Cargando…
Readjustment of abdominal computed tomography protocols in a university hospital: impact on radiation dose
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reduction of estimated radiation dose in abdominal computed tomography following the implementation of new scan protocols on the basis of clinical suspicion and of adjusted images acquisition parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective and prospective review of reports...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por
Imagem
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26543280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0054 |
_version_ | 1782399144386625536 |
---|---|
author | Romano, Ricardo Francisco Tavares Salvadori, Priscila Silveira Torres, Lucas Rios Bretas, Elisa Almeida Sathler Bekhor, Daniel Caldana, Rogério Pedreschi Medeiros, Regina Bitelli D’Ippolito, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Romano, Ricardo Francisco Tavares Salvadori, Priscila Silveira Torres, Lucas Rios Bretas, Elisa Almeida Sathler Bekhor, Daniel Caldana, Rogério Pedreschi Medeiros, Regina Bitelli D’Ippolito, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Romano, Ricardo Francisco Tavares |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the reduction of estimated radiation dose in abdominal computed tomography following the implementation of new scan protocols on the basis of clinical suspicion and of adjusted images acquisition parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective and prospective review of reports on radiation dose from abdominal CT scans performed three months before (group A – 551 studies) and three months after (group B – 788 studies) implementation of new scan protocols proposed as a function of clinical indications. Also, the images acquisition parameters were adjusted to reduce the radiation dose at each scan phase. The groups were compared for mean number of acquisition phases, mean CTDI(vol) per phase, mean DLP per phase, and mean DLP per scan. RESULTS: A significant reduction was observed for group B as regards all the analyzed aspects, as follows: 33.9%, 25.0%, 27.0% and 52.5%, respectively for number of acquisition phases, CTDI(vol) per phase, DLP per phase and DLP per scan (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The rational use of abdominal computed tomography scan phases based on the clinical suspicion in conjunction with the adjusted images acquisition parameters allows for a 50% reduction in the radiation dose from abdominal computed tomography scans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4633073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por
Imagem |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46330732015-11-05 Readjustment of abdominal computed tomography protocols in a university hospital: impact on radiation dose Romano, Ricardo Francisco Tavares Salvadori, Priscila Silveira Torres, Lucas Rios Bretas, Elisa Almeida Sathler Bekhor, Daniel Caldana, Rogério Pedreschi Medeiros, Regina Bitelli D’Ippolito, Giuseppe Radiol Bras Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To assess the reduction of estimated radiation dose in abdominal computed tomography following the implementation of new scan protocols on the basis of clinical suspicion and of adjusted images acquisition parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective and prospective review of reports on radiation dose from abdominal CT scans performed three months before (group A – 551 studies) and three months after (group B – 788 studies) implementation of new scan protocols proposed as a function of clinical indications. Also, the images acquisition parameters were adjusted to reduce the radiation dose at each scan phase. The groups were compared for mean number of acquisition phases, mean CTDI(vol) per phase, mean DLP per phase, and mean DLP per scan. RESULTS: A significant reduction was observed for group B as regards all the analyzed aspects, as follows: 33.9%, 25.0%, 27.0% and 52.5%, respectively for number of acquisition phases, CTDI(vol) per phase, DLP per phase and DLP per scan (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The rational use of abdominal computed tomography scan phases based on the clinical suspicion in conjunction with the adjusted images acquisition parameters allows for a 50% reduction in the radiation dose from abdominal computed tomography scans. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4633073/ /pubmed/26543280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0054 Text en © Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Romano, Ricardo Francisco Tavares Salvadori, Priscila Silveira Torres, Lucas Rios Bretas, Elisa Almeida Sathler Bekhor, Daniel Caldana, Rogério Pedreschi Medeiros, Regina Bitelli D’Ippolito, Giuseppe Readjustment of abdominal computed tomography protocols in a university hospital: impact on radiation dose |
title | Readjustment of abdominal computed tomography protocols in a university
hospital: impact on radiation dose |
title_full | Readjustment of abdominal computed tomography protocols in a university
hospital: impact on radiation dose |
title_fullStr | Readjustment of abdominal computed tomography protocols in a university
hospital: impact on radiation dose |
title_full_unstemmed | Readjustment of abdominal computed tomography protocols in a university
hospital: impact on radiation dose |
title_short | Readjustment of abdominal computed tomography protocols in a university
hospital: impact on radiation dose |
title_sort | readjustment of abdominal computed tomography protocols in a university
hospital: impact on radiation dose |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26543280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0054 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT romanoricardofranciscotavares readjustmentofabdominalcomputedtomographyprotocolsinauniversityhospitalimpactonradiationdose AT salvadoripriscilasilveira readjustmentofabdominalcomputedtomographyprotocolsinauniversityhospitalimpactonradiationdose AT torreslucasrios readjustmentofabdominalcomputedtomographyprotocolsinauniversityhospitalimpactonradiationdose AT bretaselisaalmeidasathler readjustmentofabdominalcomputedtomographyprotocolsinauniversityhospitalimpactonradiationdose AT bekhordaniel readjustmentofabdominalcomputedtomographyprotocolsinauniversityhospitalimpactonradiationdose AT caldanarogeriopedreschi readjustmentofabdominalcomputedtomographyprotocolsinauniversityhospitalimpactonradiationdose AT medeirosreginabitelli readjustmentofabdominalcomputedtomographyprotocolsinauniversityhospitalimpactonradiationdose AT dippolitogiuseppe readjustmentofabdominalcomputedtomographyprotocolsinauniversityhospitalimpactonradiationdose |