Cargando…

Does the position of shoulder immobilization after reduced anterior glenohumeral dislocation affect coaptation of a Bankart lesion? An arthrographic comparison

BACKGROUND: The position of immobilization after anterior shoulder dislocation has been a controversial topic over the past decade. We compared the effect of post-reduction immobilization, whether external rotation or internal rotation, on coaptation of the torn labrum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Momenzadeh, Omid Reza, Pourmokhtari, Masoome, Sefidbakht, Sepideh, Vosoughi, Amir Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25894458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-015-0348-9
_version_ 1782399190270214144
author Momenzadeh, Omid Reza
Pourmokhtari, Masoome
Sefidbakht, Sepideh
Vosoughi, Amir Reza
author_facet Momenzadeh, Omid Reza
Pourmokhtari, Masoome
Sefidbakht, Sepideh
Vosoughi, Amir Reza
author_sort Momenzadeh, Omid Reza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The position of immobilization after anterior shoulder dislocation has been a controversial topic over the past decade. We compared the effect of post-reduction immobilization, whether external rotation or internal rotation, on coaptation of the torn labrum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients aged <40 years with primary anterior shoulder dislocation without associated fractures were randomized to post-reduction external rotation immobilization (nine patients) or internal rotation (11 patients). After 3 weeks, magnetic resonance arthrography was performed. Displacement, separation, and opening angle parameters were assessed and analyzed. RESULTS: Separation (1.16 ± 1.11 vs 2.43 ± 1.17 mm), displacement (1.73 ± 1.64 vs 2.28 ± 1.36 mm), and opening angle (15.00 ± 15.84 vs 27.86 ± 14.74 °) in the externally rotated group were decreased in comparison to the internally rotated group. A statistically significant difference between groups was seen only for separation (p = 0.028); p values of displacement and opening angle were 0.354 and 0.099, respectively. CONCLUSION: External rotation immobilization after reduction of primary anterior shoulder dislocation could result in a decrease in anterior capsule detachment and labral reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4633418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46334182015-11-10 Does the position of shoulder immobilization after reduced anterior glenohumeral dislocation affect coaptation of a Bankart lesion? An arthrographic comparison Momenzadeh, Omid Reza Pourmokhtari, Masoome Sefidbakht, Sepideh Vosoughi, Amir Reza J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: The position of immobilization after anterior shoulder dislocation has been a controversial topic over the past decade. We compared the effect of post-reduction immobilization, whether external rotation or internal rotation, on coaptation of the torn labrum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients aged <40 years with primary anterior shoulder dislocation without associated fractures were randomized to post-reduction external rotation immobilization (nine patients) or internal rotation (11 patients). After 3 weeks, magnetic resonance arthrography was performed. Displacement, separation, and opening angle parameters were assessed and analyzed. RESULTS: Separation (1.16 ± 1.11 vs 2.43 ± 1.17 mm), displacement (1.73 ± 1.64 vs 2.28 ± 1.36 mm), and opening angle (15.00 ± 15.84 vs 27.86 ± 14.74 °) in the externally rotated group were decreased in comparison to the internally rotated group. A statistically significant difference between groups was seen only for separation (p = 0.028); p values of displacement and opening angle were 0.354 and 0.099, respectively. CONCLUSION: External rotation immobilization after reduction of primary anterior shoulder dislocation could result in a decrease in anterior capsule detachment and labral reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. Springer International Publishing 2015-04-17 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4633418/ /pubmed/25894458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-015-0348-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Momenzadeh, Omid Reza
Pourmokhtari, Masoome
Sefidbakht, Sepideh
Vosoughi, Amir Reza
Does the position of shoulder immobilization after reduced anterior glenohumeral dislocation affect coaptation of a Bankart lesion? An arthrographic comparison
title Does the position of shoulder immobilization after reduced anterior glenohumeral dislocation affect coaptation of a Bankart lesion? An arthrographic comparison
title_full Does the position of shoulder immobilization after reduced anterior glenohumeral dislocation affect coaptation of a Bankart lesion? An arthrographic comparison
title_fullStr Does the position of shoulder immobilization after reduced anterior glenohumeral dislocation affect coaptation of a Bankart lesion? An arthrographic comparison
title_full_unstemmed Does the position of shoulder immobilization after reduced anterior glenohumeral dislocation affect coaptation of a Bankart lesion? An arthrographic comparison
title_short Does the position of shoulder immobilization after reduced anterior glenohumeral dislocation affect coaptation of a Bankart lesion? An arthrographic comparison
title_sort does the position of shoulder immobilization after reduced anterior glenohumeral dislocation affect coaptation of a bankart lesion? an arthrographic comparison
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25894458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-015-0348-9
work_keys_str_mv AT momenzadehomidreza doesthepositionofshoulderimmobilizationafterreducedanteriorglenohumeraldislocationaffectcoaptationofabankartlesionanarthrographiccomparison
AT pourmokhtarimasoome doesthepositionofshoulderimmobilizationafterreducedanteriorglenohumeraldislocationaffectcoaptationofabankartlesionanarthrographiccomparison
AT sefidbakhtsepideh doesthepositionofshoulderimmobilizationafterreducedanteriorglenohumeraldislocationaffectcoaptationofabankartlesionanarthrographiccomparison
AT vosoughiamirreza doesthepositionofshoulderimmobilizationafterreducedanteriorglenohumeraldislocationaffectcoaptationofabankartlesionanarthrographiccomparison