Cargando…

The usefulness of routine histopathology of bilateral nasal polyps – a systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost evaluation

BACKGROUND: Controversy regarding the usefulness of routine histopathological examination of bilateral nasal polyps removed during endoscopic sinus surgery to identify occult diagnoses still exists. There is a paucity of high-level evidence in the literature. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Jay SM, Hoffbauer, Stephanie, Yeh, David H, Rotenberg, Brian, Gupta, Michael, Sommer, Doron D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26537414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-015-0100-8
_version_ 1782399041637711872
author Wong, Jay SM
Hoffbauer, Stephanie
Yeh, David H
Rotenberg, Brian
Gupta, Michael
Sommer, Doron D
author_facet Wong, Jay SM
Hoffbauer, Stephanie
Yeh, David H
Rotenberg, Brian
Gupta, Michael
Sommer, Doron D
author_sort Wong, Jay SM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Controversy regarding the usefulness of routine histopathological examination of bilateral nasal polyps removed during endoscopic sinus surgery to identify occult diagnoses still exists. There is a paucity of high-level evidence in the literature. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Two independent reviewers were used. Pooled proportions and numbers needed to screen were calculated. A cost per life year model was generated based on varying survival benefits and compared to other Canadian screening programs to provide financial context. RESULTS: Six studies (n = 3772 patients) were included. Of the 3772 patients, 3751 had a pre-operative clinical and post-operative pathological diagnosis of inflammatory nasal polyps. Agreement proportion was 99.44 %. There were 18 unexpected benign and three unexpected malignant diagnoses identified. This translated to a proportion of 0.48 and 0.08 % respectively. Number needed to screen was 210 and 1258 respectively. Pooled proportion for expected findings using a random effect model was 0.99 (95 % CI = 0.99–1). Pooled proportion for unexpected benign findings using a random effect model was 0.00522 (95 % CI = 0.00133–0.01). Pooled proportion for unexpected malignant findings using a random effect model was 0.00107 (95 % CI = 0.000147–0.00283). The cost to pick up one unexpected benign diagnosis was $14557.2. The cost to pick up 1 unexpected malignant diagnosis was $87204.56. Cost per quality life year calculated ranged from 3211.83 to $64677.58 based on varying assumptions on the survival benefits of identifying an unexpected malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Routine pathological examination in screening for neoplasia may be low yield, however, no compelling evidence was found to cease such practice. Surgeons should exercise individual judgment in requesting routine examination. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40463-015-0100-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4632485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46324852015-11-05 The usefulness of routine histopathology of bilateral nasal polyps – a systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost evaluation Wong, Jay SM Hoffbauer, Stephanie Yeh, David H Rotenberg, Brian Gupta, Michael Sommer, Doron D J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Review BACKGROUND: Controversy regarding the usefulness of routine histopathological examination of bilateral nasal polyps removed during endoscopic sinus surgery to identify occult diagnoses still exists. There is a paucity of high-level evidence in the literature. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Two independent reviewers were used. Pooled proportions and numbers needed to screen were calculated. A cost per life year model was generated based on varying survival benefits and compared to other Canadian screening programs to provide financial context. RESULTS: Six studies (n = 3772 patients) were included. Of the 3772 patients, 3751 had a pre-operative clinical and post-operative pathological diagnosis of inflammatory nasal polyps. Agreement proportion was 99.44 %. There were 18 unexpected benign and three unexpected malignant diagnoses identified. This translated to a proportion of 0.48 and 0.08 % respectively. Number needed to screen was 210 and 1258 respectively. Pooled proportion for expected findings using a random effect model was 0.99 (95 % CI = 0.99–1). Pooled proportion for unexpected benign findings using a random effect model was 0.00522 (95 % CI = 0.00133–0.01). Pooled proportion for unexpected malignant findings using a random effect model was 0.00107 (95 % CI = 0.000147–0.00283). The cost to pick up one unexpected benign diagnosis was $14557.2. The cost to pick up 1 unexpected malignant diagnosis was $87204.56. Cost per quality life year calculated ranged from 3211.83 to $64677.58 based on varying assumptions on the survival benefits of identifying an unexpected malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Routine pathological examination in screening for neoplasia may be low yield, however, no compelling evidence was found to cease such practice. Surgeons should exercise individual judgment in requesting routine examination. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40463-015-0100-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4632485/ /pubmed/26537414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-015-0100-8 Text en © Wong et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Wong, Jay SM
Hoffbauer, Stephanie
Yeh, David H
Rotenberg, Brian
Gupta, Michael
Sommer, Doron D
The usefulness of routine histopathology of bilateral nasal polyps – a systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost evaluation
title The usefulness of routine histopathology of bilateral nasal polyps – a systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost evaluation
title_full The usefulness of routine histopathology of bilateral nasal polyps – a systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost evaluation
title_fullStr The usefulness of routine histopathology of bilateral nasal polyps – a systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The usefulness of routine histopathology of bilateral nasal polyps – a systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost evaluation
title_short The usefulness of routine histopathology of bilateral nasal polyps – a systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost evaluation
title_sort usefulness of routine histopathology of bilateral nasal polyps – a systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost evaluation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26537414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-015-0100-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wongjaysm theusefulnessofroutinehistopathologyofbilateralnasalpolypsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandcostevaluation
AT hoffbauerstephanie theusefulnessofroutinehistopathologyofbilateralnasalpolypsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandcostevaluation
AT yehdavidh theusefulnessofroutinehistopathologyofbilateralnasalpolypsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandcostevaluation
AT rotenbergbrian theusefulnessofroutinehistopathologyofbilateralnasalpolypsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandcostevaluation
AT guptamichael theusefulnessofroutinehistopathologyofbilateralnasalpolypsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandcostevaluation
AT sommerdorond theusefulnessofroutinehistopathologyofbilateralnasalpolypsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandcostevaluation
AT wongjaysm usefulnessofroutinehistopathologyofbilateralnasalpolypsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandcostevaluation
AT hoffbauerstephanie usefulnessofroutinehistopathologyofbilateralnasalpolypsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandcostevaluation
AT yehdavidh usefulnessofroutinehistopathologyofbilateralnasalpolypsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandcostevaluation
AT rotenbergbrian usefulnessofroutinehistopathologyofbilateralnasalpolypsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandcostevaluation
AT guptamichael usefulnessofroutinehistopathologyofbilateralnasalpolypsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandcostevaluation
AT sommerdorond usefulnessofroutinehistopathologyofbilateralnasalpolypsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandcostevaluation