Cargando…
ERP markers of target selection discriminate children with high vs. low working memory capacity
Selective attention enables enhancing a subset out of multiple competing items to maximize the capacity of our limited visual working memory (VWM) system. Multiple behavioral and electrophysiological studies have revealed the cognitive and neural mechanisms supporting adults’ selective attention of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26594157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00153 |
_version_ | 1782399202163163136 |
---|---|
author | Shimi, Andria Nobre, Anna Christina Scerif, Gaia |
author_facet | Shimi, Andria Nobre, Anna Christina Scerif, Gaia |
author_sort | Shimi, Andria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Selective attention enables enhancing a subset out of multiple competing items to maximize the capacity of our limited visual working memory (VWM) system. Multiple behavioral and electrophysiological studies have revealed the cognitive and neural mechanisms supporting adults’ selective attention of visual percepts for encoding in VWM. However, research on children is more limited. What are the neural mechanisms involved in children’s selection of incoming percepts in service of VWM? Do these differ from the ones subserving adults’ selection? Ten-year-olds and adults used a spatial arrow cue to select a colored item for later recognition from an array of four colored items. The temporal dynamics of selection were investigated through EEG signals locked to the onset of the memory array. Both children and adults elicited significantly more negative activity over posterior scalp locations contralateral to the item to-be-selected for encoding (N2pc). However, this activity was elicited later and for longer in children compared to adults. Furthermore, although children as a group did not elicit a significant N2pc during the time-window in which N2pc was elicited in adults, the magnitude of N2pc during the “adult time-window” related to their behavioral performance during the later recognition phase of the task. This in turn highlights how children’s neural activity subserving attention during encoding relates to better subsequent VWM performance. Significant differences were observed when children were divided into groups of high vs. low VWM capacity as a function of cueing benefit. Children with large cue benefits in VWM capacity elicited an adult-like contralateral negativity following attentional selection of the to-be-encoded item, whereas children with low VWM capacity did not. These results corroborate the close coupling between selective attention and VWM from childhood and elucidate further the attentional mechanisms constraining VWM performance in children. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4633470 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46334702015-11-20 ERP markers of target selection discriminate children with high vs. low working memory capacity Shimi, Andria Nobre, Anna Christina Scerif, Gaia Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Selective attention enables enhancing a subset out of multiple competing items to maximize the capacity of our limited visual working memory (VWM) system. Multiple behavioral and electrophysiological studies have revealed the cognitive and neural mechanisms supporting adults’ selective attention of visual percepts for encoding in VWM. However, research on children is more limited. What are the neural mechanisms involved in children’s selection of incoming percepts in service of VWM? Do these differ from the ones subserving adults’ selection? Ten-year-olds and adults used a spatial arrow cue to select a colored item for later recognition from an array of four colored items. The temporal dynamics of selection were investigated through EEG signals locked to the onset of the memory array. Both children and adults elicited significantly more negative activity over posterior scalp locations contralateral to the item to-be-selected for encoding (N2pc). However, this activity was elicited later and for longer in children compared to adults. Furthermore, although children as a group did not elicit a significant N2pc during the time-window in which N2pc was elicited in adults, the magnitude of N2pc during the “adult time-window” related to their behavioral performance during the later recognition phase of the task. This in turn highlights how children’s neural activity subserving attention during encoding relates to better subsequent VWM performance. Significant differences were observed when children were divided into groups of high vs. low VWM capacity as a function of cueing benefit. Children with large cue benefits in VWM capacity elicited an adult-like contralateral negativity following attentional selection of the to-be-encoded item, whereas children with low VWM capacity did not. These results corroborate the close coupling between selective attention and VWM from childhood and elucidate further the attentional mechanisms constraining VWM performance in children. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4633470/ /pubmed/26594157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00153 Text en Copyright © 2015 Shimi, Nobre and Scerif. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Shimi, Andria Nobre, Anna Christina Scerif, Gaia ERP markers of target selection discriminate children with high vs. low working memory capacity |
title | ERP markers of target selection discriminate children with high vs. low working memory capacity |
title_full | ERP markers of target selection discriminate children with high vs. low working memory capacity |
title_fullStr | ERP markers of target selection discriminate children with high vs. low working memory capacity |
title_full_unstemmed | ERP markers of target selection discriminate children with high vs. low working memory capacity |
title_short | ERP markers of target selection discriminate children with high vs. low working memory capacity |
title_sort | erp markers of target selection discriminate children with high vs. low working memory capacity |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26594157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shimiandria erpmarkersoftargetselectiondiscriminatechildrenwithhighvslowworkingmemorycapacity AT nobreannachristina erpmarkersoftargetselectiondiscriminatechildrenwithhighvslowworkingmemorycapacity AT scerifgaia erpmarkersoftargetselectiondiscriminatechildrenwithhighvslowworkingmemorycapacity |