Cargando…

NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass

BACKGROUND: Overeating different dietary fatty acids influence the amount of liver fat stored during weight gain, however, the mechanisms responsible are unclear. We aimed to identify non-lipid metabolites that may differentiate between saturated (SFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) overfeedi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elmsjö, A, Rosqvist, F, Engskog, M K R, Haglöf, J, Kullberg, J, Iggman, D, Johansson, L, Ahlström, H, Arvidsson, T, Risérus, U, Pettersson, C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26479316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2015.31
_version_ 1782398931814055936
author Elmsjö, A
Rosqvist, F
Engskog, M K R
Haglöf, J
Kullberg, J
Iggman, D
Johansson, L
Ahlström, H
Arvidsson, T
Risérus, U
Pettersson, C
author_facet Elmsjö, A
Rosqvist, F
Engskog, M K R
Haglöf, J
Kullberg, J
Iggman, D
Johansson, L
Ahlström, H
Arvidsson, T
Risérus, U
Pettersson, C
author_sort Elmsjö, A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Overeating different dietary fatty acids influence the amount of liver fat stored during weight gain, however, the mechanisms responsible are unclear. We aimed to identify non-lipid metabolites that may differentiate between saturated (SFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) overfeeding using a non-targeted metabolomic approach. We also investigated the possible relationships between plasma metabolites and body fat accumulation. METHODS: In a randomized study (LIPOGAIN study), n=39 healthy individuals were overfed with muffins containing SFA or PUFA. Plasma samples were precipitated with cold acetonitrile and analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Pattern recognition techniques were used to overview the data, identify variables contributing to group classification and to correlate metabolites with fat accumulation. RESULTS: We previously reported that SFA causes a greater accumulation of liver fat, visceral fat and total body fat, whereas lean tissue levels increases less compared with PUFA, despite comparable weight gain. In this study, lactate and acetate were identified as important contributors to group classification between SFA and PUFA (P<0.05). Furthermore, the fat depots (total body fat, visceral adipose tissue and liver fat) and lean tissue correlated (P(corr)>0.5) all with two or more metabolites (for example, branched amino acids, alanine, acetate and lactate). The metabolite composition differed in a manner that may indicate higher insulin sensitivity after a diet with PUFA compared with SFA, but this needs to be confirmed in future studies. CONCLUSION: A non-lipid metabolic profiling approach only identified a few metabolites that differentiated between SFA and PUFA overfeeding. Whether these metabolite changes are involved in depot-specific fat storage and increased lean tissue mass during overeating needs further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4631933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46319332015-11-05 NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass Elmsjö, A Rosqvist, F Engskog, M K R Haglöf, J Kullberg, J Iggman, D Johansson, L Ahlström, H Arvidsson, T Risérus, U Pettersson, C Nutr Diabetes Original Article BACKGROUND: Overeating different dietary fatty acids influence the amount of liver fat stored during weight gain, however, the mechanisms responsible are unclear. We aimed to identify non-lipid metabolites that may differentiate between saturated (SFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) overfeeding using a non-targeted metabolomic approach. We also investigated the possible relationships between plasma metabolites and body fat accumulation. METHODS: In a randomized study (LIPOGAIN study), n=39 healthy individuals were overfed with muffins containing SFA or PUFA. Plasma samples were precipitated with cold acetonitrile and analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Pattern recognition techniques were used to overview the data, identify variables contributing to group classification and to correlate metabolites with fat accumulation. RESULTS: We previously reported that SFA causes a greater accumulation of liver fat, visceral fat and total body fat, whereas lean tissue levels increases less compared with PUFA, despite comparable weight gain. In this study, lactate and acetate were identified as important contributors to group classification between SFA and PUFA (P<0.05). Furthermore, the fat depots (total body fat, visceral adipose tissue and liver fat) and lean tissue correlated (P(corr)>0.5) all with two or more metabolites (for example, branched amino acids, alanine, acetate and lactate). The metabolite composition differed in a manner that may indicate higher insulin sensitivity after a diet with PUFA compared with SFA, but this needs to be confirmed in future studies. CONCLUSION: A non-lipid metabolic profiling approach only identified a few metabolites that differentiated between SFA and PUFA overfeeding. Whether these metabolite changes are involved in depot-specific fat storage and increased lean tissue mass during overeating needs further investigation. Nature Publishing Group 2015-10 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4631933/ /pubmed/26479316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2015.31 Text en Copyright © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Elmsjö, A
Rosqvist, F
Engskog, M K R
Haglöf, J
Kullberg, J
Iggman, D
Johansson, L
Ahlström, H
Arvidsson, T
Risérus, U
Pettersson, C
NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass
title NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass
title_full NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass
title_fullStr NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass
title_full_unstemmed NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass
title_short NMR-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass
title_sort nmr-based metabolic profiling in healthy individuals overfed different types of fat: links to changes in liver fat accumulation and lean tissue mass
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26479316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2015.31
work_keys_str_mv AT elmsjoa nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass
AT rosqvistf nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass
AT engskogmkr nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass
AT haglofj nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass
AT kullbergj nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass
AT iggmand nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass
AT johanssonl nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass
AT ahlstromh nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass
AT arvidssont nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass
AT riserusu nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass
AT petterssonc nmrbasedmetabolicprofilinginhealthyindividualsoverfeddifferenttypesoffatlinkstochangesinliverfataccumulationandleantissuemass