Cargando…
Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial
BACKGROUND: In critically ill children, in-line microfilters may reduce the incidence of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), the overall complication and organ dysfunction rate. No data on the use of in-line microfilters exist in critically ill adults. METHODS: In this prospective, r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Paris
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26538309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-015-0080-x |
_version_ | 1782399202402238464 |
---|---|
author | Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse Brunauer, Andreas Dankl, Daniel Wirthel, Elisabeth Meburger, Ingeborg Bayer, Angela Mandl, Michaela Dünser, Martin W. Grander, Wilhelm |
author_facet | Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse Brunauer, Andreas Dankl, Daniel Wirthel, Elisabeth Meburger, Ingeborg Bayer, Angela Mandl, Michaela Dünser, Martin W. Grander, Wilhelm |
author_sort | Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In critically ill children, in-line microfilters may reduce the incidence of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), the overall complication and organ dysfunction rate. No data on the use of in-line microfilters exist in critically ill adults. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled open-label study, we evaluated the influence of in-line microfilters on systemic immune activation in 504 critically ill adults with a central venous catheter in place and an expected length of stay in the intensive care unit >24 h. Patients were randomized to have in-line microfilters placed into all intravenous lines (intervention group) or usual care (control group). The primary endpoint was the number of intensive care unit days with SIRS. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of SIRS, SIRS criteria per day, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay, the incidence of acute lung injury, maximum C-reactive protein, maximum white blood cell count, incidence of new candida and/or central-line-associated bloodstream infections, incidence of new thromboembolic complications, cumulative insulin requirements and presence of hyper- or hypoglycemia. RESULTS: The study groups did not differ in any baseline variable. There was no difference in the number of days in the intensive care unit with SIRS between microfilter and control patients [2 (0.8–4.7) vs. 1.8 (0.7–4.4), p = 0.62]. Except for a higher incidence of SIRS in microfilter patients (99.6 vs. 96.8 %, p = 0.04), no difference between the groups was observed in any secondary outcome parameter. Results did not change when only patients with an intensive care unit length of stay of greater than 7 days were included in the analysis. The rate of adverse events was comparable between microfilter and control patients. In two patients allocated to the microfilter group, the study intervention was discontinued for technical reasons. Use of in-line microfilters was associated with additional costs. CONCLUSIONS: The use of in-line microfilters failed to modulate systemic inflammation and clinical outcome parameters in critically ill adults. Trial registration: Clinical Trials NCT01534390 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4633471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Paris |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46334712015-11-10 Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse Brunauer, Andreas Dankl, Daniel Wirthel, Elisabeth Meburger, Ingeborg Bayer, Angela Mandl, Michaela Dünser, Martin W. Grander, Wilhelm Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: In critically ill children, in-line microfilters may reduce the incidence of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), the overall complication and organ dysfunction rate. No data on the use of in-line microfilters exist in critically ill adults. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled open-label study, we evaluated the influence of in-line microfilters on systemic immune activation in 504 critically ill adults with a central venous catheter in place and an expected length of stay in the intensive care unit >24 h. Patients were randomized to have in-line microfilters placed into all intravenous lines (intervention group) or usual care (control group). The primary endpoint was the number of intensive care unit days with SIRS. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of SIRS, SIRS criteria per day, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay, the incidence of acute lung injury, maximum C-reactive protein, maximum white blood cell count, incidence of new candida and/or central-line-associated bloodstream infections, incidence of new thromboembolic complications, cumulative insulin requirements and presence of hyper- or hypoglycemia. RESULTS: The study groups did not differ in any baseline variable. There was no difference in the number of days in the intensive care unit with SIRS between microfilter and control patients [2 (0.8–4.7) vs. 1.8 (0.7–4.4), p = 0.62]. Except for a higher incidence of SIRS in microfilter patients (99.6 vs. 96.8 %, p = 0.04), no difference between the groups was observed in any secondary outcome parameter. Results did not change when only patients with an intensive care unit length of stay of greater than 7 days were included in the analysis. The rate of adverse events was comparable between microfilter and control patients. In two patients allocated to the microfilter group, the study intervention was discontinued for technical reasons. Use of in-line microfilters was associated with additional costs. CONCLUSIONS: The use of in-line microfilters failed to modulate systemic inflammation and clinical outcome parameters in critically ill adults. Trial registration: Clinical Trials NCT01534390 Springer Paris 2015-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4633471/ /pubmed/26538309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-015-0080-x Text en © Gradwohl-Matis et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse Brunauer, Andreas Dankl, Daniel Wirthel, Elisabeth Meburger, Ingeborg Bayer, Angela Mandl, Michaela Dünser, Martin W. Grander, Wilhelm Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial |
title | Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial |
title_full | Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial |
title_fullStr | Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial |
title_short | Influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial |
title_sort | influence of in-line microfilters on systemic inflammation in adult critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled open-label trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26538309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-015-0080-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gradwohlmatisilse influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT brunauerandreas influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT dankldaniel influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT wirthelelisabeth influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT meburgeringeborg influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT bayerangela influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT mandlmichaela influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT dunsermartinw influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT granderwilhelm influenceofinlinemicrofiltersonsystemicinflammationinadultcriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial |