Cargando…
Glucocorticoids: bad or safe for the bones?
Until recently, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were treated with monotherapy using conventional drugs such as sulfasalazine, antimalarials, intramuscular gold and methotrexate, which often leads to persistent arthritis, loss of functional capacity and decreased quality of life. The use of h...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000050 |
_version_ | 1782398971592835072 |
---|---|
author | Lems, Willem F |
author_facet | Lems, Willem F |
author_sort | Lems, Willem F |
collection | PubMed |
description | Until recently, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were treated with monotherapy using conventional drugs such as sulfasalazine, antimalarials, intramuscular gold and methotrexate, which often leads to persistent arthritis, loss of functional capacity and decreased quality of life. The use of high-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) and active RA are both associated with generalised bone loss and fractures, while GCs have a strong immunosuppressive effect. With the introduction of very effective tumour-necrosis factor-blockers and other biologics, clinical remission is a realistic target in around half of the early patients with RA; the same appears true for the use of methotrexate with chronic low dose or initially high-dose GCs. With the use of a treat-to-target strategy focusing on clinical remission or low disease activity in early patients with RA, the negative effects of systemic inflammation on bone can be inhibited and local bone loss (in the joints), and generalised bone loss at the spine and hips, can be limited or prevented. Whether this also leads to a reduction in vertebral and non-vertebral fractures remains to be demonstrated. Another issue is, in other systemic rheumatic diseases in which treatment options are smaller and less effective than in RA, local and systemic bone loss may still occur. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4632153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46321532015-11-09 Glucocorticoids: bad or safe for the bones? Lems, Willem F RMD Open Proceedings from OsteoRheumatology 2014 Until recently, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were treated with monotherapy using conventional drugs such as sulfasalazine, antimalarials, intramuscular gold and methotrexate, which often leads to persistent arthritis, loss of functional capacity and decreased quality of life. The use of high-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) and active RA are both associated with generalised bone loss and fractures, while GCs have a strong immunosuppressive effect. With the introduction of very effective tumour-necrosis factor-blockers and other biologics, clinical remission is a realistic target in around half of the early patients with RA; the same appears true for the use of methotrexate with chronic low dose or initially high-dose GCs. With the use of a treat-to-target strategy focusing on clinical remission or low disease activity in early patients with RA, the negative effects of systemic inflammation on bone can be inhibited and local bone loss (in the joints), and generalised bone loss at the spine and hips, can be limited or prevented. Whether this also leads to a reduction in vertebral and non-vertebral fractures remains to be demonstrated. Another issue is, in other systemic rheumatic diseases in which treatment options are smaller and less effective than in RA, local and systemic bone loss may still occur. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4632153/ /pubmed/26557373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000050 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Proceedings from OsteoRheumatology 2014 Lems, Willem F Glucocorticoids: bad or safe for the bones? |
title | Glucocorticoids: bad or safe for the bones? |
title_full | Glucocorticoids: bad or safe for the bones? |
title_fullStr | Glucocorticoids: bad or safe for the bones? |
title_full_unstemmed | Glucocorticoids: bad or safe for the bones? |
title_short | Glucocorticoids: bad or safe for the bones? |
title_sort | glucocorticoids: bad or safe for the bones? |
topic | Proceedings from OsteoRheumatology 2014 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lemswillemf glucocorticoidsbadorsafeforthebones |