Cargando…

Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Capsular outcomes of anterior/posterior capsulorhexis opening (ACO/PCO) are essential for performing a secondary in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation. To compare the capsular outcomes with different primary capsulorhexis sizes, Thirty-eight eligible patients (45 eyes) were randomly assigned to t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Haotian, Tan, Xuhua, Lin, Zhuoling, Chen, Jingjing, Luo, Lixia, Wu, Xiaohang, Long, Erping, Chen, Weirong, Liu, Yizhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26537991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16227
_version_ 1782399244755271680
author Lin, Haotian
Tan, Xuhua
Lin, Zhuoling
Chen, Jingjing
Luo, Lixia
Wu, Xiaohang
Long, Erping
Chen, Weirong
Liu, Yizhi
author_facet Lin, Haotian
Tan, Xuhua
Lin, Zhuoling
Chen, Jingjing
Luo, Lixia
Wu, Xiaohang
Long, Erping
Chen, Weirong
Liu, Yizhi
author_sort Lin, Haotian
collection PubMed
description Capsular outcomes of anterior/posterior capsulorhexis opening (ACO/PCO) are essential for performing a secondary in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation. To compare the capsular outcomes with different primary capsulorhexis sizes, Thirty-eight eligible patients (45 eyes) were randomly assigned to three groups by anterior capsulorhexis diameter (Group A: 3.0–3.9, Group B: 4.0–5.0, and Group C: 5.1–6.0 mm). The areas of ACO/PCO and posterior capsule opening opacity (PCOO) as primary outcomes, while, the incidence of visual axis opacity (VAO) as secondary outcome were measured at follow-up visits. Among the thirty eyes included in the final analysis, the mean area of the ACO decreased significantly, whereas the PCO enlarged with time. Group A had the highest anterior capsule constriction and percentage reduction, which increased with time. There were significant differences in the percentage reductions at 6 months and 1 year compared to 1 month in Group A and B. Group C had the highest posterior capsule enlargement. The percentage of PCOO to PCO area and the incidence of VAO was highest in Group A and lowest in Group C. Thus, Capsulorhexis diameter of 4.0–5.0 mm may yield better capsular outcomes, considering moderate contraction of ACO, moderate enlargement of PCO, and lower percentage of PCOO and VAO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4633668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46336682015-11-05 Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Lin, Haotian Tan, Xuhua Lin, Zhuoling Chen, Jingjing Luo, Lixia Wu, Xiaohang Long, Erping Chen, Weirong Liu, Yizhi Sci Rep Article Capsular outcomes of anterior/posterior capsulorhexis opening (ACO/PCO) are essential for performing a secondary in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation. To compare the capsular outcomes with different primary capsulorhexis sizes, Thirty-eight eligible patients (45 eyes) were randomly assigned to three groups by anterior capsulorhexis diameter (Group A: 3.0–3.9, Group B: 4.0–5.0, and Group C: 5.1–6.0 mm). The areas of ACO/PCO and posterior capsule opening opacity (PCOO) as primary outcomes, while, the incidence of visual axis opacity (VAO) as secondary outcome were measured at follow-up visits. Among the thirty eyes included in the final analysis, the mean area of the ACO decreased significantly, whereas the PCO enlarged with time. Group A had the highest anterior capsule constriction and percentage reduction, which increased with time. There were significant differences in the percentage reductions at 6 months and 1 year compared to 1 month in Group A and B. Group C had the highest posterior capsule enlargement. The percentage of PCOO to PCO area and the incidence of VAO was highest in Group A and lowest in Group C. Thus, Capsulorhexis diameter of 4.0–5.0 mm may yield better capsular outcomes, considering moderate contraction of ACO, moderate enlargement of PCO, and lower percentage of PCOO and VAO. Nature Publishing Group 2015-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4633668/ /pubmed/26537991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16227 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Lin, Haotian
Tan, Xuhua
Lin, Zhuoling
Chen, Jingjing
Luo, Lixia
Wu, Xiaohang
Long, Erping
Chen, Weirong
Liu, Yizhi
Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort capsular outcomes differ with capsulorhexis sizes after pediatric cataract surgery: a randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26537991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16227
work_keys_str_mv AT linhaotian capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tanxuhua capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT linzhuoling capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenjingjing capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT luolixia capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuxiaohang capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT longerping capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenweirong capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liuyizhi capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial