Cargando…

Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial

BACKGROUND: In critically ill children, in-line microfilters may reduce the incidence of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), the overall complication and organ dysfunction rate. No data on the use of in-line microfilters exist in critically ill adults. METHODS: In this prospective, r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse, Brunauer, Andreas, Dankl, Daniel, Wirthel, Elisabeth, Meburger, Ingeborg, Bayer, Angela, Mandl, Michaela, Dünser, Martin W., Grander, Wilhelm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26538309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-015-0080-x
_version_ 1782399202402238464
author Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse
Brunauer, Andreas
Dankl, Daniel
Wirthel, Elisabeth
Meburger, Ingeborg
Bayer, Angela
Mandl, Michaela
Dünser, Martin W.
Grander, Wilhelm
author_facet Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse
Brunauer, Andreas
Dankl, Daniel
Wirthel, Elisabeth
Meburger, Ingeborg
Bayer, Angela
Mandl, Michaela
Dünser, Martin W.
Grander, Wilhelm
author_sort Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In critically ill children, in-line microfilters may reduce the incidence of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), the overall complication and organ dysfunction rate. No data on the use of in-line microfilters exist in critically ill adults. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled open-label study, we evaluated the influence of in-line microfilters on systemic immune activation in 504 critically ill adults with a central venous catheter in place and an expected length of stay in the intensive care unit >24 h. Patients were randomized to have in-line microfilters placed into all intravenous lines (intervention group) or usual care (control group). The primary endpoint was the number of intensive care unit days with SIRS. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of SIRS, SIRS criteria per day, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay, the incidence of acute lung injury, maximum C-reactive protein, maximum white blood cell count, incidence of new candida and/or central-line-associated bloodstream infections, incidence of new thromboembolic complications, cumulative insulin requirements and presence of hyper- or hypoglycemia. RESULTS: The study groups did not differ in any baseline variable. There was no difference in the number of days in the intensive care unit with SIRS between microfilter and control patients [2 (0.8–4.7) vs. 1.8 (0.7–4.4), p = 0.62]. Except for a higher incidence of SIRS in microfilter patients (99.6 vs. 96.8 %, p = 0.04), no difference between the groups was observed in any secondary outcome parameter. Results did not change when only patients with an intensive care unit length of stay of greater than 7 days were included in the analysis. The rate of adverse events was comparable between microfilter and control patients. In two patients allocated to the microfilter group, the study intervention was discontinued for technical reasons. Use of in-line microfilters was associated with additional costs. CONCLUSIONS: The use of in-line microfilters failed to modulate systemic inflammation and clinical outcome parameters in critically ill adults. Trial registration: Clinical Trials NCT01534390
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4633471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46334712015-11-10 Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse Brunauer, Andreas Dankl, Daniel Wirthel, Elisabeth Meburger, Ingeborg Bayer, Angela Mandl, Michaela Dünser, Martin W. Grander, Wilhelm Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: In critically ill children, in-line microfilters may reduce the incidence of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), the overall complication and organ dysfunction rate. No data on the use of in-line microfilters exist in critically ill adults. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled open-label study, we evaluated the influence of in-line microfilters on systemic immune activation in 504 critically ill adults with a central venous catheter in place and an expected length of stay in the intensive care unit >24 h. Patients were randomized to have in-line microfilters placed into all intravenous lines (intervention group) or usual care (control group). The primary endpoint was the number of intensive care unit days with SIRS. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of SIRS, SIRS criteria per day, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay, the incidence of acute lung injury, maximum C-reactive protein, maximum white blood cell count, incidence of new candida and/or central-line-associated bloodstream infections, incidence of new thromboembolic complications, cumulative insulin requirements and presence of hyper- or hypoglycemia. RESULTS: The study groups did not differ in any baseline variable. There was no difference in the number of days in the intensive care unit with SIRS between microfilter and control patients [2 (0.8–4.7) vs. 1.8 (0.7–4.4), p = 0.62]. Except for a higher incidence of SIRS in microfilter patients (99.6 vs. 96.8 %, p = 0.04), no difference between the groups was observed in any secondary outcome parameter. Results did not change when only patients with an intensive care unit length of stay of greater than 7 days were included in the analysis. The rate of adverse events was comparable between microfilter and control patients. In two patients allocated to the microfilter group, the study intervention was discontinued for technical reasons. Use of in-line microfilters was associated with additional costs. CONCLUSIONS: The use of in-line microfilters failed to modulate systemic inflammation and clinical outcome parameters in critically ill adults. Trial registration: Clinical Trials NCT01534390 Springer Paris 2015-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4633471/ /pubmed/26538309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-015-0080-x Text en © Gradwohl-Matis et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse
Brunauer, Andreas
Dankl, Daniel
Wirthel, Elisabeth
Meburger, Ingeborg
Bayer, Angela
Mandl, Michaela
Dünser, Martin W.
Grander, Wilhelm
Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial
title Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial
title_full Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial
title_fullStr Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial
title_full_unstemmed Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial
title_short Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial
title_sort influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26538309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-015-0080-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gradwohlmatisilse influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT brunauerandreas influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT dankldaniel influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT wirthelelisabeth influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT meburgeringeborg influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT bayerangela influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT mandlmichaela influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT dunsermartinw influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT granderwilhelm influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial