Cargando…

Canine retraction and anchorage loss self-ligating versus conventional brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review is to identify and review the orthodontic literature with regards to assessing possible differences in canine retraction rate and the amount of antero-posterior anchorage (AP) loss during maxillary canine retraction, using conventional brackets (CBs)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Zhou, Qiaozhen, ul Haq, Abdul Azeem Amin, Tian, Liu, Chen, Xiaofeng, Huang, Kui, Zhou, Yu
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2015
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26531223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0127-2

Ejemplares similares

Comparative evaluation of the maxillary canine retraction rate and anchorage loss between two types of self-ligating brackets using sliding mechanics
por: Abu-Shahba, Ramadan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Root resorption of self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets in severe anterior crowding Class I patients: a longitudinal retrospective study
por: Chen, Weiting, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
por: MONTEIRO, Maria Regina Guerra, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of Rate of Canine Retraction and Anchorage Potential between Mini-implant and Conventional Molar Anchorage: An In vivo Study
por: Davis, D, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Torque expression in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets: A systematic review
por: Al-Thomali, Yousef, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Comparison of Frictional Forces Generated by a New Ceramic Bracket with the Conventional Brackets using Unconventional and Conventional Ligation System and the Self-ligating Brackets: An In Vitro Study
por: Pasha, Azam, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Evaluation of the Friction of Self-Ligating and Conventional Bracket Systems
por: Tecco, Simona, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Corrosion behavior of self-ligating and conventional metal brackets
por: Maia, Lúcio Henrique Esmeraldo Gurgel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Rates of tooth movement and bone remodeling activity: Self-ligating versus conventional brackets
por: do Nascimento, Leonard-Euler-Andrade-Gomes, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Stability of treatment with self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in adolescents: a long-term follow-up retrospective study
por: Yu, Zhou, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of temporary anchorage devices and transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction
por: Kecik, Defne
Publicado: (2016)

Self-ligating versus conventional metallic brackets on Streptococcus mutans retention: A systematic review
por: Longoni, Juliano N., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A Comparative Evaluation of Canine Retraction Using Ceramic Bracket and Ceramic Bracket with Metal Slot with Conventional Preadjusted Edgewise Appliance Bracket Systems: A Clinical Study
por: Shaik, Junaid Ahmed, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of self-ligating interactive bracket with conventional preadjusted bracket: A clinical study
por: Jayachandran, Balajee, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Operating time for wire ligation with self‐ligating and conventional brackets: A standardized in vitro study
por: Cattaneo, Paolo M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparative photoelastic study of dental and skeletal anchorages in the canine retraction
por: Claro, Cristiane Aparecida de Assis, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of frictional forces during the closure of extraction spaces in passive self-ligating brackets and conventionally ligated brackets using the finite element method
por: Gómez-Gómez, Sandra-Liliana, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Streptococcus mutans adherence to conventional and self-ligating brackets: an in vitro study
por: FERES, Murilo Fernando Neuppmann, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
por: CASTRO, Raquel Morais, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Evaluation of force released by deflection of orthodontic wires in conventional and self-ligating brackets
por: Higa, Rodrigo Hitoshi, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Microbial colonisation associated with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a systematic review
por: Parmar, Nidhi P, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems’ Kinetic Friction: Conventional and Self-Ligating
por: Vartolomei, Aurel-Claudiu, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems’ Bond Strength: Conventional and Self-Ligating
por: Vartolomei, Aurel-Claudiu, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Oral health-related quality of life in orthodontic patients during initial therapy with conventional brackets or self-ligating brackets
por: Lai, Tai-Ting, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study
por: de Almeida, Marcio Rodrigues, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparative study of torque expression among active and passive self-ligating and conventional brackets
por: Franco, Érika Mendonça Fernandes, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Clinical and Salivary Findings in Patients with Metal and Crystalline Conventional and Self-Ligating Orthodontic Brackets
por: Jurela, Antonija, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

“In Vitro” Study About Variables that Influence in Arch Friction with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets
por: Moyano, Javier, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A clinical comparative study using anchorage from mini-implants and conventional anchorage methods to retract anterior teeth
por: Malhotra, Abhita, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

In vitro evaluation of resistance to sliding in self-ligating and conventional bracket systems during dental alignment
por: Cordasco, Giancarlo, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Alterations in plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation promoted by treatment with self-ligating and conventional orthodontic brackets
por: Cardoso, Mauricio de Almeida, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

From conventional to self-ligating bracket systems: Is it possible to aggregate the experience with the former to the use of the latter?
por: Capistrano, Anderson, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Effectiveness of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices in canine retraction and anchorage preservation during the two-step technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Tian, Haonan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Orthodontic Bracket Manufacturing Tolerances and Dimensional Differences between Select Self-Ligating Brackets
por: Major, Thomas W., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Root resorption, treatment time and extraction rate during orthodontic treatment with self-ligating and conventional brackets
por: Jacobs, Collin, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions
por: Jakob, Sérgio Ricardo, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Evaluation of the force generated by gradual deflection of orthodontic wires in conventional metallic, esthetic, and self-ligating brackets
por: Francisconi, Manoela Fávaro, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine digluconate in self-ligating and conventional metal brackets infected with Streptococcus mutans biofilm
por: Dias, Ana Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets
por: Sfondrini, Maria Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Bacterial adhesion on conventional and self-ligating metallic brackets after surface treatment with plasma-polymerized hexamethyldisiloxane
por: Tupinambá, Rogerio Amaral, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_f5g4muljemu61n79ai6takaoft