Cargando…
Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them
Objectives. To review the available literature describing the three most common approaches for buccal mucosal graft (BMG) augmentation during reconstruction of bulbar urethral strictures. Due to its excellent histological properties, buccal mucosa graft is now routinely used in urethral reconstructi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26576149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/397936 |
_version_ | 1782398912368214016 |
---|---|
author | Venkatesan, Krishnan Blakely, Stephen Nikolavsky, Dmitriy |
author_facet | Venkatesan, Krishnan Blakely, Stephen Nikolavsky, Dmitriy |
author_sort | Venkatesan, Krishnan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives. To review the available literature describing the three most common approaches for buccal mucosal graft (BMG) augmentation during reconstruction of bulbar urethral strictures. Due to its excellent histological properties, buccal mucosa graft is now routinely used in urethral reconstruction. The best approach for the placement of such a graft remains controversial. Methods. PubMed search was conducted for available English literature describing outcomes of bulbar urethroplasty augmentation techniques using dorsal, ventral, and lateral approaches. Prospective and retrospective studies as well as meta-analyses and latest systematic reviews were included. Results. Most of the studies reviewed are of retrospective nature and majority described dorsal or ventral approaches. Medium- and long-term outcomes of all three approaches were comparable ranging between 80 and 88%. Conclusion. Various techniques of BMG augmentation urethroplasty have been described for repairs of bulbar urethral strictures. In this review, we describe and compare the three most common “competing” approaches for bulbar urethroplasty with utilization of BMG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4631846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46318462015-11-16 Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them Venkatesan, Krishnan Blakely, Stephen Nikolavsky, Dmitriy Adv Urol Review Article Objectives. To review the available literature describing the three most common approaches for buccal mucosal graft (BMG) augmentation during reconstruction of bulbar urethral strictures. Due to its excellent histological properties, buccal mucosa graft is now routinely used in urethral reconstruction. The best approach for the placement of such a graft remains controversial. Methods. PubMed search was conducted for available English literature describing outcomes of bulbar urethroplasty augmentation techniques using dorsal, ventral, and lateral approaches. Prospective and retrospective studies as well as meta-analyses and latest systematic reviews were included. Results. Most of the studies reviewed are of retrospective nature and majority described dorsal or ventral approaches. Medium- and long-term outcomes of all three approaches were comparable ranging between 80 and 88%. Conclusion. Various techniques of BMG augmentation urethroplasty have been described for repairs of bulbar urethral strictures. In this review, we describe and compare the three most common “competing” approaches for bulbar urethroplasty with utilization of BMG. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4631846/ /pubmed/26576149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/397936 Text en Copyright © 2015 Krishnan Venkatesan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Venkatesan, Krishnan Blakely, Stephen Nikolavsky, Dmitriy Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them |
title | Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them |
title_full | Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them |
title_fullStr | Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them |
title_short | Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them |
title_sort | surgical repair of bulbar urethral strictures: advantages of ventral, dorsal, and lateral approaches and when to choose them |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26576149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/397936 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT venkatesankrishnan surgicalrepairofbulbarurethralstricturesadvantagesofventraldorsalandlateralapproachesandwhentochoosethem AT blakelystephen surgicalrepairofbulbarurethralstricturesadvantagesofventraldorsalandlateralapproachesandwhentochoosethem AT nikolavskydmitriy surgicalrepairofbulbarurethralstricturesadvantagesofventraldorsalandlateralapproachesandwhentochoosethem |