Cargando…

The Consequences of Replicating in the Wrong Orientation: Bacterial Chromosome Duplication without an Active Replication Origin

Chromosome replication is regulated in all organisms at the assembly stage of the replication machinery at specific origins. In Escherichia coli, the DnaA initiator protein regulates the assembly of replication forks at oriC. This regulation can be undermined by defects in nucleic acid metabolism. I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dimude, Juachi U., Stockum, Anna, Midgley-Smith, Sarah L., Upton, Amy L., Foster, Helen A., Khan, Arshad, Saunders, Nigel J., Retkute, Renata, Rudolph, Christian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Microbiology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26530381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01294-15
_version_ 1782398902650011648
author Dimude, Juachi U.
Stockum, Anna
Midgley-Smith, Sarah L.
Upton, Amy L.
Foster, Helen A.
Khan, Arshad
Saunders, Nigel J.
Retkute, Renata
Rudolph, Christian J.
author_facet Dimude, Juachi U.
Stockum, Anna
Midgley-Smith, Sarah L.
Upton, Amy L.
Foster, Helen A.
Khan, Arshad
Saunders, Nigel J.
Retkute, Renata
Rudolph, Christian J.
author_sort Dimude, Juachi U.
collection PubMed
description Chromosome replication is regulated in all organisms at the assembly stage of the replication machinery at specific origins. In Escherichia coli, the DnaA initiator protein regulates the assembly of replication forks at oriC. This regulation can be undermined by defects in nucleic acid metabolism. In cells lacking RNase HI, replication initiates independently of DnaA and oriC, presumably at persisting R-loops. A similar mechanism was assumed for origin-independent synthesis in cells lacking RecG. However, recently we suggested that this synthesis initiates at intermediates resulting from replication fork fusions. Here we present data suggesting that in cells lacking RecG or RNase HI, origin-independent synthesis arises by different mechanisms, indicative of these two proteins having different roles in vivo. Our data support the idea that RNase HI processes R-loops, while RecG is required to process replication fork fusion intermediates. However, regardless of how origin-independent synthesis is initiated, a fraction of forks will proceed in an orientation opposite to normal. We show that the resulting head-on encounters with transcription threaten cell viability, especially if taking place in highly transcribed areas. Thus, despite their different functions, RecG and RNase HI are both important factors for maintaining replication control and orientation. Their absence causes severe replication problems, highlighting the advantages of the normal chromosome arrangement, which exploits a single origin to control the number of forks and their orientation relative to transcription, and a defined termination area to contain fork fusions. Any changes to this arrangement endanger cell cycle control, chromosome dynamics, and, ultimately, cell viability. Importance Cell division requires unwinding of millions of DNA base pairs to generate the template for RNA transcripts as well as chromosome replication. As both processes use the same template, frequent clashes are unavoidable. To minimize the impact of these clashes, transcription and replication in bacteria follow the same directionality, thereby avoiding head-on collisions. This codirectionality is maintained by a strict regulation of where replication is started. We have used Escherichia coli as a model to investigate cells in which the defined location of replication initiation is compromised. In cells lacking either RNase HI or RecG, replication initiates away from the defined replication origin, and we discuss the different mechanisms by which this synthesis arises. In addition, the resulting forks proceed in a direction opposite to normal, thereby inducing head-on collisions between transcription and replication, and we show that the resulting consequences are severe enough to threaten the viability of cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4631800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher American Society of Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46318002015-11-05 The Consequences of Replicating in the Wrong Orientation: Bacterial Chromosome Duplication without an Active Replication Origin Dimude, Juachi U. Stockum, Anna Midgley-Smith, Sarah L. Upton, Amy L. Foster, Helen A. Khan, Arshad Saunders, Nigel J. Retkute, Renata Rudolph, Christian J. mBio Research Article Chromosome replication is regulated in all organisms at the assembly stage of the replication machinery at specific origins. In Escherichia coli, the DnaA initiator protein regulates the assembly of replication forks at oriC. This regulation can be undermined by defects in nucleic acid metabolism. In cells lacking RNase HI, replication initiates independently of DnaA and oriC, presumably at persisting R-loops. A similar mechanism was assumed for origin-independent synthesis in cells lacking RecG. However, recently we suggested that this synthesis initiates at intermediates resulting from replication