Cargando…
Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Capsular outcomes of anterior/posterior capsulorhexis opening (ACO/PCO) are essential for performing a secondary in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation. To compare the capsular outcomes with different primary capsulorhexis sizes, Thirty-eight eligible patients (45 eyes) were randomly assigned to t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26537991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16227 |
_version_ | 1782399244755271680 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Haotian Tan, Xuhua Lin, Zhuoling Chen, Jingjing Luo, Lixia Wu, Xiaohang Long, Erping Chen, Weirong Liu, Yizhi |
author_facet | Lin, Haotian Tan, Xuhua Lin, Zhuoling Chen, Jingjing Luo, Lixia Wu, Xiaohang Long, Erping Chen, Weirong Liu, Yizhi |
author_sort | Lin, Haotian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Capsular outcomes of anterior/posterior capsulorhexis opening (ACO/PCO) are essential for performing a secondary in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation. To compare the capsular outcomes with different primary capsulorhexis sizes, Thirty-eight eligible patients (45 eyes) were randomly assigned to three groups by anterior capsulorhexis diameter (Group A: 3.0–3.9, Group B: 4.0–5.0, and Group C: 5.1–6.0 mm). The areas of ACO/PCO and posterior capsule opening opacity (PCOO) as primary outcomes, while, the incidence of visual axis opacity (VAO) as secondary outcome were measured at follow-up visits. Among the thirty eyes included in the final analysis, the mean area of the ACO decreased significantly, whereas the PCO enlarged with time. Group A had the highest anterior capsule constriction and percentage reduction, which increased with time. There were significant differences in the percentage reductions at 6 months and 1 year compared to 1 month in Group A and B. Group C had the highest posterior capsule enlargement. The percentage of PCOO to PCO area and the incidence of VAO was highest in Group A and lowest in Group C. Thus, Capsulorhexis diameter of 4.0–5.0 mm may yield better capsular outcomes, considering moderate contraction of ACO, moderate enlargement of PCO, and lower percentage of PCOO and VAO. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4633668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46336682015-11-05 Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Lin, Haotian Tan, Xuhua Lin, Zhuoling Chen, Jingjing Luo, Lixia Wu, Xiaohang Long, Erping Chen, Weirong Liu, Yizhi Sci Rep Article Capsular outcomes of anterior/posterior capsulorhexis opening (ACO/PCO) are essential for performing a secondary in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation. To compare the capsular outcomes with different primary capsulorhexis sizes, Thirty-eight eligible patients (45 eyes) were randomly assigned to three groups by anterior capsulorhexis diameter (Group A: 3.0–3.9, Group B: 4.0–5.0, and Group C: 5.1–6.0 mm). The areas of ACO/PCO and posterior capsule opening opacity (PCOO) as primary outcomes, while, the incidence of visual axis opacity (VAO) as secondary outcome were measured at follow-up visits. Among the thirty eyes included in the final analysis, the mean area of the ACO decreased significantly, whereas the PCO enlarged with time. Group A had the highest anterior capsule constriction and percentage reduction, which increased with time. There were significant differences in the percentage reductions at 6 months and 1 year compared to 1 month in Group A and B. Group C had the highest posterior capsule enlargement. The percentage of PCOO to PCO area and the incidence of VAO was highest in Group A and lowest in Group C. Thus, Capsulorhexis diameter of 4.0–5.0 mm may yield better capsular outcomes, considering moderate contraction of ACO, moderate enlargement of PCO, and lower percentage of PCOO and VAO. Nature Publishing Group 2015-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4633668/ /pubmed/26537991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16227 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Lin, Haotian Tan, Xuhua Lin, Zhuoling Chen, Jingjing Luo, Lixia Wu, Xiaohang Long, Erping Chen, Weirong Liu, Yizhi Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Capsular Outcomes Differ with Capsulorhexis Sizes after Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | capsular outcomes differ with capsulorhexis sizes after pediatric cataract surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26537991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16227 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linhaotian capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tanxuhua capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT linzhuoling capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenjingjing capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT luolixia capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wuxiaohang capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT longerping capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenweirong capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liuyizhi capsularoutcomesdifferwithcapsulorhexissizesafterpediatriccataractsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial |