Cargando…
Fourier power, subjective distance, and object categories all provide plausible models of BOLD responses in scene-selective visual areas
Perception of natural visual scenes activates several functional areas in the human brain, including the Parahippocampal Place Area (PPA), Retrosplenial Complex (RSC), and the Occipital Place Area (OPA). It is currently unclear what specific scene-related features are represented in these areas. Pre...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26594164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2015.00135 |
_version_ | 1782399206179209216 |
---|---|
author | Lescroart, Mark D. Stansbury, Dustin E. Gallant, Jack L. |
author_facet | Lescroart, Mark D. Stansbury, Dustin E. Gallant, Jack L. |
author_sort | Lescroart, Mark D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Perception of natural visual scenes activates several functional areas in the human brain, including the Parahippocampal Place Area (PPA), Retrosplenial Complex (RSC), and the Occipital Place Area (OPA). It is currently unclear what specific scene-related features are represented in these areas. Previous studies have suggested that PPA, RSC, and/or OPA might represent at least three qualitatively different classes of features: (1) 2D features related to Fourier power; (2) 3D spatial features such as the distance to objects in a scene; or (3) abstract features such as the categories of objects in a scene. To determine which of these hypotheses best describes the visual representation in scene-selective areas, we applied voxel-wise modeling (VM) to BOLD fMRI responses elicited by a set of 1386 images of natural scenes. VM provides an efficient method for testing competing hypotheses by comparing predictions of brain activity based on encoding models that instantiate each hypothesis. Here we evaluated three different encoding models that instantiate each of the three hypotheses listed above. We used linear regression to fit each encoding model to the fMRI data recorded from each voxel, and we evaluated each fit model by estimating the amount of variance it predicted in a withheld portion of the data set. We found that voxel-wise models based on Fourier power or the subjective distance to objects in each scene predicted much of the variance predicted by a model based on object categories. Furthermore, the response variance explained by these three models is largely shared, and the individual models explain little unique variance in responses. Based on an evaluation of previous studies and the data we present here, we conclude that there is currently no good basis to favor any one of the three alternative hypotheses about visual representation in scene-selective areas. We offer suggestions for further studies that may help resolve this issue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4633487 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46334872015-11-20 Fourier power, subjective distance, and object categories all provide plausible models of BOLD responses in scene-selective visual areas Lescroart, Mark D. Stansbury, Dustin E. Gallant, Jack L. Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience Perception of natural visual scenes activates several functional areas in the human brain, including the Parahippocampal Place Area (PPA), Retrosplenial Complex (RSC), and the Occipital Place Area (OPA). It is currently unclear what specific scene-related features are represented in these areas. Previous studies have suggested that PPA, RSC, and/or OPA might represent at least three qualitatively different classes of features: (1) 2D features related to Fourier power; (2) 3D spatial features such as the distance to objects in a scene; or (3) abstract features such as the categories of objects in a scene. To determine which of these hypotheses best describes the visual representation in scene-selective areas, we applied voxel-wise modeling (VM) to BOLD fMRI responses elicited by a set of 1386 images of natural scenes. VM provides an efficient method for testing competing hypotheses by comparing predictions of brain activity based on encoding models that instantiate each hypothesis. Here we evaluated three different encoding models that instantiate each of the three hypotheses listed above. We used linear regression to fit each encoding model to the fMRI data recorded from each voxel, and we evaluated each fit model by estimating the amount of variance it predicted in a withheld portion of the data set. We found that voxel-wise models based on Fourier power or the subjective distance to objects in each scene predicted much of the variance predicted by a model based on object categories. Furthermore, the response variance explained by these three models is largely shared, and the individual models explain little unique variance in responses. Based on an evaluation of previous studies and the data we present here, we conclude that there is currently no good basis to favor any one of the three alternative hypotheses about visual representation in scene-selective areas. We offer suggestions for further studies that may help resolve this issue. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4633487/ /pubmed/26594164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2015.00135 Text en Copyright © 2015 Lescroart, Stansbury and Gallant. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Lescroart, Mark D. Stansbury, Dustin E. Gallant, Jack L. Fourier power, subjective distance, and object categories all provide plausible models of BOLD responses in scene-selective visual areas |
title | Fourier power, subjective distance, and object categories all provide plausible models of BOLD responses in scene-selective visual areas |
title_full | Fourier power, subjective distance, and object categories all provide plausible models of BOLD responses in scene-selective visual areas |
title_fullStr | Fourier power, subjective distance, and object categories all provide plausible models of BOLD responses in scene-selective visual areas |
title_full_unstemmed | Fourier power, subjective distance, and object categories all provide plausible models of BOLD responses in scene-selective visual areas |
title_short | Fourier power, subjective distance, and object categories all provide plausible models of BOLD responses in scene-selective visual areas |
title_sort | fourier power, subjective distance, and object categories all provide plausible models of bold responses in scene-selective visual areas |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26594164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2015.00135 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lescroartmarkd fourierpowersubjectivedistanceandobjectcategoriesallprovideplausiblemodelsofboldresponsesinsceneselectivevisualareas AT stansburydustine fourierpowersubjectivedistanceandobjectcategoriesallprovideplausiblemodelsofboldresponsesinsceneselectivevisualareas AT gallantjackl fourierpowersubjectivedistanceandobjectcategoriesallprovideplausiblemodelsofboldresponsesinsceneselectivevisualareas |