Cargando…
Three simple rules to ensure reasonably credible subgroup analyses
The limitations of subgroup analyses are well established—false positives due to multiple comparisons, false negatives due to inadequate power, and limited ability to inform individual treatment decisions because patients have multiple characteristics that vary simultaneously. In this article, we ap...
Autores principales: | Burke, James F, Sussman, Jeremy B, Kent, David M, Hayward, Rodney A |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26537915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5651 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The credibility of subgroup analyses reported in stroke trials is low: A systematic review
por: Ademola, Ayoola, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
An IV for the RCT: using instrumental variables to adjust for treatment contamination in randomised controlled trials
por: Sussman, Jeremy B, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Ensuring Scientific Publishing Credibility in Translational Biomedical Optics
por: Pogue, Brian W.
Publicado: (2019) -
Credibility of subgroup analyses by socioeconomic status in public health intervention evaluations: An underappreciated problem?
por: Inglis, Greig, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Inconsistency between overall and subgroup analyses
por: Wang, Hongyue, et al.
Publicado: (2022)