Cargando…

Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry

BACKGROUND: Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO(2)max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO(2)max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, af...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silva, Christina G. de Souza e, Araújo, Claudio Gil S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26559985
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20150089
_version_ 1782399132597485568
author Silva, Christina G. de Souza e
Araújo, Claudio Gil S.
author_facet Silva, Christina G. de Souza e
Araújo, Claudio Gil S.
author_sort Silva, Christina G. de Souza e
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO(2)max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO(2)max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, affecting clinical decisions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the error of estimate of VO(2)max in cycle ergometry in a population attending clinical exercise testing laboratories, and to propose sex-specific equations to minimize that error. METHODS: This study assessed 1715 adults (18 to 91 years, 68% men) undertaking maximum CPX in a lower limbs cycle ergometer (LLCE) with ramp protocol. The percentage error (E%) between measured VO(2)max and that estimated from the modified ACSM equation (Lang et al. MSSE, 1992) was calculated. Then, estimation equations were developed: 1) for all the population tested (C-GENERAL); and 2) separately by sex (C-MEN and C-WOMEN). RESULTS: Measured VO(2)max was higher in men than in WOMEN: -29.4 ± 10.5 and 24.2 ± 9.2 mL.(kg.min)(-1) (p < 0.01). The equations for estimating VO(2)max [in mL.(kg.min)(-1)] were: C-GENERAL = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.483 + 7; C-MEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.791 + 7; and C-WOMEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 9.820 + 7. The E% for MEN was: -3.4 ± 13.4% (modified ACSM); 1.2 ± 13.2% (C-GENERAL); and -0.9 ± 13.4% (C-MEN) (p < 0.01). For WOMEN: -14.7 ± 17.4% (modified ACSM); -6.3 ± 16.5% (C-GENERAL); and -1.7 ± 16.2% (C-WOMEN) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The error of estimate of VO(2)max by use of sex-specific equations was reduced, but not eliminated, in exercise tests on LLCE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4633002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46330022015-11-05 Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry Silva, Christina G. de Souza e Araújo, Claudio Gil S. Arq Bras Cardiol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO(2)max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO(2)max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, affecting clinical decisions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the error of estimate of VO(2)max in cycle ergometry in a population attending clinical exercise testing laboratories, and to propose sex-specific equations to minimize that error. METHODS: This study assessed 1715 adults (18 to 91 years, 68% men) undertaking maximum CPX in a lower limbs cycle ergometer (LLCE) with ramp protocol. The percentage error (E%) between measured VO(2)max and that estimated from the modified ACSM equation (Lang et al. MSSE, 1992) was calculated. Then, estimation equations were developed: 1) for all the population tested (C-GENERAL); and 2) separately by sex (C-MEN and C-WOMEN). RESULTS: Measured VO(2)max was higher in men than in WOMEN: -29.4 ± 10.5 and 24.2 ± 9.2 mL.(kg.min)(-1) (p < 0.01). The equations for estimating VO(2)max [in mL.(kg.min)(-1)] were: C-GENERAL = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.483 + 7; C-MEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.791 + 7; and C-WOMEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 9.820 + 7. The E% for MEN was: -3.4 ± 13.4% (modified ACSM); 1.2 ± 13.2% (C-GENERAL); and -0.9 ± 13.4% (C-MEN) (p < 0.01). For WOMEN: -14.7 ± 17.4% (modified ACSM); -6.3 ± 16.5% (C-GENERAL); and -1.7 ± 16.2% (C-WOMEN) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The error of estimate of VO(2)max by use of sex-specific equations was reduced, but not eliminated, in exercise tests on LLCE. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4633002/ /pubmed/26559985 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20150089 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Silva, Christina G. de Souza e
Araújo, Claudio Gil S.
Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
title Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
title_full Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
title_fullStr Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
title_full_unstemmed Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
title_short Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
title_sort sex-specific equations to estimate maximum oxygen uptake in cycle ergometry
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26559985
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20150089
work_keys_str_mv AT silvachristinagdesouzae sexspecificequationstoestimatemaximumoxygenuptakeincycleergometry
AT araujoclaudiogils sexspecificequationstoestimatemaximumoxygenuptakeincycleergometry