Cargando…
NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass
BACKGROUND: Overeating different dietary fatty acids influence the amount of liver fat stored during weight gain, however, the mechanisms responsible are unclear. We aimed to identify non-lipid metabolites that may differentiate between saturated (SFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) overfeedi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26479316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2015.31 |
_version_ | 1782398931814055936 |
---|---|
author | Elmsjö, A Rosqvist, F Engskog, M K R Haglöf, J Kullberg, J Iggman, D Johansson, L Ahlström, H Arvidsson, T Risérus, U Pettersson, C |
author_facet | Elmsjö, A Rosqvist, F Engskog, M K R Haglöf, J Kullberg, J Iggman, D Johansson, L Ahlström, H Arvidsson, T Risérus, U Pettersson, C |
author_sort | Elmsjö, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Overeating different dietary fatty acids influence the amount of liver fat stored during weight gain, however, the mechanisms responsible are unclear. We aimed to identify non-lipid metabolites that may differentiate between saturated (SFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) overfeeding using a non-targeted metabolomic approach. We also investigated the possible relationships between plasma metabolites and body fat accumulation. METHODS: In a randomized study (LIPOGAIN study), n=39 healthy individuals were overfed with muffins containing SFA or PUFA. Plasma samples were precipitated with cold acetonitrile and analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Pattern recognition techniques were used to overview the data, identify variables contributing to group classification and to correlate metabolites with fat accumulation. RESULTS: We previously reported that SFA causes a greater accumulation of liver fat, visceral fat and total body fat, whereas lean tissue levels increases less compared with PUFA, despite comparable weight gain. In this study, lactate and acetate were identified as important contributors to group classification between SFA and PUFA (P<0.05). Furthermore, the fat depots (total body fat, visceral adipose tissue and liver fat) and lean tissue correlated (P(corr)>0.5) all with two or more metabolites (for example, branched amino acids, alanine, acetate and lactate). The metabolite composition differed in a manner that may indicate higher insulin sensitivity after a diet with PUFA compared with SFA, but this needs to be confirmed in future studies. CONCLUSION: A non-lipid metabolic profiling approach only identified a few metabolites that differentiated between SFA and PUFA overfeeding. Whether these metabolite changes are involved in depot-specific fat storage and increased lean tissue mass during overeating needs further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4631933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46319332015-11-05 NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass Elmsjö, A Rosqvist, F Engskog, M K R Haglöf, J Kullberg, J Iggman, D Johansson, L Ahlström, H Arvidsson, T Risérus, U Pettersson, C Nutr Diabetes Original Article BACKGROUND: Overeating different dietary fatty acids influence the amount of liver fat stored during weight gain, however, the mechanisms responsible are unclear. We aimed to identify non-lipid metabolites that may differentiate between saturated (SFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) overfeeding using a non-targeted metabolomic approach. We also investigated the possible relationships between plasma metabolites and body fat accumulation. METHODS: In a randomized study (LIPOGAIN study), n=39 healthy individuals were overfed with muffins containing SFA or PUFA. Plasma samples were precipitated with cold acetonitrile and analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Pattern recognition techniques were used to overview the data, identify variables contributing to group classification and to correlate metabolites with fat accumulation. RESULTS: We previously reported that SFA causes a greater accumulation of liver fat, visceral fat and total body fat, whereas lean tissue levels increases less compared with PUFA, despite comparable weight gain. In this study, lactate and acetate were identified as important contributors to group classification between SFA and PUFA (P<0.05). Furthermore, the fat depots (total body fat, visceral adipose tissue and liver fat) and lean tissue correlated (P(corr)>0.5) all with two or more metabolites (for example, branched amino acids, alanine, acetate and lactate). The metabolite composition differed in a manner that may indicate higher insulin sensitivity after a diet with PUFA compared with SFA, but this needs to be confirmed in future studies. CONCLUSION: A non-lipid metabolic profiling approach only identified a few metabolites that differentiated between SFA and PUFA overfeeding. Whether these metabolite changes are involved in depot-specific fat storage and increased lean tissue mass during overeating needs further investigation. Nature Publishing Group 2015-10 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4631933/ /pubmed/26479316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2015.31 Text en Copyright © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Elmsjö, A Rosqvist, F Engskog, M K R Haglöf, J Kullberg, J Iggman, D Johansson, L Ahlström, H Arvidsson, T Risérus, U Pettersson, C NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass |
title | NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass |
title_full | NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass |
title_fullStr | NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass |
title_full_unstemmed | NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass |
title_short | NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass |
title_sort | nmr-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26479316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2015.31 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elmsjoa nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass AT rosqvistf nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass AT engskogmkr nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass AT haglofj nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass AT kullbergj nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass AT iggmand nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass AT johanssonl nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass AT ahlstromh nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass AT arvidssont nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass AT riserusu nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass AT petterssonc nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass |