could represent an appealing therapeutic option. Temporary vessel scaffolding has proved to have several advantages over metallic stent delivery, such as framework reabsorption, late lumen enlargement, side branch patency, and recovery of physiological reactivity to vasoactive stimuli. In the thrombotic environment of ACS, BVS implantation has the benefit of capping the thrombus and the vulnerable plaque. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds also seems to reduce the incidence of angina during follow-up. Acute coronary syndromes patients may therefore benefit more from temporary polymeric caging than from permanent stent platform implantation. The aim of this review is to update the available knowledge concerning the use of BVS in ACS patients, by analyzing the potential pitfalls in this challenging clinical setting and presenting tricks to overcome these limitations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4631727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46317272015-12-16 Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndromes: clinical evidence, tips and tricks Giacchi, Giuseppe Ortega-Paz, Luis Brugaletta, Salvatore Ishida, Kohki Sabaté, Manel Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej Review Paper Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent (DES) is routine treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, permanent metallic caging of the vessel has several shortcomings, such as side branch jailing and impossibility of late lumen enlargement. Moreover, DES PCI is affected by vasomotion impairment. In ACS a high thrombus burden and vasospasm lead to a higher risk of acute and late acquired stent malapposition than in stable patients. This increases the risk of acute, late and very late stent thrombosis. In this challenging clinical setting, the implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) could represent an appealing therapeutic option. Temporary vessel scaffolding has proved to have several advantages over metallic stent delivery, such as framework reabsorption, late lumen enlargement, side branch patency, and recovery of physiological reactivity to vasoactive stimuli. In the thrombotic environment of ACS, BVS implantation has the benefit of capping the thrombus and the vulnerable plaque. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds also seems to reduce the incidence of angina during follow-up. Acute coronary syndromes patients may therefore benefit more from temporary polymeric caging than from permanent stent platform implantation. The aim of this review is to update the available knowledge concerning the use of BVS in ACS patients, by analyzing the potential pitfalls in this challenging clinical setting and presenting tricks to overcome these limitations. Termedia Publishing House 2015-09-28 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4631727/ /pubmed/26677353 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pwki.2015.54006 Text en Copyright © 2015 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Giacchi, Giuseppe
Ortega-Paz, Luis
Brugaletta, Salvatore
Ishida, Kohki
Sabaté, Manel
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndromes: clinical evidence, tips and tricks
title Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndromes: clinical evidence, tips and tricks
title_full Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndromes: clinical evidence, tips and tricks
title_fullStr Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndromes: clinical evidence, tips and tricks
title_full_unstemmed Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndromes: clinical evidence, tips and tricks
title_short Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndromes: clinical evidence, tips and tricks
title_sort bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndromes: clinical evidence, tips and tricks
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677353
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pwki.2015.54006
work_keys_str_mv AT giacchigiuseppe bioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationinacutecoronarysyndromesclinicalevidencetipsandtricks
AT ortegapazluis bioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationinacutecoronarysyndromesclinicalevidencetipsandtricks
AT brugalettasalvatore bioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationinacutecoronarysyndromesclinicalevidencetipsandtricks
AT ishidakohki bioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationinacutecoronarysyndromesclinicalevidencetipsandtricks
AT sabatemanel bioresorbablevascularscaffoldimplantationinacutecoronarysyndromesclinicalevidencetipsandtricks