Cargando…

Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them

Objectives. To review the available literature describing the three most common approaches for buccal mucosal graft (BMG) augmentation during reconstruction of bulbar urethral strictures. Due to its excellent histological properties, buccal mucosa graft is now routinely used in urethral reconstructi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Venkatesan, Krishnan, Blakely, Stephen, Nikolavsky, Dmitriy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26576149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/397936
_version_ 1782398912368214016
author Venkatesan, Krishnan
Blakely, Stephen
Nikolavsky, Dmitriy
author_facet Venkatesan, Krishnan
Blakely, Stephen
Nikolavsky, Dmitriy
author_sort Venkatesan, Krishnan
collection PubMed
description Objectives. To review the available literature describing the three most common approaches for buccal mucosal graft (BMG) augmentation during reconstruction of bulbar urethral strictures. Due to its excellent histological properties, buccal mucosa graft is now routinely used in urethral reconstruction. The best approach for the placement of such a graft remains controversial. Methods. PubMed search was conducted for available English literature describing outcomes of bulbar urethroplasty augmentation techniques using dorsal, ventral, and lateral approaches. Prospective and retrospective studies as well as meta-analyses and latest systematic reviews were included. Results. Most of the studies reviewed are of retrospective nature and majority described dorsal or ventral approaches. Medium- and long-term outcomes of all three approaches were comparable ranging between 80 and 88%. Conclusion. Various techniques of BMG augmentation urethroplasty have been described for repairs of bulbar urethral strictures. In this review, we describe and compare the three most common “competing” approaches for bulbar urethroplasty with utilization of BMG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4631846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46318462015-11-16 Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them Venkatesan, Krishnan Blakely, Stephen Nikolavsky, Dmitriy Adv Urol Review Article Objectives. To review the available literature describing the three most common approaches for buccal mucosal graft (BMG) augmentation during reconstruction of bulbar urethral strictures. Due to its excellent histological properties, buccal mucosa graft is now routinely used in urethral reconstruction. The best approach for the placement of such a graft remains controversial. Methods. PubMed search was conducted for available English literature describing outcomes of bulbar urethroplasty augmentation techniques using dorsal, ventral, and lateral approaches. Prospective and retrospective studies as well as meta-analyses and latest systematic reviews were included. Results. Most of the studies reviewed are of retrospective nature and majority described dorsal or ventral approaches. Medium- and long-term outcomes of all three approaches were comparable ranging between 80 and 88%. Conclusion. Various techniques of BMG augmentation urethroplasty have been described for repairs of bulbar urethral strictures. In this review, we describe and compare the three most common “competing” approaches for bulbar urethroplasty with utilization of BMG. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4631846/ /pubmed/26576149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/397936 Text en Copyright © 2015 Krishnan Venkatesan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Venkatesan, Krishnan
Blakely, Stephen
Nikolavsky, Dmitriy
Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them
title Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them
title_full Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them
title_fullStr Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them
title_short Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them
title_sort surgical repair of bulbar urethral strictures: advantages of ventral, dorsal, and lateral approaches and when to choose them
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26576149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/397936
work_keys_str_mv AT venkatesankrishnan surgicalrepairofbulbarurethralstricturesadvantagesofventraldorsalandlateralapproachesandwhentochoosethem
AT blakelystephen surgicalrepairofbulbarurethralstricturesadvantagesofventraldorsalandlateralapproachesandwhentochoosethem
AT nikolavskydmitriy surgicalrepairofbulbarurethralstricturesadvantagesofventraldorsalandlateralapproachesandwhentochoosethem