fork fusions. Here we present data suggesting that in cells lacking RecG or RNase HI, origin-independent synthesis arises by different mechanisms, indicative of these two proteins having different roles in vivo. Our data support the idea that RNase HI processes R-loops, while RecG is required to process replication fork fusion intermediates. However, regardless of how origin-independent synthesis is initiated, a fraction of forks will proceed in an orientation opposite to normal. We show that the resulting head-on encounters with transcription threaten cell viability, especially if taking place in highly transcribed areas. Thus, despite their different functions, RecG and RNase HI are both important factors for maintaining replication control and orientation. Their absence causes severe replication problems, highlighting the advantages of the normal chromosome arrangement, which exploits a single origin to control the number of forks and their orientation relative to transcription, and a defined termination area to contain fork fusions. Any changes to this arrangement endanger cell cycle control, chromosome dynamics, and, ultimately, cell viability. Importance Cell division requires unwinding of millions of DNA base pairs to generate the template for RNA transcripts as well as chromosome replication. As both processes use the same template, frequent clashes are unavoidable. To minimize the impact of these clashes, transcription and replication in bacteria follow the same directionality, thereby avoiding head-on collisions. This codirectionality is maintained by a strict regulation of where replication is started. We have used Escherichia coli as a model to investigate cells in which the defined location of replication initiation is compromised. In cells lacking either RNase HI or RecG, replication initiates away from the defined replication origin, and we discuss the different mechanisms by which this synthesis arises. In addition, the resulting forks proceed in a direction opposite to normal, thereby inducing head-on collisions between transcription and replication, and we show that the resulting consequences are severe enough to threaten the viability of cells. American Society of Microbiology 2015-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4631800/ /pubmed/26530381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01294-15 Text en Copyright © 2015 Dimude et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Dimude, Juachi U.
Stockum, Anna
Midgley-Smith, Sarah L.
Upton, Amy L.
Foster, Helen A.
Khan, Arshad
Saunders, Nigel J.
Retkute, Renata
Rudolph, Christian J.
The Consequences of Replicating in the Wrong Orientation: Bacterial Chromosome Duplication without an Active Replication Origin
title The Consequences of Replicating in the Wrong Orientation: Bacterial Chromosome Duplication without an Active Replication Origin
title_full The Consequences of Replicating in the Wrong Orientation: Bacterial Chromosome Duplication without an Active Replication Origin
title_fullStr The Consequences of Replicating in the Wrong Orientation: Bacterial Chromosome Duplication without an Active Replication Origin
title_full_unstemmed The Consequences of Replicating in the Wrong Orientation: Bacterial Chromosome Duplication without an Active Replication Origin
title_short The Consequences of Replicating in the Wrong Orientation: Bacterial Chromosome Duplication without an Active Replication Origin
title_sort consequences of replicating in the wrong orientation: bacterial chromosome duplication without an active replication origin
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26530381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01294-15
work_keys_str_mv AT dimudejuachiu theconsequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT stockumanna theconsequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT midgleysmithsarahl theconsequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT uptonamyl theconsequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT fosterhelena theconsequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT khanarshad theconsequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT saundersnigelj theconsequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT retkuterenata theconsequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT rudolphchristianj theconsequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT dimudejuachiu consequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT stockumanna consequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT midgleysmithsarahl consequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT uptonamyl consequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT fosterhelena consequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT khanarshad consequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT saundersnigelj consequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT retkuterenata consequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin
AT rudolphchristianj consequencesofreplicatinginthewrongorientationbacterialchromosomeduplicationwithoutanactivereplicationorigin