Cargando…
Evaluation of arch width among Class I normal occlusion, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2, and Class III malocclusion in Indian population
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference between Class I (CI) normal occlusion, Class II division 1 (CIId1) and CII division 2 (CIId2), and Class III (CIII) malocclusion with respect to arch widths, width of the maxillary and mandibular arches, gender dimorphism within groups, a...
Autores principales: | Patel, Dolly, Mehta, Falguni, Patel, Nimesh, Mehta, Nishit, Trivedi, Ipist, Mehta, Apexa |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26604575 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.166842 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of condylar position in normal occlusion, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2 and Class III malocclusions using CBCT imaging
por: Rivero-Millán, Pilar, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Pathognomonic features of Angle's Class II division 2 malocclusion: A comparative cephalometric and arch width study
por: Prasad, Singamsetty E.R.V., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Computed Tomography Evaluation of Craniomandibular Articulation in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion and Class I Normal Occlusion Subjects in North Indian Population
por: Prabhat, K. C., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Evaluation of Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Changes in Patients With Class II Div 1 Malocclusion Treated With Twin Block Appliance
por: Gandhi, Vaibhav, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Treatment of Class II Malocclusion and Impacted Canines with Two-phase Orthodontic Treatment
por: Gandhi, Vaibhav, et al.
Publicado: (2017)