Cargando…
Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
BACKGROUND: Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO(2)max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO(2)max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, af...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26559985 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20150089 |
_version_ | 1782399132597485568 |
---|---|
author | Silva, Christina G. de Souza e Araújo, Claudio Gil S. |
author_facet | Silva, Christina G. de Souza e Araújo, Claudio Gil S. |
author_sort | Silva, Christina G. de Souza e |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO(2)max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO(2)max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, affecting clinical decisions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the error of estimate of VO(2)max in cycle ergometry in a population attending clinical exercise testing laboratories, and to propose sex-specific equations to minimize that error. METHODS: This study assessed 1715 adults (18 to 91 years, 68% men) undertaking maximum CPX in a lower limbs cycle ergometer (LLCE) with ramp protocol. The percentage error (E%) between measured VO(2)max and that estimated from the modified ACSM equation (Lang et al. MSSE, 1992) was calculated. Then, estimation equations were developed: 1) for all the population tested (C-GENERAL); and 2) separately by sex (C-MEN and C-WOMEN). RESULTS: Measured VO(2)max was higher in men than in WOMEN: -29.4 ± 10.5 and 24.2 ± 9.2 mL.(kg.min)(-1) (p < 0.01). The equations for estimating VO(2)max [in mL.(kg.min)(-1)] were: C-GENERAL = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.483 + 7; C-MEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.791 + 7; and C-WOMEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 9.820 + 7. The E% for MEN was: -3.4 ± 13.4% (modified ACSM); 1.2 ± 13.2% (C-GENERAL); and -0.9 ± 13.4% (C-MEN) (p < 0.01). For WOMEN: -14.7 ± 17.4% (modified ACSM); -6.3 ± 16.5% (C-GENERAL); and -1.7 ± 16.2% (C-WOMEN) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The error of estimate of VO(2)max by use of sex-specific equations was reduced, but not eliminated, in exercise tests on LLCE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4633002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46330022015-11-05 Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry Silva, Christina G. de Souza e Araújo, Claudio Gil S. Arq Bras Cardiol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO(2)max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO(2)max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, affecting clinical decisions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the error of estimate of VO(2)max in cycle ergometry in a population attending clinical exercise testing laboratories, and to propose sex-specific equations to minimize that error. METHODS: This study assessed 1715 adults (18 to 91 years, 68% men) undertaking maximum CPX in a lower limbs cycle ergometer (LLCE) with ramp protocol. The percentage error (E%) between measured VO(2)max and that estimated from the modified ACSM equation (Lang et al. MSSE, 1992) was calculated. Then, estimation equations were developed: 1) for all the population tested (C-GENERAL); and 2) separately by sex (C-MEN and C-WOMEN). RESULTS: Measured VO(2)max was higher in men than in WOMEN: -29.4 ± 10.5 and 24.2 ± 9.2 mL.(kg.min)(-1) (p < 0.01). The equations for estimating VO(2)max [in mL.(kg.min)(-1)] were: C-GENERAL = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.483 + 7; C-MEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.791 + 7; and C-WOMEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 9.820 + 7. The E% for MEN was: -3.4 ± 13.4% (modified ACSM); 1.2 ± 13.2% (C-GENERAL); and -0.9 ± 13.4% (C-MEN) (p < 0.01). For WOMEN: -14.7 ± 17.4% (modified ACSM); -6.3 ± 16.5% (C-GENERAL); and -1.7 ± 16.2% (C-WOMEN) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The error of estimate of VO(2)max by use of sex-specific equations was reduced, but not eliminated, in exercise tests on LLCE. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4633002/ /pubmed/26559985 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20150089 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Silva, Christina G. de Souza e Araújo, Claudio Gil S. Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry |
title | Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle
Ergometry |
title_full | Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle
Ergometry |
title_fullStr | Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle
Ergometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle
Ergometry |
title_short | Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle
Ergometry |
title_sort | sex-specific equations to estimate maximum oxygen uptake in cycle
ergometry |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26559985 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20150089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvachristinagdesouzae sexspecificequationstoestimatemaximumoxygenuptakeincycleergometry AT araujoclaudiogils sexspecificequationstoestimatemaximumoxygenuptakeincycleergometry |