Cargando…

Validation and Reliability of a Novel Test of Upper Body Isometric Strength

The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the association of a novel test of upper body isometric strength against a 1RM bench press measurement. Forty college age adults (n = 20 female, n = 20 male; age 22.8 ± 2.8 years; body height 171.6 ± 10.8 cm; body mass 73.5 ± 16.3 kg; body fat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bellar, David, Marcus, Lena, Judge, Lawrence W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0074
_version_ 1782399179496095744
author Bellar, David
Marcus, Lena
Judge, Lawrence W.
author_facet Bellar, David
Marcus, Lena
Judge, Lawrence W.
author_sort Bellar, David
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the association of a novel test of upper body isometric strength against a 1RM bench press measurement. Forty college age adults (n = 20 female, n = 20 male; age 22.8 ± 2.8 years; body height 171.6 ± 10.8 cm; body mass 73.5 ± 16.3 kg; body fat 23.1 ± 5.4%) volunteered for the present investigation. The participants reported to the lab on three occasions. The first visit included anthropometric measurements and familiarization with both the upper body isometric test and bench press exercise. The final visits were conducted in a randomized order, with one being a 1RM assessment on the bench press and the other consisting of three trials of the upper body isometric assessment. For the isometric test, participants were positioned in a “push-up” style position while tethered (stainless steel chain) to a load cell (high frequency) anchored to the ground. The peak isometric force was consistent across all three trials (ICC = 0.98) suggesting good reliability. Multiple regression analysis was completed with the predictors: peak isometric force, gender, against the outcome variable 1RM bench press. The analysis resulted in a significant model (r2 = 0.861, p≤0.001) with all predictor variables attaining significance in the model (p<0.05). Isometric peak strength had the greatest effect on the model (Beta = 5.19, p≤0.001). Results from this study suggest that the described isometric upper body strength assessment is likely a valid and reliable tool to determine strength. Further research is warranted to gather a larger pool of data in regard to this assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4633254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46332542015-11-09 Validation and Reliability of a Novel Test of Upper Body Isometric Strength Bellar, David Marcus, Lena Judge, Lawrence W. J Hum Kinet Research Article The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the association of a novel test of upper body isometric strength against a 1RM bench press measurement. Forty college age adults (n = 20 female, n = 20 male; age 22.8 ± 2.8 years; body height 171.6 ± 10.8 cm; body mass 73.5 ± 16.3 kg; body fat 23.1 ± 5.4%) volunteered for the present investigation. The participants reported to the lab on three occasions. The first visit included anthropometric measurements and familiarization with both the upper body isometric test and bench press exercise. The final visits were conducted in a randomized order, with one being a 1RM assessment on the bench press and the other consisting of three trials of the upper body isometric assessment. For the isometric test, participants were positioned in a “push-up” style position while tethered (stainless steel chain) to a load cell (high frequency) anchored to the ground. The peak isometric force was consistent across all three trials (ICC = 0.98) suggesting good reliability. Multiple regression analysis was completed with the predictors: peak isometric force, gender, against the outcome variable 1RM bench press. The analysis resulted in a significant model (r2 = 0.861, p≤0.001) with all predictor variables attaining significance in the model (p<0.05). Isometric peak strength had the greatest effect on the model (Beta = 5.19, p≤0.001). Results from this study suggest that the described isometric upper body strength assessment is likely a valid and reliable tool to determine strength. Further research is warranted to gather a larger pool of data in regard to this assessment. Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach 2015-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4633254/ /pubmed/26557203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0074 Text en © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Bellar, David
Marcus, Lena
Judge, Lawrence W.
Validation and Reliability of a Novel Test of Upper Body Isometric Strength
title Validation and Reliability of a Novel Test of Upper Body Isometric Strength
title_full Validation and Reliability of a Novel Test of Upper Body Isometric Strength
title_fullStr Validation and Reliability of a Novel Test of Upper Body Isometric Strength
title_full_unstemmed Validation and Reliability of a Novel Test of Upper Body Isometric Strength
title_short Validation and Reliability of a Novel Test of Upper Body Isometric Strength
title_sort validation and reliability of a novel test of upper body isometric strength
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0074
work_keys_str_mv AT bellardavid validationandreliabilityofanoveltestofupperbodyisometricstrength
AT marcuslena validationandreliabilityofanoveltestofupperbodyisometricstrength
AT judgelawrencew validationandreliabilityofanoveltestofupperbodyisometricstrength