Cargando…

Genomic population structure and prevalence of copy number variations in South African Nguni cattle

BACKGROUND: Copy number variations (CNVs) are modifications in DNA structure comprising of deletions, duplications, insertions and complex multi-site variants. Although CNVs are proven to be involved in a variety of phenotypic discrepancies, the full extent and consequence of CNVs is yet to be under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Magretha Diane, Dzama, Kennedy, Hefer, Charles A., Muchadeyi, Farai C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26531252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2122-z
_version_ 1782399006469521408
author Wang, Magretha Diane
Dzama, Kennedy
Hefer, Charles A.
Muchadeyi, Farai C.
author_facet Wang, Magretha Diane
Dzama, Kennedy
Hefer, Charles A.
Muchadeyi, Farai C.
author_sort Wang, Magretha Diane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Copy number variations (CNVs) are modifications in DNA structure comprising of deletions, duplications, insertions and complex multi-site variants. Although CNVs are proven to be involved in a variety of phenotypic discrepancies, the full extent and consequence of CNVs is yet to be understood. To date, no such genomic characterization has been performed in indigenous South African Nguni cattle. Nguni cattle are recognized for their ability to sustain harsh environmental conditions while exhibiting enhanced resistance to disease and parasites and are thought to comprise of up to nine different ecotypes. METHODS: Illumina BovineSNP50 Beadchip data was utilized to investigate genomic population structure and the prevalence of CNVs in 492 South African Nguni cattle. PLINK, ADMIXTURE, R, gPLINK and Haploview software was utilized for quality control, population structure and haplotype block determination. PennCNV hidden Markov model identified CNVs and genes contained within and 10 Mb downstream from reported CNVs. PANTHER and Ensembl databases were subsequently utilized for gene annotation analyses. RESULTS: Population structure analyses on Nguni cattle revealed 5 sub-populations with a possible sub-structure evident at K equal to 8. Four hundred and thirty three CNVs that formed 334 CNVRs ranging from 30 kb to 1 Mb in size are reported. Only 231 of the 492 animals demonstrated CNVRs. Two hundred and eighty nine genes were observed within CNVRs identified. Of these 149, 28, 44, 2 and 14 genes were unique to sub-populations A, B, C, D and E respectively. Gene ontology analyses demonstrated a number of pathways to be represented by respective genes, including immune response, response to abiotic stress and biological regulation processess. CONCLUSIONS: CNVs may explain part of the phenotypic diversity and the enhanced adaptation evident in Nguni cattle. Genes involved in a number of cellular components, biological processes and molecular functions are reported within CNVRs identified. The significance of such CNVRs and the possible effect thereof needs to be ascertained and may hold interesting insight into the functional and adaptive consequence of CNVs in cattle. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2122-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4632335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46323352015-11-04 Genomic population structure and prevalence of copy number variations in South African Nguni cattle Wang, Magretha Diane Dzama, Kennedy Hefer, Charles A. Muchadeyi, Farai C. BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Copy number variations (CNVs) are modifications in DNA structure comprising of deletions, duplications, insertions and complex multi-site variants. Although CNVs are proven to be involved in a variety of phenotypic discrepancies, the full extent and consequence of CNVs is yet to be understood. To date, no such genomic characterization has been performed in indigenous South African Nguni cattle. Nguni cattle are recognized for their ability to sustain harsh environmental conditions while exhibiting enhanced resistance to disease and parasites and are thought to comprise of up to nine different ecotypes. METHODS: Illumina BovineSNP50 Beadchip data was utilized to investigate genomic population structure and the prevalence of CNVs in 492 South African Nguni cattle. PLINK, ADMIXTURE, R, gPLINK and Haploview software was utilized for quality control, population structure and haplotype block determination. PennCNV hidden Markov model identified CNVs and genes contained within and 10 Mb downstream from reported CNVs. PANTHER and Ensembl databases were subsequently utilized for gene annotation analyses. RESULTS: Population structure analyses on Nguni cattle revealed 5 sub-populations with a possible sub-structure evident at K equal to 8. Four hundred and thirty three CNVs that formed 334 CNVRs ranging from 30 kb to 1 Mb in size are reported. Only 231 of the 492 animals demonstrated CNVRs. Two hundred and eighty nine genes were observed within CNVRs identified. Of these 149, 28, 44, 2 and 14 genes were unique to sub-populations A, B, C, D and E respectively. Gene ontology analyses demonstrated a number of pathways to be represented by respective genes, including immune response, response to abiotic stress and biological regulation processess. CONCLUSIONS: CNVs may explain part of the phenotypic diversity and the enhanced adaptation evident in Nguni cattle. Genes involved in a number of cellular components, biological processes and molecular functions are reported within CNVRs identified. The significance of such CNVRs and the possible effect thereof needs to be ascertained and may hold interesting insight into the functional and adaptive consequence of CNVs in cattle. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2122-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4632335/ /pubmed/26531252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2122-z Text en © Wang et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Magretha Diane
Dzama, Kennedy
Hefer, Charles A.
Muchadeyi, Farai C.
Genomic population structure and prevalence of copy number variations in South African Nguni cattle
title Genomic population structure and prevalence of copy number variations in South African Nguni cattle
title_full Genomic population structure and prevalence of copy number variations in South African Nguni cattle
title_fullStr Genomic population structure and prevalence of copy number variations in South African Nguni cattle
title_full_unstemmed Genomic population structure and prevalence of copy number variations in South African Nguni cattle
title_short Genomic population structure and prevalence of copy number variations in South African Nguni cattle
title_sort genomic population structure and prevalence of copy number variations in south african nguni cattle
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26531252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2122-z
work_keys_str_mv AT wangmagrethadiane genomicpopulationstructureandprevalenceofcopynumbervariationsinsouthafricanngunicattle
AT dzamakennedy genomicpopulationstructureandprevalenceofcopynumbervariationsinsouthafricanngunicattle
AT hefercharlesa genomicpopulationstructureandprevalenceofcopynumbervariationsinsouthafricanngunicattle
AT muchadeyifaraic genomicpopulationstructureandprevalenceofcopynumbervariationsinsouthafricanngunicattle