Cargando…

Food Choice and Nutrition: A Social Psychological Perspective

In this Special Issue, entitled “Food choice and Nutrition: A Social Psychological Perspective”, three broad themes have been identified: (1) social and environmental influences on food choice; (2) psychological influences on eating behaviour; and (3) eating behaviour profiling. The studies that add...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hardcastle, Sarah J., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie, Chatzisarantis, Nikos L.D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26665419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7105424
_version_ 1782399032179556352
author Hardcastle, Sarah J.
Thøgersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie
Chatzisarantis, Nikos L.D.
author_facet Hardcastle, Sarah J.
Thøgersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie
Chatzisarantis, Nikos L.D.
author_sort Hardcastle, Sarah J.
collection PubMed
description In this Special Issue, entitled “Food choice and Nutrition: A Social Psychological Perspective”, three broad themes have been identified: (1) social and environmental influences on food choice; (2) psychological influences on eating behaviour; and (3) eating behaviour profiling. The studies that addressed the social and environmental influences indicated that further research would do well to promote positive food choices rather than reduce negative food choices; promote the reading and interpretation of food labels and find ways to effectively market healthy food choices through accessibility, availability and presentation. The studies on psychological influences found that intentions, perceived behavioural control, and confidence were predictors of healthy eating. Given the importance of psychological factors, such as perceived behavioural control and self-efficacy, healthy eating interventions should reduce barriers to healthy eating and foster perceptions of confidence to consume a healthy diet. The final theme focused on the clustering of individuals according to eating behaviour. Some “types” of individuals reported more frequent consumption of fast foods, ready meals or convenience meals or greater levels of disinhibition and less control over food cravings. Intervention designs which make use of multi-level strategies as advocated by the Ecological Model of Behaviour change that proposes multi-level (combining psychological, social and environmental) strategies are likely to be more effective in reaching and engaging individuals susceptible to unhealthy eating habits than interventions operating on a single level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4632444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46324442015-11-30 Food Choice and Nutrition: A Social Psychological Perspective Hardcastle, Sarah J. Thøgersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie Chatzisarantis, Nikos L.D. Nutrients Editorial In this Special Issue, entitled “Food choice and Nutrition: A Social Psychological Perspective”, three broad themes have been identified: (1) social and environmental influences on food choice; (2) psychological influences on eating behaviour; and (3) eating behaviour profiling. The studies that addressed the social and environmental influences indicated that further research would do well to promote positive food choices rather than reduce negative food choices; promote the reading and interpretation of food labels and find ways to effectively market healthy food choices through accessibility, availability and presentation. The studies on psychological influences found that intentions, perceived behavioural control, and confidence were predictors of healthy eating. Given the importance of psychological factors, such as perceived behavioural control and self-efficacy, healthy eating interventions should reduce barriers to healthy eating and foster perceptions of confidence to consume a healthy diet. The final theme focused on the clustering of individuals according to eating behaviour. Some “types” of individuals reported more frequent consumption of fast foods, ready meals or convenience meals or greater levels of disinhibition and less control over food cravings. Intervention designs which make use of multi-level strategies as advocated by the Ecological Model of Behaviour change that proposes multi-level (combining psychological, social and environmental) strategies are likely to be more effective in reaching and engaging individuals susceptible to unhealthy eating habits than interventions operating on a single level. MDPI 2015-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4632444/ /pubmed/26665419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7105424 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Editorial
Hardcastle, Sarah J.
Thøgersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie
Chatzisarantis, Nikos L.D.
Food Choice and Nutrition: A Social Psychological Perspective
title Food Choice and Nutrition: A Social Psychological Perspective
title_full Food Choice and Nutrition: A Social Psychological Perspective
title_fullStr Food Choice and Nutrition: A Social Psychological Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Food Choice and Nutrition: A Social Psychological Perspective
title_short Food Choice and Nutrition: A Social Psychological Perspective
title_sort food choice and nutrition: a social psychological perspective
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26665419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7105424
work_keys_str_mv AT hardcastlesarahj foodchoiceandnutritionasocialpsychologicalperspective
AT thøgersenntoumanicecilie foodchoiceandnutritionasocialpsychologicalperspective
AT chatzisarantisnikosld foodchoiceandnutritionasocialpsychologicalperspective